The Integration of Dual Evaluation and Minimum Spanning Tree Clustering to Support Decision-Making in Territorial Spatial Planning

被引:5
作者
Jia, Muxin [1 ]
Liu, Ang [2 ]
Narahara, Taro [1 ]
机构
[1] New Jersey Inst Technol, Hillier Coll Architecture & Design, Newark, NJ 07102 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Global Urban Studies Program, Newark, NJ 07102 USA
关键词
territorial spatial planning; dual evaluation; minimum spanning tree clustering; decision-making; land-use layout; LAND-USE; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; URBAN; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEM; CHINA; GRAPH;
D O I
10.3390/su16103928
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Spatial planning, a policy instrument for creating sustainable environments that meet the needs of the current and future generations, has been implemented extensively worldwide. However, it is difficult for urban planners to thoroughly determine the spatial value of a territory and make informed decisions regarding the efficient utilization of regional resources in the real world. This study proposes a novel methodological framework for spatial pattern optimization that can guide future land use by integrating Minimum Spanning Tree (MST) clustering with a comprehensive evaluation system (dual evaluation). Furthermore, the validity of this framework is demonstrated through a case study of territorial spatial planning in Deyang, China. The findings indicate that (1) the methodological framework presented in this study offers valuable guidance for the spatial arrangement of territorial resources, especially in practical projects; and (2) the combination of dual evaluation and MST clustering can facilitate automatic regionalization to identify spatial clusters exhibiting functional similarity in terms of land use. By focusing on methodological advancements, this study concludes that the integration of dual evaluation (DE) and MST clustering not only simplifies the identification of optimal land-use patterns but also promotes a more systematic and efficient approach to support spatial planning.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Research note: Spatial planning in Europe and Central Asia - Enhancing the consideration of biodiversity and ecosystem services
    Albert, Christian
    Fuerst, Christine
    Ring, Irene
    Sandstrom, Camilla
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2020, 196
  • [2] Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined
    Albrechts, L
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 2004, 31 (05) : 743 - 758
  • [3] Using public participatory mapping to inform general land use planning and zoning
    Brown, Greg
    Sanders, Sara
    Reed, Pat
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2018, 177 : 64 - 74
  • [4] Machine Learning Algorithms for Urban Land Use Planning: A Review
    Chaturvedi, Vineet
    de Vries, Walter T.
    [J]. URBAN SCIENCE, 2021, 5 (03)
  • [5] Geographical thoughts on the relationship between 'Beautiful China' and land spatial planning
    Chen Mingxing
    Liang Longwu
    Wang Zhenbo
    Zhang Wenzhong
    Yu Jianhui
    Liang Yi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 30 (05) : 705 - 723
  • [6] Innovations in spatial planning as a social process - phases, actors, conflicts
    Christmann, Gabriela B.
    Ibert, Oliver
    Jessen, Johann
    Walther, Uwe-Jens
    [J]. EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2020, 28 (03) : 496 - 520
  • [7] GIS-based geo-environmental evaluation for urban land-use planning: a case study
    Dai, FC
    Lee, CF
    Zhang, XH
    [J]. ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2001, 61 (04) : 257 - 271
  • [8] Dejeant-Pons M., 2010, Basic Texts, V3
  • [9] Dey A., 2016, Ann. Fuzzy Math. Inform, V12, P419
  • [10] Relationship between the dynamics of social capital and the dynamics of residential satisfaction under the impact of urban renewal
    Du, Tongyun
    Zeng, Ningshuang
    Huang, Yinxuan
    Vejre, Henrik
    [J]. CITIES, 2020, 107