Electronic health record-based behaviour change interventions aimed at general practitioners in the UK: a mixed methods systematic review using behaviour change theory

被引:1
作者
Soames, Jamie [1 ]
Pettigrew, Luisa M. [1 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Hlth Serv Res & Policy, Fac Publ Hlth & Policy, London, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 05期
关键词
Electronic Health Records; HEALTH ECONOMICS; Primary Care; CLUSTER RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; PRIMARY-CARE; DEFAULT OPTIONS; MANAGEMENT; ASTHMA;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080546
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Electronic health record (EHR) systems are used extensively in healthcare; their design can influence clinicians' behaviour. We conducted a systematic review of EHR-based interventions aimed at changing the clinical practice of general practitioners in the UK, assessed their effectiveness and applied behaviour change theory to identify lessons for other settings.Design Mixed methods systematic review.Data sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and APA PsycINFO were searched up to March 2023.Eligibility criteria Quantitative and qualitative findings from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) controlled before-and-after studies and interrupted time series of EHR-based interventions in UK general practice were included.Data extraction and synthesis Quantitative synthesis was based on Cochrane's Synthesis without Meta-analysis. Interventions were categorised using the Behaviour Change Wheel and MINDSPACE frameworks and effectiveness determined by vote-counting using direction of effect. Inductive thematic synthesis was used for qualitative studies.Results Database searching identified 3824 unique articles; 10 were included (from 2002 to 2021), comprising eight RCTs and two associated qualitative studies. Four of seven quantitative studies showed a positive effect on clinician behaviour and three on patient-level outcomes. Behaviour change techniques that may trigger emotions and required less cognitive engagement appeared to have positive effects. Qualitative findings indicated that interventions reassured clinicians of their decisions but were sometimes ignored.Conclusion Despite widespread use, there is little high quality, up-to-date experimental evidence evaluating the effectiveness of EHR-based interventions in UK general practice. The evidence suggested EHR-based interventions may be effective at changing behaviour. Persistent, simple action-oriented prompts appeared more effective than complex interventions requiring greater cognitive engagement. However, studies lacked detail in intervention design and theory behind design choices. Future research should seek to optimise EHR-based behaviour change intervention design and delineate limitations, providing theory-based justification for interventions. This will be of increasing importance with the growing use of EHRs to influence clinicians' decisions.PROSPERO registration number CRD42022341009.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, CASP Checklists
[2]   The effect direction plot revisited: Application of the 2019 Cochrane Handbook guidance on alternative synthesis methods [J].
Boon, Michele Hilton ;
Thomson, Hilary .
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2021, 12 (01) :29-33
[3]   Factors shaping the implementation and use of Clinical Cancer Decision Tools by GPs in primary care: a qualitative framework synthesis [J].
Bradley, Paula Theresa ;
Hall, Nicola ;
Maniatopoulos, Gregory ;
Neal, Richard D. ;
Paleri, Vinidh ;
Wilkes, Scott .
BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (02)
[4]   Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline [J].
Campbell, Mhairi ;
McKenzie, Joanne E. ;
Sowden, Amanda ;
Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal ;
Brennan, Sue E. ;
Ellis, Simon ;
Hartmann-Boyce, Jamie ;
Ryan, Rebecca ;
Shepperd, Sasha ;
Thomas, James ;
Welch, Vivian ;
Thomson, Hilary .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 368
[5]   Patient views on asthma diagnosis and how a clinical decision support system could help: A qualitative study [J].
Canny, Anne ;
Donaghy, Eddie ;
Murray, Victoria ;
Campbell, Leo ;
Stonham, Carol ;
Bush, Andrew ;
McKinstry, Brian ;
Milne, Heather ;
Pinnock, Hilary ;
Daines, Luke .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2023, 26 (01) :307-317
[6]   Decision support toots to improve cancer diagnostic decision making in primary care: a systematic review [J].
Chima, Sophie ;
Reece, Jeanette C. ;
Milley, Kristi ;
Milton, Shakira ;
McIntosh, Jennifer G. ;
Emery, Jon D. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2019, 69 (689) :E809-E818
[7]   Effectiveness of educational interventions in improving detection and management of dementia in primary care: cluster randomised controlled study [J].
Downs, M ;
Turner, S ;
Bryans, M ;
Wilcock, J ;
Keady, J ;
Levin, E ;
O'Carroll, R ;
Howie, K ;
Iliffe, S .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 332 (7543) :692-695
[8]   Point-of-Care Cluster Randomized Trial in Stroke Secondary Prevention Using Electronic Health Records [J].
Dregan, Alex ;
van Staa, Tjeerd P. ;
McDermott, Lisa ;
McCann, Gerard ;
Ashworth, Mark ;
Charlton, Judith ;
Wolfe, Charles D. A. ;
Rudd, Anthony ;
Yardley, Lucy ;
Gulliford, Martin C. .
STROKE, 2014, 45 (07) :2066-2071
[9]   Effect of computerised evidence based guidelines on management of asthma and angina in adults in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial [J].
Eccles, M ;
McColl, E ;
Steen, N ;
Rousseau, N ;
Grimshaw, J ;
Parkin, D ;
Purves, I .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 325 (7370) :941-944
[10]   Heuristics and biases: Selected errors in clinical reasoning [J].
Elstein, AS .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1999, 74 (07) :791-794