Phase II Clinical Trial of Second Course of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases

被引:1
|
作者
Ito, Kei [1 ]
Nakajima, Yujiro [1 ,2 ]
Taguchi, Kentaro [1 ]
Ogawa, Hiroaki [1 ,3 ]
Saito, Makoto [4 ]
Murofushi, Keiko Nemoto [1 ]
机构
[1] Komagome Hosp, Tokyo Metropolitan Canc & Infect Dis Ctr, Dept Radiol, Div Radiat Oncol, 3-18-22 Honkomagome,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138677, Japan
[2] Komazawa Univ, Dept Radiol Sci, 1-23-1 Komazawa,Setagaya Ku, Tokyo 1548525, Japan
[3] Tohoku Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Grad Sch Med, 1-1 Seiryo Machi,Aoba Ku, Sendai 9808574, Japan
[4] Komagome Hosp, Tokyo Metropolitan Canc & Infect Dis Ctr, Div Clin Res Support, 3-18-22 Honkomagome,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138677, Japan
关键词
adverse effect; prospective clinical trial; second course; stereotactic body radiotherapy; spinal metastases; RADIATION-THERAPY; INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS; MULTIPLE FRACTIONS; BONE METASTASES; END-POINTS; RADIOSURGERY; UPDATE; INSTITUTION; MULTICENTER; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.3390/cancers16122286
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This single-center, single-arm, phase II trial aimed to propose a safe and effective salvage spine SBRT regimen for patients with spinal metastases. The second SBRT dose consisted of 30 Gy delivered in five fractions with specific dose constraints for the spinal cord and nerve plexuses. Among the enrolled patients, 12 received the second SBRT at the same spinal level, while 8 received it at an adjacent level. No instances of radiation myelopathy or local failure were observed during the follow-up period. However, grade 3 late adverse effects (including lumbosacral plexopathy and vertebral compression fractures) were observed in 25% of patients throughout the entire follow-up period, suggesting that the second SBRT poses a risk of toxicity. Abstract Purpose: The optimal method for the second course of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases remains poorly established. This single-center, single-arm, phase II trial was conducted to propose a safe and effective salvage spine SBRT. Methods: The patients initially treated with SBRT for spine-targeted protocol treatment, or for areas adjacent to the spine, were enrolled. The second SBRT dose was 30 Gy delivered in five fractions; the spinal cord dose constraint was 15.5 Gy at the maximum point dose. The brachial or lumbosacral plexuses were dose-constrained to <30 Gy if the boundary between the nerves and tumors was detected. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (grade >= 3 severe radiation-related toxicity) within a year after the second SBRT. Results: The second SBRT was administered to the same spinal level in 12 patients and to an adjacent spinal level in 8 patients. SBRT2 was performed for 14 painful lesions, 10 MESCC, and 6 oligometastases, with some lesions having multiple indications. The median interval between SBRT sessions was 21 months (range: 6-51 months). The median follow-up duration was 14 months. No radiation myelopathy or local failure was reported during the follow-up period. DLT was confirmed in two patients (10%) within a year, both of whom developed grade 3 lumbosacral plexopathy. These two patients received SBRT twice to the S1-2 and S1-5 vertebrae, respectively, and both experienced paralysis of the tibialis anterior muscle (L5 level). Grade 3 late adverse effects (including lumbosacral plexopathy and vertebral compression fracture) were observed in 25% of the patients throughout the entire follow-up period. Conclusions: The second spine SBRT achieved good local control without causing myelopathy. However, one-quarter of the patients experienced grade 3 late adverse effects, suggesting that the treatment protocol carries a risk of toxicity.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal and Bone Metastases
    Bhattacharya, I. S.
    Hoskin, P. J.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 27 (05) : 298 - 306
  • [2] The evolution and rise of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases
    Vellayappan, Balamurugan A.
    Chao, Samuel T.
    Foote, Matthew
    Guckenberger, Matthias
    Redmond, Kristin J.
    Chang, Eric L.
    Mayr, Nina A.
    Sahgal, Arjun
    Lo, Simon S.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2018, 18 (09) : 887 - 900
  • [3] The impact of radiosensitivity on clinical outcomes of spinal metastases treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy
    Guo, Lanlan
    Xu, Qingqing
    Ke, Lixin
    Wu, Ziwei
    Zeng, Ziyi
    Chen, Lei
    Chen, Yuanyuan
    Lu, Lixia
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (12): : 13279 - 13289
  • [4] Palliative stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal and non-spinal bone metastases: combining tradition and innovation
    Ito, Kei
    Nakamura, Naoki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025,
  • [5] Phase 1/2 Trial of Single-Session Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Previously Unirradiated Spinal Metastases
    Garg, Amit K.
    Shiu, Almon S.
    Yang, James
    Wang, Xin-Shelley
    Allen, Pamela
    Brown, Barry W.
    Grossman, Patricia
    Frija, Erik K.
    McAleer, Mary Frances
    Azeem, Syed
    Brown, Paul D.
    Rhines, Laurence D.
    Chang, Eric L.
    CANCER, 2012, 118 (20) : 5069 - 5077
  • [6] Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional external beam radiotherapy in patients with painful spinal metastases: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial
    Sahgal, Arjun
    Myrehaug, Sten D.
    Siva, Shankar
    Masucci, Giuseppina L.
    Maralani, Pejman J.
    Brundage, Michael
    Butler, James
    Chow, Edward
    Fehlings, Michael G.
    Foote, Mathew
    Gabos, Zsolt
    Greenspoon, Jeffrey
    Kerba, Marc
    Lee, Young
    Liu, Mitchell
    Liu, Stanley K.
    Thibault, Isabelle
    Wong, Rebecca K.
    Hum, Maaike
    Ding, Keyue
    Parulekar, Wendy R.
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2021, 22 (07) : 1023 - 1033
  • [7] Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: a review
    Guo, Lanlan
    Ke, Lixin
    Zeng, Ziyi
    Yuan, Chuanping
    Wu, Ziwei
    Chen, Lei
    Lu, Lixia
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 39 (05)
  • [8] Comparing conVEntional RadioTherapy with stereotactIC body radiotherapy in patients with spinAL metastases: study protocol for an randomized controlled trial following the cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design
    van der Velden, Joanne M.
    Verkooijen, Helena M.
    Seravalli, Enrica
    Hes, Jochem
    Gerlich, A. Sophie
    Kasperts, Nicolien
    Eppinga, Wietse S. C.
    Verlaan, Jorrit-Jan
    van Vulpen, Marco
    BMC CANCER, 2016, 16
  • [9] Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases: Clinical Experience in 134 Cases From a Single Japanese Institution
    Ito, Kei
    Ogawa, Hiroaki
    Shimizuguchi, Takuya
    Nihei, Keiji
    Furuya, Tomohisa
    Tanaka, Hiroshi
    Karasawa, Katsuyuki
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2018, 17
  • [10] Risk of radiculopathy caused by second course of spine stereotactic body radiotherapy
    Ito, Kei
    Nakajima, Yujiro
    Ogawa, Hiroaki
    Taguchi, Kentaro
    Sugita, Shurei
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 52 (08) : 903 - 908