Phase II Clinical Trial of Second Course of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases

被引:1
|
作者
Ito, Kei [1 ]
Nakajima, Yujiro [1 ,2 ]
Taguchi, Kentaro [1 ]
Ogawa, Hiroaki [1 ,3 ]
Saito, Makoto [4 ]
Murofushi, Keiko Nemoto [1 ]
机构
[1] Komagome Hosp, Tokyo Metropolitan Canc & Infect Dis Ctr, Dept Radiol, Div Radiat Oncol, 3-18-22 Honkomagome,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138677, Japan
[2] Komazawa Univ, Dept Radiol Sci, 1-23-1 Komazawa,Setagaya Ku, Tokyo 1548525, Japan
[3] Tohoku Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Grad Sch Med, 1-1 Seiryo Machi,Aoba Ku, Sendai 9808574, Japan
[4] Komagome Hosp, Tokyo Metropolitan Canc & Infect Dis Ctr, Div Clin Res Support, 3-18-22 Honkomagome,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138677, Japan
关键词
adverse effect; prospective clinical trial; second course; stereotactic body radiotherapy; spinal metastases; RADIATION-THERAPY; INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS; MULTIPLE FRACTIONS; BONE METASTASES; END-POINTS; RADIOSURGERY; UPDATE; INSTITUTION; MULTICENTER; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.3390/cancers16122286
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This single-center, single-arm, phase II trial aimed to propose a safe and effective salvage spine SBRT regimen for patients with spinal metastases. The second SBRT dose consisted of 30 Gy delivered in five fractions with specific dose constraints for the spinal cord and nerve plexuses. Among the enrolled patients, 12 received the second SBRT at the same spinal level, while 8 received it at an adjacent level. No instances of radiation myelopathy or local failure were observed during the follow-up period. However, grade 3 late adverse effects (including lumbosacral plexopathy and vertebral compression fractures) were observed in 25% of patients throughout the entire follow-up period, suggesting that the second SBRT poses a risk of toxicity. Abstract Purpose: The optimal method for the second course of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases remains poorly established. This single-center, single-arm, phase II trial was conducted to propose a safe and effective salvage spine SBRT. Methods: The patients initially treated with SBRT for spine-targeted protocol treatment, or for areas adjacent to the spine, were enrolled. The second SBRT dose was 30 Gy delivered in five fractions; the spinal cord dose constraint was 15.5 Gy at the maximum point dose. The brachial or lumbosacral plexuses were dose-constrained to <30 Gy if the boundary between the nerves and tumors was detected. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (grade >= 3 severe radiation-related toxicity) within a year after the second SBRT. Results: The second SBRT was administered to the same spinal level in 12 patients and to an adjacent spinal level in 8 patients. SBRT2 was performed for 14 painful lesions, 10 MESCC, and 6 oligometastases, with some lesions having multiple indications. The median interval between SBRT sessions was 21 months (range: 6-51 months). The median follow-up duration was 14 months. No radiation myelopathy or local failure was reported during the follow-up period. DLT was confirmed in two patients (10%) within a year, both of whom developed grade 3 lumbosacral plexopathy. These two patients received SBRT twice to the S1-2 and S1-5 vertebrae, respectively, and both experienced paralysis of the tibialis anterior muscle (L5 level). Grade 3 late adverse effects (including lumbosacral plexopathy and vertebral compression fracture) were observed in 25% of the patients throughout the entire follow-up period. Conclusions: The second spine SBRT achieved good local control without causing myelopathy. However, one-quarter of the patients experienced grade 3 late adverse effects, suggesting that the treatment protocol carries a risk of toxicity.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Stereotactic body radiotherapy for painful spinal metastases: a decade of experience at a single institution
    Chou, Kuan-Nien
    Park, David J.
    Hori, Yusuke S.
    Persad, Amit R.
    Chuang, Cynthia F.
    Emrich, Sara C.
    Ustrzynski, Louisa
    Tayag, Armine
    Kumar, Kiran A.
    Usoz, Melissa
    Mendoza, Maria
    Rahimy, Elham
    Pollom, Erqi
    Soltys, Scott G.
    Lo, Cheng-Hsiang
    Chang, Steven D.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2024, 41 (04) : 532 - 540
  • [22] ESTRO clinical practice guideline: Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spine metastases
    Guckenberger, M.
    Andratschke, N.
    Belka, C.
    Bellut, D.
    Cuccia, F.
    Dahele, M.
    Guninski, R. S.
    Josipovic, M.
    Mancosu, P.
    Minniti, G.
    Niyazi, M.
    Ricardi, U.
    Munck, P.
    Sahgal, A.
    Tsang, Y.
    Verbakel, W. F. A. R.
    Alongi, F.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 190
  • [23] Clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma
    Lee, Eonju
    Kim, Tae Gyu
    Park, Hee Chul
    Il Yu, Jeong
    Lim, Do Hoon
    Nam, Heerim
    Lee, Hyebin
    Lee, Joon Hyeok
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 33 (03): : 217 - 225
  • [24] Re-irradiation stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: a multi-institutional outcome analysis
    Hashmi, Ahmed
    Guckenberger, Matthias
    Kersh, Ron
    Gerszten, Peter C.
    Mantel, Frederick
    Grills, Inga S.
    Flickinger, John C.
    Shin, John H.
    Fahim, Daniel K.
    Winey, Brian
    Oh, Kevin
    Cho, B. C. John
    Letourneau, Daniel
    Sheehan, Jason
    Sahgal, Arjun
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2016, 25 (05) : 646 - 653
  • [25] A prospective multicentre feasibility study of stereotactic body radiotherapy in Japanese patients with spinal metastases
    Ito, Kei
    Furuya, Tomohisa
    Shikama, Naoto
    Nihei, Keiji
    Tanaka, Hiroshi
    Kumazaki, Yu
    Nishimura, Hideki
    Karasawa, Katsuyuki
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 49 (11) : 999 - 1003
  • [26] Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for Spinal Metastases: Who Will Benefit the Most from SBRT?
    Park, Hae Jin
    Kim, Hee Jung
    Won, Jong-Ho
    Lee, Sang Chul
    Chang, Ah Ram
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2015, 14 (02) : 159 - 167
  • [27] Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases: Practice Guidelines, Outcomes, and Risks
    Jabbari, Siavash
    Gerszten, Peter C.
    Ruschin, Mark
    Larson, David A.
    Lo, Simon S.
    Sahgal, Arjun
    CANCER JOURNAL, 2016, 22 (04) : 280 - 289
  • [28] Pain REduction with bone metastases STereotactic radiotherapy (PREST): A phase III randomized multicentric trial
    Cellini, Francesco
    Manfrida, Stefania
    Deodato, Francesco
    Cilla, Savino
    Maranzano, Ernesto
    Pergolizzi, Stefano
    Arcidiacono, Fabio
    Di Franco, Rossella
    Pastore, Francesco
    Muto, Matteo
    Borzillo, Valentina
    Donati, Costanza Maria
    Siepe, Giambattista
    Parisi, Salvatore
    Salatino, Antonia
    D'Agostino, Antonino
    Montesi, Giampaolo
    Santacaterina, Anna
    Fusco, Vincenzo
    Santarelli, Mario
    Gambacorta, Maria Antonietta
    Corvo, Renzo
    Morganti, Alessio Giuseppe
    Masiello, Valeria
    Muto, Paolo
    Valentini, Vincenzo
    TRIALS, 2019, 20 (01)
  • [29] Efficacy and safety of different fractions in stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: A systematic review
    Gong, Yining
    Xu, Lingyi
    Zhuang, Hongqing
    Jiang, Liang
    Wei, Feng
    Liu, Zhongjun
    Li, Yan
    Yu, Miao
    Ni, Kaiwen
    Liu, Xiaoguang
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (14): : 6176 - 6184
  • [30] Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal oligometastases: a review on patient selection and the optimal methodology
    Ito, Kei
    Nakajima, Yujiro
    Ikuta, Syuzo
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 40 (10) : 1017 - 1023