Design issues concerning circular economy assessment methods at the product level: a comparative analysis through a case study of a mobile tiny house

被引:1
作者
Ruiz-Pastor, Laura [1 ,2 ]
Altavilla, Stefania
Borgianni, Yuri [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jaume 1, Dept Mech Engn & Construct, Castellon de La Plana, Spain
[2] Free Univ Bozen Bolzano, Fac Engn, Bolzano, Italy
来源
DESIGN SCIENCE | 2024年 / 10卷
关键词
Circular economy; Eco-design; Product design; Impact assessment; Indicator; Product lifetime; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS; CLASSIFICATION; FRAMEWORK; PERSPECTIVES; BUILDINGS; TAXONOMY; INDUSTRY; TOOLS;
D O I
10.1017/dsj.2024.12
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Sustainability evaluations are increasingly relevant in the design of products. Within sustainability-related frameworks, circular economy (CE) has gained attention in the last few years, and this has vastly affected design, leading, for example, to design for circularity. This article deals with the wide range of product-level CE assessment tools, out of which some are applied to a case study from the building sector, namely a tiny house made with hemp bricks. Attention was specifically paid to those methods through which a single circularity indicator could be extrapolated. Overall, the objective of this work is to study the convergence of existing CE assessment methods in providing consistent circularity performances. The results show similarities in the overall circularity scores despite differences in the variables used to achieve that final score. Thus, despite the lack of standard methods, the results suggest that many of these tools are sufficiently interchangeable, also in consideration of consistent indications to improve the circularity of the tiny house. This means that consistent inputs are provided to anyone willing to redesign the tiny house with the objective of making it more circular irrespective of the assessment tool used.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 79 条
  • [1] Ahlstedt Emma, 2023, Procedia CIRP, P582, DOI 10.1016/j.procir.2023.02.098
  • [2] A Parametric Approach to Optimizing Building Construction Systems and Carbon Footprint: A Case Study Inspired by Circularity Principles
    Al-Obaidy, Muheeb
    Courard, Luc
    Attia, Shady
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (06)
  • [3] Life cycle assessment of natural building materials: the role of carbonation, mixture components and transport in the environmental impacts of hempcrete blocks
    Arrigoni, Alessandro
    Pelosato, Renato
    Melia, Paco
    Ruggieri, Gianluca
    Sabbadini, Sergio
    Dotelli, Giovanni
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 149 : 1051 - 1061
  • [4] Indicators of sustainable development for industry: A general framework
    Azapagic, A
    Perdan, S
    [J]. PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2000, 78 (B4) : 243 - 261
  • [5] Barth M., 2015, Carbon Footprint and Sustainability of Different Natural Fibres for Biocomposites and Insulation Material
  • [6] Thirty years of design for sustainability: an evolution of research, policy and practice
    Bhamra, Tracy
    Hernandez, Ricardo J.
    [J]. DESIGN SCIENCE, 2021, 7
  • [7] Taking the Circularity to the Next Level A Special Issue on the Circular Economy
    Bocken, Nancy M. P.
    Olivetti, Elsa A.
    Cullen, Jonathan M.
    Potting, Jose
    Lifset, Reid
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2017, 21 (03) : 476 - 482
  • [8] Approach for the analysis of TES technologies aiming towards a circular economy: Case study of building-like cubicles
    Boer, Dieter
    Segarra, Merce
    Ines Fernandez, A.
    Valles, Manel
    Mateu, Carles
    Cabeza, Luisa F.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 150 (150) : 589 - 597
  • [9] Investigating the future of the fuzzy front end: towards a change of paradigm in the very early design phases?
    Borgianni, Y.
    Cascini, G.
    Rotini, F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2018, 29 (11) : 644 - 664
  • [10] A taxonomy of ecodesign tools for integrating environmental requirements into the product design process
    Bovea, M. D.
    Perez-Belis, V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2012, 20 (01) : 61 - 71