The 2023 US National Seismic Hazard Model: Ground-motion characterization for the conterminous United States

被引:7
|
作者
Moschetti, Morgan P. [1 ,4 ]
Aagaard, Brad T. [1 ]
Ahdi, Sean K. [1 ,2 ]
Altekruse, Jason [1 ]
Boyd, Oliver S. [1 ]
Frankel, Arthur D. [3 ]
Herrick, Julie [1 ]
Petersen, Mark D. [1 ]
Powers, Peter M. [1 ]
Rezaeian, Sanaz [1 ]
Shumway, Allison M. [1 ]
Smith, James A. [1 ]
Stephenson, William J. [1 ]
Thompson, Eric M. [1 ]
Withers, Kyle B. [1 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Geol Hazards Sci Ctr, Golden, CO USA
[2] AECOM, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] US Geol Survey, Earthquake Sci Ctr, Seattle, WA USA
[4] US Geol Survey, POB 25046,MS 966, Denver, CO 80225 USA
关键词
Conterminous United States; earthquake ground motion; PSHA; seismic hazard; BAND SYNTHETIC SEISMOGRAMS; MAGNITUDE; 9; EARTHQUAKES; 5-PERCENT DAMPED PSA; 2018; UPDATE; STOCHASTIC SYNTHETICS; 3D SIMULATIONS; AMPLIFICATION; PGA; METHODOLOGY; COMPONENTS;
D O I
10.1177/87552930231223995
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
We update the ground-motion characterization for the 2023 National Seismic Hazard Model (NSHM) for the conterminous United States. The update includes the use of new ground-motion models (GMMs) in the Cascadia subduction zone; an adjustment to the central and eastern United States (CEUS) GMMs to reduce misfits with observed data; an updated boundary for the application of GMMs for shallow, crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regions (i.e. western United States (WUS)) and stable continental regions (i.e. CEUS); and the use of improved models for the site response of deep sedimentary basins in the WUS and CEUS. Site response updates include basin models for the California Great Valley and for the Portland and Tualatin basins, Oregon, as well as long-period basin effects from three-dimensional simulations in the Greater Los Angeles region and in the Seattle basin; in the CEUS, we introduce a broadband (0.01- to 10-s period) amplification model for the effects of the passive-margin basins of the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains. In addition, we summarize progress on implementing rupture directivity models into seismic hazard models, although they are not incorporated in the 2023 NSHM. We implement the ground-motion characterization for the 2023 NSHM in the US Geological Survey's code for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis, nshmp-haz-v2, and present the sensitivity of hazard to these changes. Hazard calculations indicate widespread effects from adjustments to the CEUS GMMs, from the incorporation of Coastal Plain amplification effects, and from the treatment of shallow-basin and out-of-basin sites in the San Francisco Bay Area and Los Angeles region, as well as locally important changes from subduction-zone GMMs, and from updated and new WUS basins.
引用
收藏
页码:1158 / 1190
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The 2023 US National Seismic Hazard Model: Subduction ground-motion models
    Rezaeian, Sanaz
    Powers, Peter M.
    Altekruse, Jason
    Ahdi, Sean K.
    Petersen, Mark D.
    Shumway, Allison M.
    Frankel, Arthur D.
    Wirth, Erin A.
    Smith, James A.
    Moschetti, Morgan P.
    Withers, Kyle B.
    Herrick, Julie A.
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2024, 40 (03) : 1739 - 1786
  • [2] The Ground-Motion Characterization Model for the 2022 New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model
    Bradley, Brendon A.
    Bora, Sanjay S.
    Lee, Robin L.
    Manea, Elena F.
    Gerstenberger, Matthew C.
    Stafford, Peter J.
    Atkinson, Gail M.
    Weatherill, Graeme
    Hutchinson, Jesse
    de la Torre, Christopher A.
    Hulsey, Anne M.
    Kaiser, Anna E.
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2024, 114 (01) : 329 - 349
  • [3] A Comparison between the Forecast by the United States National Seismic Hazard Maps with Recent Ground-Motion Records
    Mak, Sum
    Schorlemmer, Danijel
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2016, 106 (04) : 1817 - 1831
  • [4] Hazard Sensitivities Associated with Ground-Motion Characterization Modeling for the New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model Revision 2022
    Bora, Sanjay S.
    Bradley, Brendon A.
    Manea, Elena F.
    Gerstenberger, Matthew C.
    Lee, Robin L.
    Stafford, Peter J.
    Atkinson, Gail M.
    Kaiser, Anna
    Dicaprio, Christopher J.
    Van Dissen, Russell J.
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2024, 114 (01) : 422 - 448
  • [5] Ground-motion characterization for the probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in Turkey
    Akkar, Sinan
    Kale, Ozkan
    Yakut, Ahmet
    Ceken, Ulubey
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2018, 16 (08) : 3439 - 3463
  • [6] Ground-motion characterization for the probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in Turkey
    Sinan Akkar
    Özkan Kale
    Ahmet Yakut
    Ulubey Çeken
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 16 : 3439 - 3463
  • [7] Compatible ground-motion time histories for new national seismic hazard maps
    Atkinson, GM
    Beresnev, IA
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1998, 25 (02) : 305 - 318
  • [8] The 2018 update of the US National Seismic Hazard Model: Ground motion models in the western US
    Powers, Peter M.
    Rezaeian, Sanaz
    Shumway, Allison M.
    Petersen, Mark D.
    Luco, Nicolas
    Boyd, Oliver S.
    Moschetti, Morgan P.
    Frankel, Arthur D.
    Thompson, Eric M.
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2021, 37 (04) : 2315 - 2341
  • [9] Evaluation of Empirical Ground-Motion Models for the 2022 New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model Revision
    Lee, Robin L.
    Bradley, Brendon A.
    Manea, Elena F.
    Hutchinson, Jesse A.
    Bora, Sanjay S.
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2024, 114 (01) : 311 - 328
  • [10] On the Ground-Motion Models for Chinese Seismic Hazard Mapping
    Hong, Han Ping
    Feng, Chao
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2019, 109 (05) : 2106 - 2124