Community pharmacists' attitudes towards checking prescriptions: a cross-sectional survey

被引:0
作者
van Loon, W. Ellen [1 ,2 ]
Lambert, Maarten [1 ]
Heringa, Mette [3 ]
Bouvy, Marcel L. [4 ]
Taxis, Katja [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Groningen Res Inst Pharm, Fac Sci & Engn, Unit Pharmacotherapy Epidemiol & Econ, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, NL-9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Pharm De Drie Stellingen, Brink 1-101, NL-8431 LD Oosterwolde, Netherlands
[3] SIR Inst Pharm Practice & Policy, Theda Mansholtstr 5-B, NL-2331 JE Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Univ Utrecht, Utrecht Inst Pharmaceut Sci, Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Clin Pharmacol, Univ Weg 99, NL-3584 CG Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
community pharmacy services; pharmaceutical services; drug prescriptions; dispensing; clinical assessment; final prescription check;
D O I
10.1093/ijpp/riae030
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background The final prescription check is a mandatory but time-consuming process in Dutch community pharmacies. A safer dispensing process may have made the final prescription check obsolete.Objective To describe the final prescription check in Dutch community pharmacies and explore pharmacists' attitudes towards changing this.Methods A cross-sectional survey among Dutch community pharmacists. The online questionnaire was based on literature and previous qualitative research, piloted in three pharmacies, and took 10 min to complete. Results were analysed descriptively.Results A total of 409 pharmacists participated. They saw the final prescription check as an important quality assurance of the dispensing process. Nevertheless, most pharmacists agreed that the final prescription check could be optimized as they thought that the time invested outweighed the benefits. Automation of the dispensing process, only checking selected high-risk prescriptions, and more in-process checks could reduce the need for an extensive final prescription check, rather than delegating the task to assistants. To implement changes, most pharmacists felt current dispensing guidelines needed to be adapted.Conclusion There was a widespread consensus that optimizing the final prescription check could enhance efficiency and allow more time for person-centred care. Most pharmacists expressed a preference for updated guidelines before implementing such changes.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 368
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Advancing technician practice: Deliberations of a regulatory board [J].
Adams, Alex J. .
RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2018, 14 (01) :1-5
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2024, DUTCH REGISTER HEALT
[3]  
Claes I., 2024, VERSCHILLEN PROCESSE
[4]   A machine learning-based clinical decision support system to identify prescriptions with a high risk of medication error [J].
Corny, Jennifer ;
Rajkumar, Asok ;
Martin, Olivier ;
Dode, Xavier ;
Lajonchere, Jean-Patrick ;
Billuart, Olivier ;
Bezie, Yvonnick ;
Buronfosse, Anne .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 27 (11) :1688-1694
[5]  
Davies James E, 2014, Int J Pharm Pract, V22, P309, DOI 10.1111/ijpp.12083
[6]   Pharmacist and Technician Perceptions of Tech-Check-Tech in Community Pharmacy Practice Settings [J].
Frost, Timothy P. ;
Adams, Alex J. .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2018, 31 (02) :190-194
[7]   Testing evidence routine practice: Using an implementation framework to embed a clinically proven asthma service in Australian community pharmacy [J].
Fuller, Joanne M. ;
Saini, Bandana ;
Bosnic-Anticevich, Sinthia ;
Cardenas, Victoria Garcia ;
Benrimoj, Shalom I. ;
Armour, Carol .
RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2017, 13 (05) :989-996
[8]   The Community Pharmacist: Perceived Barriers and Patient-Centered Care Communication [J].
Ilardo, Maria Laura ;
Speciale, Antonio .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (02)
[9]   Pharmacist's time spent: Space for Pharmacy-based Interventions and Consultation TimE (SPICE)-an observational time and motion study [J].
Karia, Ajay ;
Norman, Richard ;
Robinson, Suzanne ;
Lehnbom, Elin ;
Laba, Tracey-Lea ;
Durakovic, Iva ;
Balane, Christine ;
Joshi, Rohina ;
Webster, Ruth .
BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (03) :e055597
[10]  
Lambert M., 2021, PHARM WEEKBLAD, V25, P17