Perinatal outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer following blastocyst-stage embryo transfer compared to those of cleavage-stage embryo transfer: analysis of 9408 singleton newborns using propensity score analysis

被引:1
作者
Zhong, Hu-Cen [1 ]
Wan, Qi [2 ]
Hu, Yu-Ling [3 ]
Li, Tian [4 ]
Huang, Li-Juan [1 ]
Wang, Mao [1 ]
Hu, Xin-Yue [1 ]
Wang, Meng-Di [1 ]
Zhong, Zhao-Hui [5 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Med Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Joint Int Res Lab Reprod & Dev, Minist Educ China, Chongqing 400016, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp 2, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Jinxin Xinan Women & Childrens Hosp, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[4] Chongqing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Reprod Med, Chongqing 400016, Peoples R China
[5] Chongqing Med Univ, Res Ctr Med & Social Dev, Sch Publ Hlth, Chongqing 400016, Peoples R China
关键词
Frozen-thawed embryo transfer; Blastocyst; Cleavage stage; Perinatal outcomes; Pre-term birth; Large for gestational age; Small for gestational age; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT; PRETERM BIRTH; RISK;
D O I
10.1097/RD9.0000000000000091
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective:Regarding frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET), there is limited consensus on whether extending embryo culture from the cleavage stage to the blastocyst stage affects perinatal outcomes. This study aimed to compare perinatal outcomes of singletons between blastocyst-stage embryo transfer (BT) and cleavage-stage embryo transfer (CT) in FET. Methods:A total of 9408 FET cycles that met the inclusion criteria were included in this retrospective cohort study between 2019 and 2022. Blastocyst-stage embryo transfers were performed in the BT group, and cleavage-stage embryo transfers were performed in the CT group. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed, as well as propensity score matching (PSM) to adjust for confounders. Results:After PSM, a higher risk of pre-term birth (PTB; odds ratio [OR]: 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-1.50, P = 0.048) and being large for gestational age (LGA; OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.00-1.35, P = 0.050) was observed in the BT group compared to that in the CT group. After stratified PSM, in the subgroup under 35 years of age, only an increased risk of LGA was observed in the BT group compared to the CT group. Perinatal outcomes in the double-embryo transfer subgroup were similar to those in the unstratified group. However, in the subgroup beyond 35 years of age and the single embryo transfer subgroup, perinatal outcomes were not statistically different between the BT and CT groups (P >0.05). Conclusions:In FET, prolonged embryo culture to the blastocyst stage increased the risk of PTB and LGA in single fetuses. However, stratified analysis based on age and the number of transferred embryos yielded different results, necessitating further mechanistic studies.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 74
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   Comparison of perinatal outcomes following blastocyst and cleavage-stage embryo transfer: analysis of 10 years' data from a single centre [J].
Shi, Wenhao ;
Zhang, Wei ;
Li, Na ;
Xue, Xia ;
Liu, Chen ;
Qu, Pengfei ;
Shi, Juanzi ;
Huang, Chen .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2019, 38 (06) :967-978
[12]   Increased male live-birth rates after blastocyst-stage frozen-thawed embryo transfers compared with cleavage-stage frozen-thawed embryo transfers: a SART registry study [J].
Perlman, Barry E. ;
Minis, Evelyn ;
Greenberg, Patricia ;
Krishnamoorthy, Kavitha ;
Morelli, Sara S. ;
Jindal, Sangita K. ;
Mcgovern, Peter G. .
F&S REPORTS, 2021, 2 (02) :161-165
[13]   Blastocyst-stage versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer in the first frozen cycles of OHSS-risk patients who deferred from fresh embryo transfer [J].
Chen, Hua ;
Lv, Jie-Qiang ;
Wu, Xin-Mei ;
Xiao, Yu ;
Xi, Hai-Tao ;
Zhu, Chun-Fang ;
Huang, Jian-Ying ;
Zhang, Fan ;
Ge, Hong-Shan .
GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2015, 31 (09) :698-701
[14]   Blastocyst vs cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes [J].
Martins, W. P. ;
Nastri, C. O. ;
Rienzi, L. ;
Van der Poel, S. Z. ;
Gracia, C. ;
Racowsky, C. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 49 (05) :583-591
[15]   Perinatal outcomes in singleton live births after fresh blastocyst-stage embryo transfer: a retrospective analysis of 67 147 IVF/ICSI cycles [J].
Marconi, Nicola ;
Raja, Edwin Amalraj ;
Bhattacharya, Siladitya ;
Maheshwari, Abha .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2019, 34 (09) :1716-1725
[16]   Monozygotic twinning is not increased after single blastocyst transfer compared with single cleavage-stage embryo transfer [J].
Papanikolaou, Evangelosa G. ;
Fatemi, Human ;
Venetis, Christos ;
Donoso, Pato ;
Kolibianakis, Efstratios ;
Tournaye, Herman ;
Tarlatzis, Basil ;
Devroey, Paul .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 93 (02) :592-597
[17]   Frozen blastocyst embryo transfer vs. frozen cleavage-stage embryo transfer in couples with recurrent implantation failure: a cohort study [J].
Zhang, Xiaodong ;
Gao, Yang ;
Liu, Weiwei ;
Liu, Junxia ;
Wu, Lihong ;
Xiong, Shun ;
Zhu, Jiahong ;
Han, Wei ;
Wang, Jiang ;
Hao, Xiangwei ;
Han, Shubiao ;
Huang, Guoning .
HUMAN FERTILITY, 2021, 24 (04) :284-289
[18]   The influence of embryo stage on obstetric complications and perinatal outcomes following programmed compared to natural frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Zhao, Zhonghua ;
Chen, Yan ;
Deng, Hongxia ;
Huang, Lu ;
Lu, Danhua ;
Shen, Xiaoyang ;
Xu, Liangzhi .
FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 14
[19]   Congenital anomaly and perinatal outcome following blastocyst- vs cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and network meta-analysis [J].
Siristatidis, C. ;
Papapanou, M. ;
Karageorgiou, V. ;
Martins, W. P. ;
Bellos, I. ;
Teixeira, D. M. ;
Vlahos, N. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 61 (01) :12-25
[20]   Elective single cleavage-stage embryo transfer need not result in lower pregnancy rates compared to double cleavage-stage embryo transfer [J].
Nakagawa, Koji ;
Nishi, Yayoi ;
Sugiyama, Rie ;
Kuribayashi, Yasushi ;
Sugiyama, Rikikazu ;
Inoue, Masato .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2010, 36 (04) :777-782