Outcomes of Neonates Born with Symptomatic Tetralogy of Fallot and Absent Ductus Arteriosus

Objective To test the hypothesis that neonates with symptomatic tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) and absent ductus arteriosus (ADA) have worse clinical outcomes compared with those with a ductus arteriosus (DA), and that this difference is driven by those born with ADA and with critically deficient pulmonary blood flow (CDPBF). Study design We performed a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of neonates who underwent intervention for symptomatic TOF comparing death and reintervention between subjects with and without a DA identified on fetal echocardiogram or on echocardiogram performed in the first postnatal day. Exclusion criteria were as follows: inability to define DA status, collaterals supplying pulmonary blood flow, atrioventricular septal defect, and absent pulmonary valve. We defined CDPBF as undergoing a procedure to augment pulmonary blood flow on the date of birth or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation prior to such a procedure. Results The study cohort included 519 patients, among whom 11% had ADA. Patients with ADA were more likely to have a genetic syndrome and had smaller branch pulmonary artery size. In analyses adjusting for center, interventional treatment strategy, genetic syndrome, and minimum branch pulmonary artery size, ADA was associated with higher mortality risk (adjusted hazard ratio of 2.37 (95% CI: 1.07,5.27; P = .034). Seven patients had CDPBF (1.3% of the entire cohort and 12% of patients with ADA). Conclusions A minority of symptomatic TOF neonates have ADA, which is associated with higher adjusted mortality risk compared with those with a DA. CDPBF appears to be a rare but important entity in this population.