Driving across Markets: An Analysis of a Human-Machine Interface in Different International Contexts

被引:0
作者
Sogemeier, Denise [1 ,2 ]
Forster, Yannick [1 ]
Naujoks, Frederik [1 ]
Krems, Josef F. [2 ]
Keinath, Andreas [1 ]
机构
[1] BMW Grp, D-80937 Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Chemnitz, Dept Psychol, D-09111 Chemnitz, Germany
关键词
benchmarking; human-machine interaction; human-machine interface; usability; user experience; VEHICLE INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; AUTOMOTIVE HMI DESIGN; CULTURAL-DIFFERENCES; USABILITY; PERFORMANCE; EXPERIENCE; CHINESE; BENCHMARKING; QUALITY; USERS;
D O I
10.3390/info15060349
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The design of automotive human-machine interfaces (HMIs) for global consumers' needs to cater to a broad spectrum of drivers. This paper comprises benchmark studies and explores how users from international markets-Germany, China, and the United States-engage with the same automotive HMI. In real driving scenarios, N = 301 participants (premium vehicle owners) completed several tasks using different interaction modalities. The multi-method approach included both self-report measures to assess preference and satisfaction through well-established questionnaires and observational measures, namely experimenter ratings, to capture interaction performance. We observed a trend towards lower preference ratings in the Chinese sample. Further, interaction performance differed across the user groups, with self-reported preference not consistently aligning with observed performance. This dissociation accentuates the importance of integrating both measures in user studies. By employing benchmark data, we provide insights into varied market-based perspectives on automotive HMIs. The findings highlight the necessity for a nuanced approach to HMI design that considers diverse user preferences and interaction patterns.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Benchmarking the benchmarking models [J].
Anand, G. ;
Kodali, Rambabu .
BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2008, 15 (03) :257-291
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Design, User Experience, and Usability. Theories, Methods, and Tools for Designing the User Experience, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-07668-337, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-07668-3_37]
[3]   When to use the Bonferroni correction [J].
Armstrong, Richard A. .
OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2014, 34 (05) :502-508
[4]   Cultural Differences in Allocation of Attention in Visual Information Processing [J].
Boduroglu, Aysecan ;
Shah, Priti ;
Nisbett, Richard E. .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 40 (03) :349-360
[5]  
Bortz J., 2006, FORSCHUNGSMETHODEN E, V4th
[6]  
Braun M., 2020, P MOBILEHCI20 22 INT
[7]  
Brooke J., 1996, USABILITY EVALUATION, V189, P4
[8]   Sequential effects in preference decision: Prior preference assimilates current preference [J].
Chang, Seah ;
Kim, Chai-Youn ;
Cho, Yang Seok .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (08)
[9]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587
[10]  
Costa Borges Souza Tales Rebequi, 2016, Cross-Cultural Design. 8th International Conference, CCD 2016, held as part of HCI International 2016. Proceedings: LNCS 9741, P43, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-40093-8_5