How to Choose Recycling Mode between Monopoly and Competition by Considering Blockchain Technology?

被引:1
作者
Zhang, Xuemei [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Haodong [1 ]
Hang, Tao [1 ]
Meng, Qiang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fuyang Normal Univ, Business Sch, Fuyang 236037, Peoples R China
[2] Fuyang Normal Univ, Anhui Prov Key Lab Reg Logist Planning & Modern Lo, Fuyang 236037, Peoples R China
关键词
closed-loop supply chain; recycling mode; blockchain technology; competitive recycling; LOOP SUPPLY CHAIN; INFORMATION; EMISSIONS; SELECTION; PRODUCTS; STRATEGY; ROLES;
D O I
10.3390/su16156296
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Enterprises adopting a circular economy approach can effectively solve the severe situation of resources and the environment, and recycling is considered an effective means to solve environmental issues. Simultaneously, blockchain technology (BT) has been used to enhance product quality trust. However, there is limited literature on how to choose between monopolistic and competitive recycling modes by considering BT. This paper uses a game involving a manufacturer, a retailer, and a third-party recycler (TPR) in a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC). The retailer can recycle on itself and compete with the TPR for recycling used products. The results show that BT adoption could increase the recycling rate and demand for remanufactured products. BT benefits the firms in the CLSC when they control usage costs, regardless of whether competitive recycling mode is used or not. In addition, whether BT is adopted or not, CLSC firms prefer competitive recycling mode only when the competitive intensity exceeds a specific threshold. Moreover, choosing an appropriate recycling mode can alleviate the negative impact of BT on the environment, then an all-win result can be obtained for CLSC firms, consumers, and society. These results can give suggestions for managers to optimize their supply chains regarding adopting BT and implementing recycling mode. In the future, we can expand our research on the transfer price of used products, the positive and negative effects of BT, and BT cost-sharing strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Cooperative recycling strategy for electric vehicle batteries considering blockchain technology
    Xiao, Lu
    Ouyang, Yu
    Lin, Qiang
    Guo, Yujuan
    ENERGY, 2024, 313
  • [2] Blockchain technology adoption of the manufacturers with product recycling considering green consumers
    Qiao, Haike
    Zhang, Zijun
    Su, Qin
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 177
  • [3] Product pricing and recycling mode considering competition under used product error classification
    Han, Junling
    Wang, Nengmin
    He, Zhengwen
    Jiang, Bin
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 186
  • [4] Recycling supply chain mode of new energy vehicle power battery based on Blockchain technology
    Zhou X.
    Li J.
    Li F.
    Deng X.
    Jisuanji Jicheng Zhizao Xitong/Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, CIMS, 2023, 29 (04): : 1386 - 1398
  • [5] Platform's blockchain introduction strategy with considering competition between new and refurbished products
    Chen, Shuting
    Yang, Lei
    Kou, Qi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2025, 280
  • [6] Turn a blind eye? E-tailer's blockchain participation considering upstream competition between copycats and brands
    Niu, Baozhuang
    Ruan, Yiyuan
    Xu, Haotao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2023, 265