The Ethics of Scholarly Book Reviewing

被引:0
作者
Gump, Steven E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Off Citizen Scholar Dev, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA
关键词
book reviews; ethics; relationships in publishing; scholarly book reviewing;
D O I
10.3138/jsp-2023-0073
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Post-publication scholarly book reviews, as acts of public assessment, draw attention to the contributions of recently published scholarly works. The various actors in the production and consumption of scholarly book reviews-authors, publishers, reviewers, book review editors, readers-bring different expectations to such reviews. As evaluators, reviewers must strive for accurate and appropriate descriptions and assessments that are objective, fair, unbiased, and without conflicts of interest. Questions of ethics can arise in many ways. This article describes the key relationships in the production of scholarly book reviews, emphasizing several ethical dimensions that reviewers should keep in mind at all stages of the reviewing process.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 403
页数:19
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], The prevailing myth is that research is a solo activity, best left to the lonely scho-lar toiling alone in some lonely office
  • [2] Ashley LRN, 2002, J INFORM ETHICS, V11, P37
  • [3] Publishing in Small Business Economics: An Entrepreneurship Journal
    Audretsch, David B.
    Guenther, Christina
    Lederer, Adam
    [J]. SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2022, 58 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [4] Balin Robert D., Small Press12, P46
  • [5] Batten Bruce L., Jour-nal of Scholarly Publishing53, P63, DOI [10.3138/jsp.53.2.01.39, DOI 10.3138/JSP.53.2.01.39]
  • [6] Bloom Lynn Z., Journal ofInformation Ethics11, P7
  • [7] Brunelle Gayle K., Inside Higher Ed, V31October2022
  • [8] Chenail Ronald J., The Qualitative Report15, P1635, DOI [10.46743/2160-3715/2010.1369.25, DOI 10.46743/2160-3715/2010.1369.25]
  • [9] Chong PK, 2020, PRINC STUD CULT, P1
  • [10] Cortada James W., Journal of Scho-larly Publishing30, P34