Phase II Clinical Trial of Second Course of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases

被引:1
|
作者
Ito, Kei [1 ]
Nakajima, Yujiro [1 ,2 ]
Taguchi, Kentaro [1 ]
Ogawa, Hiroaki [1 ,3 ]
Saito, Makoto [4 ]
Murofushi, Keiko Nemoto [1 ]
机构
[1] Komagome Hosp, Tokyo Metropolitan Canc & Infect Dis Ctr, Dept Radiol, Div Radiat Oncol, 3-18-22 Honkomagome,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138677, Japan
[2] Komazawa Univ, Dept Radiol Sci, 1-23-1 Komazawa,Setagaya Ku, Tokyo 1548525, Japan
[3] Tohoku Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Grad Sch Med, 1-1 Seiryo Machi,Aoba Ku, Sendai 9808574, Japan
[4] Komagome Hosp, Tokyo Metropolitan Canc & Infect Dis Ctr, Div Clin Res Support, 3-18-22 Honkomagome,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138677, Japan
关键词
adverse effect; prospective clinical trial; second course; stereotactic body radiotherapy; spinal metastases; RADIATION-THERAPY; INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS; MULTIPLE FRACTIONS; BONE METASTASES; END-POINTS; RADIOSURGERY; UPDATE; INSTITUTION; MULTICENTER; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.3390/cancers16122286
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This single-center, single-arm, phase II trial aimed to propose a safe and effective salvage spine SBRT regimen for patients with spinal metastases. The second SBRT dose consisted of 30 Gy delivered in five fractions with specific dose constraints for the spinal cord and nerve plexuses. Among the enrolled patients, 12 received the second SBRT at the same spinal level, while 8 received it at an adjacent level. No instances of radiation myelopathy or local failure were observed during the follow-up period. However, grade 3 late adverse effects (including lumbosacral plexopathy and vertebral compression fractures) were observed in 25% of patients throughout the entire follow-up period, suggesting that the second SBRT poses a risk of toxicity. Abstract Purpose: The optimal method for the second course of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases remains poorly established. This single-center, single-arm, phase II trial was conducted to propose a safe and effective salvage spine SBRT. Methods: The patients initially treated with SBRT for spine-targeted protocol treatment, or for areas adjacent to the spine, were enrolled. The second SBRT dose was 30 Gy delivered in five fractions; the spinal cord dose constraint was 15.5 Gy at the maximum point dose. The brachial or lumbosacral plexuses were dose-constrained to <30 Gy if the boundary between the nerves and tumors was detected. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (grade >= 3 severe radiation-related toxicity) within a year after the second SBRT. Results: The second SBRT was administered to the same spinal level in 12 patients and to an adjacent spinal level in 8 patients. SBRT2 was performed for 14 painful lesions, 10 MESCC, and 6 oligometastases, with some lesions having multiple indications. The median interval between SBRT sessions was 21 months (range: 6-51 months). The median follow-up duration was 14 months. No radiation myelopathy or local failure was reported during the follow-up period. DLT was confirmed in two patients (10%) within a year, both of whom developed grade 3 lumbosacral plexopathy. These two patients received SBRT twice to the S1-2 and S1-5 vertebrae, respectively, and both experienced paralysis of the tibialis anterior muscle (L5 level). Grade 3 late adverse effects (including lumbosacral plexopathy and vertebral compression fracture) were observed in 25% of the patients throughout the entire follow-up period. Conclusions: The second spine SBRT achieved good local control without causing myelopathy. However, one-quarter of the patients experienced grade 3 late adverse effects, suggesting that the treatment protocol carries a risk of toxicity.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fractionated radiosurgery for painful spinal metastases: DOSIS - a phase II trial
    Guckenberger, Matthias
    Hawkins, Maria
    Flentje, Michael
    Sweeney, Reinhart A.
    BMC CANCER, 2012, 12
  • [42] A phase III randomized-controlled, single-blind trial to improve quality of life with stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with painful bone metastases (ROBOMET)
    Mercier, Carole
    Dirix, Piet
    Ost, Piet
    Billiet, Charlotte
    Joye, Ines
    Vermeulen, Peter
    Lievens, Yolande
    Verellen, Dirk
    BMC CANCER, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [43] Vertebral compression fracture after stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases
    Sahgal, Arjun
    Whyne, Cari M.
    Ma, Lijun
    Larson, David A.
    Fehlings, Michael G.
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2013, 14 (08) : E310 - E320
  • [44] Marginal Recurrence Requiring Salvage Radiotherapy After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases
    Koyfman, Shlomo A.
    Djemil, Toufik
    Burdick, Michael J.
    Woody, Neil
    Balagamwala, Ehsan H.
    Reddy, Chandana A.
    Angelov, Lilyana
    Suh, John H.
    Chao, Samuel T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 83 (01): : 297 - 302
  • [45] Quality of Life Following Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy for Vertebral Metastases: Secondary Analysis of an Exploratory Phase II Randomized Trial
    Sprave, Tanja
    Verma, Vivek
    Foerster, Robert
    Schlampp, Ingmar
    Bruckner, Thomas
    Bostel, Tilman
    El Shafie, Rami Ateayh
    Nicolay, Nils Henrik
    Debus, Juergen
    Rief, Harald
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 38 (08) : 4961 - 4968
  • [46] Stereotactic body radiotherapy combined with sintilimab in patients with recurrent or oligometastatic hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase II clinical trial
    Chen, Yi-Xing
    Yang, Ping
    Du, Shi-Suo
    Zhuang, Yuan
    Huang, Cheng
    Hu, Yong
    Zhu, Wen-Chao
    Yu, Yi-Yi
    Liu, Tian-Shu
    Zeng, Zhao-Chong
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 29 (24) : 3871 - 3882
  • [47] Intrafractional motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy of spinal metastases utilizing cone beam computed tomography image guidance
    Svestad, Jorund Graadal
    Ramberg, Christina
    Skar, Birgitte
    Hellebust, Taran Paulsen
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 12 : 1 - 6
  • [48] Predictive model based on DCE-MRI and clinical features for the evaluation of pain response after stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with spinal metastases
    Chen, Yongye
    Wang, Qizheng
    Zhou, Guangjin
    Liu, Ke
    Qin, Siyuan
    Zhao, Weili
    Xin, Peijin
    Yuan, Huishu
    Zhuang, Hongqing
    Lang, Ning
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2023, 33 (07) : 4812 - 4821
  • [49] Comparing conVEntional RadioTherapy with stereotactIC body radiotherapy in patients with spinAL metastases: study protocol for an randomized controlled trial following the cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design
    Joanne M. van der Velden
    Helena M. Verkooijen
    Enrica Seravalli
    Jochem Hes
    A. Sophie Gerlich
    Nicolien Kasperts
    Wietse S. C. Eppinga
    Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
    Marco van Vulpen
    BMC Cancer, 16
  • [50] Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases: What are the Risks and How Do We Minimize Them?
    Chang, Joe H.
    Shin, John H.
    Yamada, Yoshiya J.
    Mesfin, Addisu
    Fehlings, Michael G.
    Rhines, Laurence D.
    Sahgal, Arjun
    SPINE, 2016, 41 (20) : S238 - S245