Exergetic life cycle assessment for green hydrogen production

被引:13
作者
Gerhardt-Moersdorf, Janis [1 ]
Incer-Valverde, Jimena [2 ]
Morosuk, Tatiana [2 ]
Minke, Christine [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Clausthal, Chair Circular Econ Syst, Clausthal Zellerfeld, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Energy Engn, Berlin, Germany
关键词
Hydrogen; Water electrolysis; Exergy; Life cycle assessment; Exergetic life cycle assessment; ELECTROLYSIS; SUSTAINABILITY; DEMAND; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2024.131553
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a method for assessing the environmental impacts of products and processes. The life cycle inventory provides a measure of the quantitative throughput of a process, but it cannot measure the intrinsic quality of that throughput. Exergy is a measure of the quantity and quality of energy. When combining LCA and exergy analysis in an exergy-based life cycle assessment (ExLCA) a powerful tool for the quantification of resource efficiency can be established. This study performs a detailed bottom -up cradle-to-grave ExLCA based on cumulative exergy consumption and exergy analysis of the use phase for a state -of -the -art (SoA) and a future plant 5 MW proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzer plant. Three scenarios are implemented, i.e. SoA plant operated in the German grid mix of 2018, SoA plant operated in a defossilized grid, and a future plant operated in a defossilized grid. In every scenario, more than 98 % of the resource demand originates from electricity generation alone and decreases significantly with renewable electricity operation. In plant construction, the anode catalyst material iridium causes approximately half of the resource demand and bears the largest lever for the resource reduction potential of the plant construction of 65 %.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Alvarez I., 2013, EnviroInfo 2013 - EnviroInfo
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Nist-janaf thermochemical tables
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Exergy-based ecological indicators: a necessary tool for resource use assessment studies
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Global Hydrogen Review 2022, DOI DOI 10.1787/A15B8442-EN
[5]  
[Anonymous], ECOINVENT ECOINVENT
[6]  
Babic U, 2017, Review-identifying critical gaps for polymer electrolyte water electrolysis development, DOI [10.3929/ETHZ-B-000190719, DOI 10.3929/ETHZ-B-000190719]
[7]   Life cycle assessment of hydrogen from proton exchange membrane water electrolysis in future energy systems [J].
Bareiss, Kay ;
de la Rua, Cristina ;
Moeckl, Maximilian ;
Hamacher, Thomas .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 237 :862-872
[8]  
Bejan A., 1996, Thermal Design and Optimization, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0140-7007(97)87632-3
[9]   Analysis of Voltage Losses in PEM Water Electrolyzers with Low Platinum Group Metal Loadings [J].
Bernt, Maximilian ;
Siebel, Armin ;
Gasteiger, Hubert A. .
JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 165 (05) :F305-F314
[10]   Influence of Ionomer Content in IrO2/TiO2 Electrodes on PEM Water Electrolyzer Performance [J].
Bernt, Maximilian ;
Gasteiger, Hubert A. .
JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 163 (11) :F3179-F3189