Comparing Mid-Upper Arm Circumference With Body Mass Index for Assessing Nutritional Status in Indian Adults: Evidence From the National Family Health Survey 2015-16 (NFHS-4)

被引:0
作者
Negi, Shailender [1 ]
Srinath, Nagapurkar [1 ]
Akshay, Mykala [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Publ Hlth, Publ Hlth, Hyderabad, India
关键词
nfhs-4; mid -upper arm circumference; body mass index; anthropometry; malnutrition; POPULATIONS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.59629
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The surge in the twin burden of malnutrition - undernutrition and overweight/obesity - poses a severe threat worldwide including India. The adult group, primarily considered as an economic pillar of the society, suffered significant health problems, yet their nutritional issues are often neglected. Screening of nutritional status through anthropometric measurements is widely accepted. Body mass index (BMI) is commonly used but has certain limitations. Mid -upper arm circumference (MUAC), another simpler tool, is universally accepted in children, but its use in adults is debatable. The current research aims to determine the MUAC cutoffs and their predictive accuracies corresponding to BMI cutoffs for adult men and nonpregnant women. Subject and methods A cross-sectional analysis was conducted of the anthropometric data of Indian adult men and nonpregnant women collected in 2015-16 via the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to derive the MUAC cutoffs against BMI cutoffs. Results A significant moderate correlation for both men (r=0.56) and women (r=0.68) was observed. In relation to ROC analysis, the MUAC cutoffs against the BMI cutoffs of 18.5, 23, 25, and 30 kg/m 2 were approximated to be 25, 26, 28, and 30 cm for men and 23, 25, 27, and 28 cm for women, respectively. These MUAC cutoffs showed good predictive accuracy with a high range of sensitivity and specificity for both men and women. Conclusions The non-invasive MUAC method correlates very well with BMI and offers several advantages, including accuracy, ease of measurement, and minimal logistical support and training, and can assess the nutritional status even in geographically remote areas. Therefore, it can be an important tool in public health, especially in resource -limited settings, for identifying populations at risk of malnutrition.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, National family health survey, 2015-16: India
[2]  
Bernstein K. J., 2023, 2023 GLOBAL HUNGER I
[3]   Health inequalities research in India: a review of trends and themes in the literature since the 1990s [J].
Bhan, Nandita ;
Rao, Krishna Dipankar ;
Kachwaha, Shivani .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2016, 15 :1-8
[4]   Using middle upper arm circumference to assess severe adult malnutrition during famine [J].
Collins, S .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (05) :391-395
[5]   Mid-upper arm circumference as a substitute of the body mass index for assessment of nutritional status among adult and adolescent females: learning from an impoverished Indian state [J].
Das, A. ;
Saimala, G. ;
Reddy, N. ;
Mishra, P. ;
Giri, R. ;
Kumar, A. ;
Raj, A. ;
Kumar, G. ;
Chaturvedi, S. ;
Babu, S. ;
Srikantiah, S. ;
Mahapatra, T. .
PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 179 :68-75
[6]   The double burden of malnutrition among adults in India: evidence from the National Family Health Survey-4 (2015-16) [J].
Dutta, Mili ;
Selvamani, Y. ;
Singh, Pushpendra ;
Prashad, Lokender .
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND HEALTH, 2019, 41
[7]   Nutritional status of adults among Munda and Pod populations in a peri urban area of Kolkata City, India [J].
Ghosh, R. ;
Bharati, P. .
ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 18 (02) :12-20
[8]   Mid-Upper Arm Circumference Based Nutrition Programming: Evidence for a New Approach in Regions with High Burden of Acute Malnutrition [J].
Goossens, Sylvie ;
Bekele, Yodit ;
Yun, Oliver ;
Harczi, Geza ;
Ouannes, Marie ;
Shepherd, Susan .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (11)
[9]  
JAMES WPT, 1994, EUR J CLIN NUTR, V48, P883
[10]  
Kennedy ET, 2006, AM J CLIN NUTR, V83, p410S