Perinatal outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer following blastocyst-stage embryo transfer compared to those of cleavage-stage embryo transfer: analysis of 9408 singleton newborns using propensity score analysis

被引:1
作者
Zhong, Hu-Cen [1 ]
Wan, Qi [2 ]
Hu, Yu-Ling [3 ]
Li, Tian [4 ]
Huang, Li-Juan [1 ]
Wang, Mao [1 ]
Hu, Xin-Yue [1 ]
Wang, Meng-Di [1 ]
Zhong, Zhao-Hui [5 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Med Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Joint Int Res Lab Reprod & Dev, Minist Educ China, Chongqing 400016, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp 2, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Jinxin Xinan Women & Childrens Hosp, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[4] Chongqing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Reprod Med, Chongqing 400016, Peoples R China
[5] Chongqing Med Univ, Res Ctr Med & Social Dev, Sch Publ Hlth, Chongqing 400016, Peoples R China
关键词
Frozen-thawed embryo transfer; Blastocyst; Cleavage stage; Perinatal outcomes; Pre-term birth; Large for gestational age; Small for gestational age; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT; PRETERM BIRTH; RISK;
D O I
10.1097/RD9.0000000000000091
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective:Regarding frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET), there is limited consensus on whether extending embryo culture from the cleavage stage to the blastocyst stage affects perinatal outcomes. This study aimed to compare perinatal outcomes of singletons between blastocyst-stage embryo transfer (BT) and cleavage-stage embryo transfer (CT) in FET. Methods:A total of 9408 FET cycles that met the inclusion criteria were included in this retrospective cohort study between 2019 and 2022. Blastocyst-stage embryo transfers were performed in the BT group, and cleavage-stage embryo transfers were performed in the CT group. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed, as well as propensity score matching (PSM) to adjust for confounders. Results:After PSM, a higher risk of pre-term birth (PTB; odds ratio [OR]: 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-1.50, P = 0.048) and being large for gestational age (LGA; OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.00-1.35, P = 0.050) was observed in the BT group compared to that in the CT group. After stratified PSM, in the subgroup under 35 years of age, only an increased risk of LGA was observed in the BT group compared to the CT group. Perinatal outcomes in the double-embryo transfer subgroup were similar to those in the unstratified group. However, in the subgroup beyond 35 years of age and the single embryo transfer subgroup, perinatal outcomes were not statistically different between the BT and CT groups (P >0.05). Conclusions:In FET, prolonged embryo culture to the blastocyst stage increased the risk of PTB and LGA in single fetuses. However, stratified analysis based on age and the number of transferred embryos yielded different results, necessitating further mechanistic studies.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 74
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Trade-off between double cleavage-stage embryos transfer and single blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in patients with few good quality embryos in antagonist cycles: a retrospective study using a propensity score matching analysis [J].
Han, Yan ;
Deng, Xing ;
Cai, Jiali ;
Peng, Wei ;
Duan, Chaoqun ;
Huang, Kezhen .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2024, 24 (01)
[42]   History of Recurrent Implantation Failure is Associated With the Incidence of Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Singleton Live Births Following Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles [J].
Li, Na ;
Guan, Yichun ;
Liu, Junjie ;
Ren, Bingnan ;
Du, Yulin ;
Wang, Kexin ;
Zhang, Yongjie ;
Lou, Hua .
FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 12
[43]   Serum Progesterone Level on the Day of Embryo Transfer Is Not a Reliable Predictor for Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Outcomes With Euploid Blastocyst Transfer: A Retrospective Cohort Study [J].
Chen, Wenjun ;
Xu, Yiyao ;
Liu, Xinyan ;
Pan, Jiafu ;
Cai, Bing ;
Zhou, Canquan ;
Xu, Yanwen ;
Gu, Fang .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2025, 132 :53-61
[44]   Obstetric and perinatal outcomes following programmed compared to natural frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Busnelli, Andrea ;
Schirripa, Irene ;
Fedele, Francesco ;
Bulfoni, Alessandro ;
Levi-Setti, Paolo Emanuele .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 37 (07) :1619-1641
[45]   The effect of endometrial scratch on pregnancy outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a propensity score-matched study [J].
Han, Xiao ;
Hu, Linli .
GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 38 (01) :39-44
[46]   The interval transfer of a frozen-thawed embryo is more successful than a fresh embryo transfer for women undergoing IVF with recurrent implantation failure after cleavage stage embryo biopsy [J].
Pontre, Jennifer C. ;
Ryan, John P. ;
Tan, Andy ;
Hart, Roger J. .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 59 (01) :134-139
[47]   Effect of sequential cleavage and blastocyst embryo transfer compared to single cleavage stage embryo transfer on assisted reproductive technology outcome: An RCT [J].
Homayoon, Nahid ;
Arabian, Sahereh ;
Mangoli, Esmat ;
Bayati, Fatemeh ;
Eftekhar, Maryam .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE, 2024, 22 (06) :433-440
[48]   Frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: clinical outcomes of single and double blastocyst transfers [J].
Berin, Inna ;
McLellan, Sarah T. ;
Macklin, Eric A. ;
Toth, Thomas L. ;
Wright, Diane L. .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2011, 28 (07) :575-581
[49]   Ongoing and cumulative pregnancy rate after cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer using vitrification for cryopreservation: Impact of age on the results [J].
S. Fernández-Shaw ;
R. Cercas ;
C. Braña ;
C. Villas ;
I. Pons .
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2015, 32 :177-184
[50]   Does Culture of Post-Thawed Cleavage-Stage Embryos to Blastocysts Improve Infertility Treatment Outcomes of Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles? A Randomised Clinical Trial [J].
Madani, Tahereh ;
Jahangiri, Nadia ;
Yahyaei, Azar ;
Vesali, Samira ;
Zarei, Maryam ;
Eftekhari-Yazdi, Poopak .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FERTILITY & STERILITY, 2024, 18 (02) :146-152