Measuring Exposure to the Hazardous Drinking of Others and Perceived Opportunity to Intervene as a Bystander

被引:2
作者
Barnett, Nancy P. [1 ,2 ]
Haikalis, Michelle [1 ,2 ]
Meisel, Matthew K. [1 ,2 ]
Merrill, Jennifer E. [1 ,2 ]
Jones, Richard N. [3 ]
Rosen, Rochelle K. [2 ]
Carey, Kate B. [1 ,2 ]
Orchowski, Lindsay M. [3 ]
Bradley, Kelli [3 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Alcohol & Addict Studies, Providence, RI USA
[2] Brown Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Behav & Social Sci, Providence, RI USA
[3] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Dept Psychiat & Human Behav, Providence, RI USA
关键词
ALCOHOL-USE; COLLEGE; PREVENTION; STUDENTS; CONSUMPTION; ADULTS; ABUSE; US;
D O I
10.15288/jsad.23-00042
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Excessive alcohol use is very prevalent among young adults, and consequences of drinking are often observed by witnesses. Understanding the circumstances under which witnesses of risky alcohol use help others and whether they perceive these circumstances as an opportunity to engage in bystander intervention are important, but valid measures of these constructs are needed. The current study is a psychometric evaluation of the Exposure to Hazardous Drinking in Others (EHDO) scale and a single -item indicator of Perceived AlcoholRelated Bystander Opportunity (PARBO). Method: Young adults ( N = 1,011; 46.0% women) who reported being around someone who showed signs of alcohol intoxication in the past 3 months were recruited via Qualtrics Panels. The initial item set for the EHDO was developed through qualitative methods and reflected observed or reported risks or consequences. Factor analyses and Item Response Theory analyses were used to reduce and categorize EHDO items, and construct validity was assessed for the EHDO and the PARBO item. Results: An initial set of 33 EHDO items was reduced to 21, representing two factors: Situational Risk Signs and Problematic Pattern. Both factors demonstrated good model fit, internal consistency, and evidence of convergent validity. The PARBO item showed good construct validity but was distinct from the EHDO. Conclusions: These instruments are useful for measuring secondhand alcohol risks in a community and are particularly applicable for evaluating bystander intervention for alcohol risk. ( J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs, 85, 395-403, 2024)
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 403
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2020, National survey of drug use and health (NSDUH) releases
[2]  
Anthenien A M., 2017, Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, V61, P17
[3]   How Do We Know If It Works? Measuring Outcomes in Bystander-Focused Abuse Prevention on Campuses [J].
Banyard, Victoria L. ;
Moynihan, Mary M. ;
Cares, Alison C. ;
Warner, Rebecca .
PSYCHOLOGY OF VIOLENCE, 2014, 4 (01) :101-115
[4]   Measurement and Correlates of Prosocial Bystander Behavior: The Case of Interpersonal Violence [J].
Banyard, Victoria L. .
VIOLENCE AND VICTIMS, 2008, 23 (01) :83-97
[5]  
Brown TA., 2015, CONFIRMATORY FACTOR
[6]   REMARKS ON PARALLEL ANALYSIS [J].
BUJA, A ;
EYUBOGLU, N .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1992, 27 (04) :509-540
[7]   A Situational Model of Sexual Assault Prevention through Bystander Intervention [J].
Burn, Shawn Meghan .
SEX ROLES, 2009, 60 (11-12) :779-792
[8]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2021, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Questionnaire
[9]   RCT Testing Bystander Effectiveness to Reduce Violence [J].
Coker, Ann L. ;
Bush, Heather M. ;
Cook-Craig, Patricia G. ;
DeGue, Sarah A. ;
Clear, Emily R. ;
Brancato, Candace J. ;
Fisher, Bonnie S. ;
Recktenwald, Eileen A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 52 (05) :566-578
[10]   The Bystander-Effect: A Meta-Analytic Review on Bystander Intervention in Dangerous and Non-Dangerous Emergencies [J].
Fischer, Peter ;
Krueger, Joachim I. ;
Greitemeyer, Tobias ;
Vogrincic, Claudia ;
Kastenmueller, Andreas ;
Frey, Dieter ;
Heene, Moritz ;
Wicher, Magdalena ;
Kainbacher, Martina .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2011, 137 (04) :517-537