Improving the Load Flexibility of Stratified Electric Water Heaters: Design and Experimental Validation of MPC Strategies

被引:6
作者
Buechler, Elizabeth [1 ]
Goldin, Aaron [2 ]
Rajagopal, Ram [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Water heating; Temperature measurement; Resistance heating; Optimization; Load modeling; Temperature sensors; Temperature distribution; Water heaters; model predictive control; load control; demand flexibility; residential loads; DEMAND RESPONSE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1109/TSG.2024.3366116
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Residential electric water heaters have significant load shifting capabilities due to their thermal heat capacity and large energy consumption. Model predictive control (MPC) has been shown to be an effective control strategy to enable water heater load shifting in home energy management systems. In this work, we analyze how modeling tank stratification in an MPC formulation impacts control performance for stratified electric water heaters under time-of-use (TOU) rates. Specifically, we propose an MPC formulation based on a three-node thermal model that captures tank stratification, and compare it to a one-node formulation that does not capture stratification and a standard thermostatic controller. These strategies are compared through both real-time laboratory testing and simulation-based evaluation for different water use patterns. Laboratory experiments show cost reductions of 12.3-23.2% for the one-node MPC and 31.2-42.5% for the three-node MPC relative to the thermostatic controller. The performance of the one-node MPC is limited by significant plant-model mismatch, while the three-node formulation better approximates real-world dynamics and results in much more effective cost reduction and load shifting. A simple analysis of how each strategy performs under water use forecast errors is also provided.
引用
收藏
页码:3613 / 3623
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Ahmed Awadelrahman M.A., 2017, ENERGY POWER ENG, V9, P112, DOI DOI 10.4236/EPE.2017.94B014
[2]   CasADi: a software framework for nonlinear optimization and optimal control [J].
Andersson, Joel A. E. ;
Gillis, Joris ;
Horn, Greg ;
Rawlings, James B. ;
Diehl, Moritz .
MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING COMPUTATION, 2019, 11 (01) :1-36
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Heat pump water heater model validation study
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Residential Energy Consumption Survey
[5]   Experimental validation of a state-of-the-art model predictive control approach for demand side management with a hot water heat pump [J].
Baumann, Christian ;
Huber, Gerhard ;
Alavanja, Jovan ;
Preissinger, Markus ;
Kepplinger, Peter .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2023, 285
[6]  
Biagioni David J., 2020, RLEM'20: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Reinforcement Learning for Energy Management in Buildings & Cities, P29, DOI 10.1145/3427773.3427872
[7]   Home energy management under realistic and uncertain conditions: A comparison of heuristic, deterministic, and stochastic control methods [J].
Blonsky, Michael ;
McKenna, Killian ;
Maguire, Jeff ;
Vincent, Tyrone .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2022, 325
[8]  
Borrelli F., 2017, Predictive Control Linear Hybrid Systems., DOI DOI 10.1017/9781139061759
[9]  
Carew N, 2018, Heat pump water heater electric load shifting: A modeling study
[10]  
Cui B., 2019, Rep. TR-ORNL/SPR-2019/1210