Opening decision spaces: A case study on the opportunities and constraints in the public health sector of Mpumalanga Province, South Africa

被引:1
作者
Witter, Sophie [1 ]
van der Merwe, Maria [2 ,3 ]
Twine, Rhian [3 ]
Mabetha, Denny [3 ]
Hove, Jennifer [3 ]
Tollman, Stephen M. [3 ]
D'Ambruoso, Lucia [4 ]
机构
[1] Queen Margaret Univ, Inst Global Hlth & Dev, Edinburgh, Scotland
[2] AfriDev Consultants, ZA-1240 White River, South Africa
[3] Univ Witwatersrand, Sch Publ Hlth, MRC Wits Rural Publ Hlth & Hlth Transit Res Unit A, Johannesburg, South Africa
[4] Univ Aberdeen, Inst Appl Hlth Sci, Sch Med Med Sci & Nutr, Aberdeen Ctr Hlth Data Sci, Aberdeen, Scotland
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 07期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
MORTALITY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0304775
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Decentralised and evidence-informed health systems rely on managers and practitioners at all levels having sufficient 'decision space' to make timely locally informed and relevant decisions. Our objectives were to understand decision spaces in terms of constraints and enablers and outline opportunities through which to expand them in an understudied rural context in South Africa.Methods This study examined decision spaces within Mpumalanga Province, using data and insights generated through a participatory action research process with local communities and health system stakeholders since 2015, which was combined with published documents and research team participant observation to produce findings on three core domains at three levels of the health system.Results Although capacity for decision making exists in the system, accessing it is frequently made difficult due to a number of intervening factors. While lines of authority are generally well-defined, personal networks take on an important dimension in how stakeholders can act. This is expressed through a range of informal coping strategies built on local relationships. There are constraints in terms of limited formal external accountability to communities, and internal accountability which is weak in places for individuals and focused more on meeting performance targets set at higher levels and less on enabling effective local leadership. More generally, political and personal factors are clearly identified at higher levels of the system, whereas at sub-district and facility levels, the dominant theme was constrained capacity.Conclusions By examining the balance of authority, accountability and capacity across multiple levels of the provincial health system, we are able to identify emergent decision space and areas for enlargement. Creating spaces to support more constructive relationships and dialogue across system levels emerges as important, as well as reinforcing horizontal networks to problem solve, and developing the capacity of link-agents such as community health workers to increase community accountability.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [41] Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability
    Hupe, Peter
    Hill, Michael
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2007, 85 (02) : 279 - 299
  • [42] Profile: Agincourt Health and Socio-demographic Surveillance System
    Kahn, Kathleen
    Collinson, Mark A.
    Gomez-Olive, F. Xavier
    Mokoena, Obed
    Twine, Rhian
    Mee, Paul
    Afolabi, Sulaimon A.
    Clark, Benjamin D.
    Kabudula, Chodziwadziwa W.
    Khosa, Audrey
    Khoza, Simon
    Shabangu, Mildred G.
    Silaule, Bernard
    Tibane, Jeffrey B.
    Wagner, Ryan G.
    Garenne, Michel L.
    Clark, Samuel J.
    Tollman, Stephen M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 41 (04) : 988 - 1001
  • [43] High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution
    Kruk, Margaret E.
    Gage, Anna D.
    Arsenault, Catherine
    Jordan, Keely
    Leslie, Hannah H.
    Roder-DeWan, Sanam
    Adeyi, Olusoji
    Barker, Pierre
    Daelmans, Bernadette
    Doubova, Svetlana V.
    English, Mike
    Garcia Elorrio, Ezequiel
    Guanais, Frederico
    Gureje, Oye
    Hirschhorn, Lisa R.
    Jiang, Lixin
    Kelley, Edward
    Lemango, Ephrem Tekle
    Liljestrand, Jerker
    Malata, Address
    Marchant, Tanya
    Matsoso, Malebona Precious
    Meara, John G.
    Mohanan, Manoj
    Ndiaye, Youssoupha
    Norheim, Ole F.
    Reddy, K. Srinath
    Rowe, Alexander K.
    Salomon, Joshua A.
    Thapa, Gagan
    Twum-Danso, Nana A. Y.
    Pate, Muhammad
    [J]. LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2018, 6 (11): : E1196 - E1252
  • [44] Kutzin J., 2017, Developing a national health financing strategy: a reference guide
  • [45] The path dependence of district manager decision-space in Ghana
    Kwamie, Aku
    van Dijk, Han
    Ansah, Evelyn K.
    Agyepong, Irene Akua
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2016, 31 (03) : 356 - 366
  • [46] Lehmann U., 2002, Investigating the roles and functions of clinic supervisors in the Eastern Cape Province. HST Technical Report. Durban
  • [47] Lipsky M, 2010, STREET-LEVEL BUREAUCRACY: DILEMMAS OF THE INDIVIDUAL IN PUBLIC SERVICES, 30TH EDITION, P1
  • [48] Massyn N., 2018, Health Systems Trust
  • [49] Matebese-Notshulwana K., 2019, A Critical Analysis of the Oversight Role and Function of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts (SCOPA) in Promoting Accountability in South Africas Public Sector Internet Doctor of Philosophy
  • [50] Decentralisation, Governance and Health-System Performance: 'Where You Stand Depends on Where You Sit'
    Mitchell, Andrew
    Bossert, Thomas J.
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT POLICY REVIEW, 2010, 28 (06) : 669 - 691