Examining the Sustainability of Core Capacity and Evidence-Based Interventions for FIT-Based CRC Screening: California Colorectal Cancer Control Program

被引:0
作者
Omelu, Ndukaku [1 ]
Kempster, Marilyn [1 ]
Velasquez, Leeann [1 ]
de Ybarra, Jessica Nunez [1 ]
Littaua, Renato [1 ]
Davis-Patterson, Shauntay [1 ]
Coelho, Marco [1 ]
Darsie, Brendan [1 ]
Hunter, June [2 ]
Donahue, Celena [2 ]
Carrillo, Socorro [2 ]
Arias, Raquel [2 ]
Pinal, Sonia [2 ]
机构
[1] Calif Dept Publ Hlth, Sacramento, CA USA
[2] Amer Canc Soc, Sacramento, CA USA
关键词
sustaianability; colorectal cancer; California; cancer screening; federally qualified health centers; capacity evaluation; core capacity; evidence-based interventions; supporting activities; fecal immunochemical test; SOCIETY TASK-FORCE; RECOMMENDATIONS; COLONOSCOPY; STATEMENT; BREAST;
D O I
10.1177/10732748241255218
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
ObjectivesWe examined the extent to which funded satellite clinics could sustain the California Colon Cancer Control Program (C4P) strategies implemented in health systems to increase uptake of the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) or immunochemical fecal occult blood test (iFOBT) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the absence of future C4P funds.IntroductionSeven health systems consisting of 38 satellite clinics participated in C4P to examine the sustainability of the program in the absence future Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funding.MethodsQuantitative and qualitative methods with a close and open-ended survey approach, and a prospective cohort design were used to examine the sustainability of the C4P in health systems.ResultsA total of 61% of satellite clinics could not sustain funding stability. Only 26% could sustain funding stability. About, 71%, 26%, and 21% of the satellite clinics could sustain the small media platform, patient navigation services, and community health workers (CHWs), respectively. All the satellite clinics sustained the provider reminder system and professional development. Roughly, 71% and 42% of funded satellite clinics could not sustain the patient navigators and CHWs, respectively. The satellite clinics that could sustain funding stability, sustained patient navigation services and CHWs. Health systems that could not sustain funding stability, could not sustain patient navigation services and CHWs. Qualitatively, the need to support uninsured priority populations, health educators, patient navigators, care coordination activities, outreach services, and provision of enhanced services emerged. The need to support enhanced quality measures, expansion of funding, Medi-Cal Public Hospital Redesign and Incentive coverage, health plan, community linkages, resource sharing, and best practices specifically on CRC screening emerged. Themes such as automated reminder, limited personalized care delivery and capacity, transportation barriers, staff salary, expansion of care through patient navigation, and culturally appropriate media campaign also emerged.ConclusionOverall, to address sustainability barriers, funding stability should be maintained in the health systems.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2021, United States cancer statistics: Data visualizations
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2021, Colorectal Cancer: Screening
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, NHIS Data, Questionnaires and Related Documentation
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2009, Colorectal cancer: Early detection
  • [5] [Anonymous], COLORECTAL CANC FACT
  • [6] Examining the Effectiveness of Provider Incentives to Increase CRC Screening Uptake in Neighborhood Healthcare: A California Federally Qualified Health Center
    Barajas, Melissa
    Tangka, Florence K. L.
    Schultz, James
    Tantod, Kulin
    Kempster, Ying Marilyn
    Omelu, Ndukaku
    Hoover, Sonja
    Thomas, Melonie
    Richmond-Reese, Valerie
    Subramanian, Sujha
    [J]. HEALTH PROMOTION PRACTICE, 2020, 21 (06) : 898 - 904
  • [7] Intervention to Increase Recommendation and Delivery of Screening for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancers by Healthcare Providers A Systematic Review of Provider Reminders
    Baron, Roy C.
    Melillo, Stephanie
    Rimer, Barbara K.
    Coates, Ralph J.
    Kerner, Jon
    Habarta, Nancy
    Chattopadhyay, Sajal
    Sabatino, Susan A.
    Elder, Randy
    Leeks, Kimberly Jackson
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (01) : 110 - 117
  • [8] Screening for Colorectal Cancer US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
    Bibbins-Domingo, Kirsten
    Grossman, David C.
    Curry, Susan J.
    Davidson, Karina W.
    Epling, John W., Jr.
    Garcia, Francisco A. R.
    Gillman, Matthew W.
    Harper, Diane M.
    Kemper, Alex R.
    Krist, Alex H.
    Kurth, Ann E.
    Landefeld, C. Seth
    Mangione, Carol M.
    Owens, Douglas K.
    Phillips, William R.
    Phipps, Maureen G.
    Pignone, Michael P.
    Siu, Albert L.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 315 (23): : 2564 - 2575
  • [9] Diagnosis and Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Review
    Biller, Leah H.
    Schrag, Deborah
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 325 (07): : 669 - 685
  • [10] ClinicalTrials.gov, 2021, Colonoscopy and FIT as colorectal cancer screening test in the average risk population NCT02078804