Perinatal outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer following blastocyst-stage embryo transfer compared to those of cleavage-stage embryo transfer: analysis of 9408 singleton newborns using propensity score analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Zhong, Hu-Cen [1 ]
Wan, Qi [2 ]
Hu, Yu-Ling [3 ]
Li, Tian [4 ]
Huang, Li-Juan [1 ]
Wang, Mao [1 ]
Hu, Xin-Yue [1 ]
Wang, Meng-Di [1 ]
Zhong, Zhao-Hui [5 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Med Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Joint Int Res Lab Reprod & Dev, Minist Educ China, Chongqing 400016, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp 2, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Jinxin Xinan Women & Childrens Hosp, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[4] Chongqing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Reprod Med, Chongqing 400016, Peoples R China
[5] Chongqing Med Univ, Res Ctr Med & Social Dev, Sch Publ Hlth, Chongqing 400016, Peoples R China
关键词
Frozen-thawed embryo transfer; Blastocyst; Cleavage stage; Perinatal outcomes; Pre-term birth; Large for gestational age; Small for gestational age; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT; PRETERM BIRTH; RISK;
D O I
10.1097/RD9.0000000000000091
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective:Regarding frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET), there is limited consensus on whether extending embryo culture from the cleavage stage to the blastocyst stage affects perinatal outcomes. This study aimed to compare perinatal outcomes of singletons between blastocyst-stage embryo transfer (BT) and cleavage-stage embryo transfer (CT) in FET. Methods:A total of 9408 FET cycles that met the inclusion criteria were included in this retrospective cohort study between 2019 and 2022. Blastocyst-stage embryo transfers were performed in the BT group, and cleavage-stage embryo transfers were performed in the CT group. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed, as well as propensity score matching (PSM) to adjust for confounders. Results:After PSM, a higher risk of pre-term birth (PTB; odds ratio [OR]: 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-1.50, P = 0.048) and being large for gestational age (LGA; OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.00-1.35, P = 0.050) was observed in the BT group compared to that in the CT group. After stratified PSM, in the subgroup under 35 years of age, only an increased risk of LGA was observed in the BT group compared to the CT group. Perinatal outcomes in the double-embryo transfer subgroup were similar to those in the unstratified group. However, in the subgroup beyond 35 years of age and the single embryo transfer subgroup, perinatal outcomes were not statistically different between the BT and CT groups (P >0.05). Conclusions:In FET, prolonged embryo culture to the blastocyst stage increased the risk of PTB and LGA in single fetuses. However, stratified analysis based on age and the number of transferred embryos yielded different results, necessitating further mechanistic studies.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 74
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Perinatal outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer following blastocyst-stage embryo transfer compared to those of cleavage-stage embryo transfer: analysis of 9408 singleton newborns using propensity score analysis
    Zhong HuCen
    Wan Qi
    Hu YuLing
    Li Tian
    Huang LiJuan
    Wang Mao
    Hu XinYue
    Wang MengDi
    Zhong ZhaoHui
    生殖与发育医学(英文), 2024, 08 (02)
  • [2] Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies after blastocyst-stage embryo transfer compared with those after cleavage-stage embryo transfer: a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis
    Marconi, Nicola
    Allen, Christopher Patrick
    Bhattacharya, Siladitya
    Maheshwari, Abha
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2022, 28 (02) : 255 - 281
  • [3] Clinical pregnancy outcomes between cleavage stage embryo and blastocyst in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles
    Lee, H.
    Lee, S.
    Park, D.
    Kang, H.
    Lim, C.
    Yang, K.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2012, 27
  • [4] Blastocyst or cleavage-stage embryo transfer?
    Johnson, Neil
    Blake, Debbie
    Farquhar, Cindy
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 21 (01) : 21 - 40
  • [5] One fresh cleavage-stage single embryo transfer (SET) plus one frozen-thawed blastocyst-stage SET or one fresh cleavage-stage double embryo transfer? A retrospective matched cohort study
    Wang, Zheng
    Liu, Fang
    Hu, Kailun
    Tian, Tian
    Yang, Rui
    Wang, Yuanyuan
    Li, Rong
    Mol, Ben W.
    Qiao, Jie
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2024, 39 (12)
  • [6] Blastocyst-stage embryos provide better frozen-thawed embryo transfer outcomes for young patients with previous fresh embryo transfer failure
    Fang, Lanlan
    He, Jingyan
    Yan, Yang
    Jia, Qiongqiong
    Yu, Yiping
    Zhang, Ruizhe
    Cheng, Jung-Chien
    Sun, Ying-Pu
    AGING-US, 2020, 12 (08): : 6981 - 6989
  • [7] Blastocyst transfer is not associated with increased unfavorable obstetric and perinatal outcomes compared with cleavage-stage embryo transfer
    Li, Wei
    Xue, Xia
    Zhao, Wanqiu
    Ren, Anqi
    Zhuo, Weiwei
    Shi, Juanzi
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2017, 33 (11) : 857 - 860
  • [8] Sequential embryo transfer versus double cleavage-stage embryo or double blastocyst transfer in patients with recurrent implantation failure with frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a cohort study
    Gao, Jiangman
    Yuan, Yifeng
    Li, Jia
    Tian, Tian
    Lian, Ying
    Liu, Ping
    Li, Rong
    Qiao, Jie
    Long, Xiaoyu
    Wang, Haiyan
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [9] Cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology
    Glujovsky, Demian
    Quinteiro Retamar, Andrea Marta
    Alvarez Sedo, Cristian Roberto
    Ciapponi, Agustin
    Cornelisse, Simone
    Blake, Deborah
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, (05):
  • [10] Obstetric and neonatal outcomes in blastocyst-stage biopsy with frozen embryo transfer and cleavage-stage biopsy with fresh embryo transfer after preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening
    Jing, Shuang
    Luo, Keli
    He, Hui
    Lu, Changfu
    Zhang, Shuoping
    Tan, Yueqiu
    Gong, Fei
    Lu, Guangxiu
    Lin, Ge
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (01) : 105 - +