Aspects of acceptance: building a shared conceptual understanding

被引:0
|
作者
Mrazek, Michael D. [1 ,2 ]
Dow, Bailey R. [3 ]
Richelle, Justine [4 ]
Pasch, Alexander M. [4 ]
Godderis, Nathan [4 ]
Pamensky, Talia A. [4 ]
Rutila, Bryce A. [4 ]
Mrazek, Alissa J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston UTHealth, Sch Publ Hlth, Austin, TX 77030 USA
[2] Michael & Susan Ctr Hlth Living, Austin, TX 78701 USA
[3] Univ South Carolina, Sch Psychol, Dept Psychol, Columbia, SC USA
[4] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Psychol, Appl Psychol Lab, Austin, TX 78712 USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2024年 / 15卷
关键词
acceptance; acknowledgement; allowing; non-judgment; non-attachment; EXPERIENTIAL AVOIDANCE; COMMITMENT THERAPY; BEHAVIOR-THERAPY; MINDFULNESS; MODEL; DEFINITIONS; MECHANISMS; MONITOR; GRIEF; MIND;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1423976
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Many contemplatives, scientists, and clinicians have pointed to the value of responding to life's difficulties by accepting experiences as they are. A growing body of research also suggests that acceptance contributes to effective coping with adversity, reduced stress, and improved emotional well-being. Yet within the scientific literature, there is little consensus on what acceptance means or how it should be measured. This makes it nearly impossible to synthesize empirical work on acceptance into a cohesive scientific understanding. Our goal in this paper is to clarify four facets of acceptance that are commonly referenced in research: acknowledging, allowing, non-judging, and non-attachment. We do not propose a specific definition of acceptance or even a set of privileged facets that must be included in future frameworks. We instead offer a vocabulary to facilitate productive communication among researchers that will, in turn, enable a more definitive scientific understanding of this important construct to emerge. After defining and explaining these aspects of acceptance, we further clarify these constructs in two ways. First, we illustrate how the four aspects are dissociable from one another. Second, we analyze their correspondence to related constructs from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). Finally, we provide a concept worksheet that scholars can utilize to precisely operationalize acceptance in their own work.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Understanding technology acceptance in a mandatory environment: A literature review
    Hwang, Yujong
    Al-Arabiat, Mohanned
    Shin, Dong-Hee
    INFORMATION DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 32 (04) : 1266 - 1283
  • [42] The relationship between biology teachers' understanding of the nature of science and the understanding and acceptance of the theory of evolution
    Cofre, Hernan
    Cuevas, Emilia
    Becerra, Beatriz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2017, 39 (16) : 2243 - 2260
  • [43] A shared understanding of good writing? Exploring teachers' perspectives
    Clarkson, Rebecca
    WRITING & PEDAGOGY, 2022, 14 (03): : 267 - 295
  • [44] Mindfulness:: Conceptual aspects and results of the Freiburg mindfulness inventory
    Heidenreich, Thomas
    Stroehle, Gunnar
    Michalak, Johannes
    VERHALTENSTHERAPIE, 2006, 16 (01) : 33 - 40
  • [45] Conceptual Alignment: How Brains Achieve Mutual Understanding
    Stolk, Arjen
    Verhagen, Lennart
    Toni, Ivan
    TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2016, 20 (03) : 180 - 191
  • [46] ASSESSMENT OF CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING IN STUDENT LEARNING OF MOON PHASES
    Zou, Yi
    Jin, Lizhen
    Huang, Xiao
    Li, Yanbing
    JOURNAL OF BALTIC SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2023, 22 (04): : 719 - 736
  • [47] Towards a Conceptual Model of User Acceptance of Location-Based Emergency Services
    Aloudat, Anas
    Michael, Katina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AMBIENT COMPUTING AND INTELLIGENCE, 2013, 5 (02) : 17 - 34
  • [48] Mindfulness- and acceptance-based interventions for psychosis: Our current understanding and a meta-analysis
    Louise, Stephanie
    Fitzpatrick, Molly
    Strauss, Clara
    Rossell, Susan L.
    Thomas, Neil
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2018, 192 : 57 - 63
  • [50] A conceptual framework for Industry 4.0 acceptance and adoption in the construction industry: a systematic review
    Perera, C. Savindi Ranthika
    Francis, Valerie
    Gao, Shang
    CONSTRUCTION INNOVATION-ENGLAND, 2025,