Machine learning ground motion models for a critical site with long-term earthquake records

被引:0
作者
Zhan, W. W. [1 ]
Chen, Q. S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Civil Environm & Construct Engn, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Clemson Univ, Glenn Dept Civil Engn, Clemson, SC USA
来源
GEOSHANGHAI 2024 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, VOL 5 | 2024年 / 1334卷
关键词
PREDICTION; ACCELERATION; LIQUEFACTION; NGA-WEST2; EQUATIONS;
D O I
10.1088/1755-1315/1334/1/012056
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Ground motion models derived using data from widespread stations and earthquakes induce significant aleatory variability when applied to predict ground motions for a single site. This issue can be even worse when the sites of interest show complex site response characteristics and do not have enough similar sites in the ground motion model development dataset. This work provides a machine-learning-based ground motion modeling framework for sites with numerous earthquake recordings. The Onahama Port Array, a liquefiable site in Japan that has recorded more than 1200 earthquakes in the last 25 years, was selected as a case study. The gradient boosting method was employed to predict response spectra with periods from 0.01 to 10 s for earthquakes with Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) magnitude ranging from 2.4 to 9.0. Different predictor combinations were tested, and two gradient boosting models were recommended: the basic model that requires earthquake magnitude and epicentral distance as inputs, and the optimal model that requires three additional inputs, focal depth, azimuth, and rainfall. The basic and optimal gradient boosting models have the root mean square error of 0.004 and 0.001 g, average r(2) of 5-fold cross validation of 0.915 and 0.983, respectively. The results shed light on seismic hazard assessment for critical sites with long-term earthquake recordings.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Anderson JG., 1999, SEISMOL RES LETT, V70, P19, DOI [DOI 10.1785/GSSRL.70.1.19, 10.1785/gssrl.70.1.19]
[2]   NGA-West2 Equations for Predicting PGA, PGV, and 5% Damped PSA for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes [J].
Boore, David M. ;
Stewart, Jonathan P. ;
Seyhan, Emel ;
Atkinson, Gail M. .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2014, 30 (03) :1057-1085
[3]   Site-Condition Proxies, Ground Motion Variability, and Data-Driven GMPEs: Insights from the NGA-West2 and RESORCE Data Sets [J].
Derras, Boumediene ;
Bard, Pierre-Yves ;
Cotton, Fabrice .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2016, 32 (04) :2027-2056
[4]   Towards fully data driven ground-motion prediction models for Europe [J].
Derras, Boumediene ;
Bard, Pierre Yves ;
Cotton, Fabrice .
BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2014, 12 (01) :495-516
[5]   Earthquake ground motion estimation using strong-motion records: a review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and response spectral ordinates [J].
Douglas, J .
EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2003, 61 (1-2) :43-104
[6]   Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine [J].
Friedman, JH .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2001, 29 (05) :1189-1232
[7]   Ground motion amplification models for Japan using machine learning techniques [J].
Kim, Sunyul ;
Hwang, Youngdeok ;
Seo, Hwanwoo ;
Kim, Byungmin .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2020, 132
[8]   The timing of liquefaction and its utility in liquefaction hazard evaluation [J].
Kramer, S. L. ;
Sideras, S. S. ;
Greenfield, M. W. .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2016, 91 :133-146
[9]   Hybrid predictor for ground-motion intensity with machine learning and conventional ground motion prediction equation [J].
Kubo, Hisahiko ;
Kunugi, Takashi ;
Suzuki, Wataru ;
Suzuki, Shingo ;
Aoi, Shin .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
[10]   A Nonergodic Ground-Motion Model for California with Spatially Varying Coefficients [J].
Landwehr, Niels ;
Kuehn, Nicolas M. ;
Scheffer, Tobias ;
Abrahamson, Norman .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2016, 106 (06) :2574-2583