Effective schematic design phase in design process

被引:0
作者
Abdullah, Samira Mohamed Ahmed [1 ,2 ]
Toulan, Naila Mohamed Farid [1 ]
Amen, Ayman Abdel-Hamid [2 ]
机构
[1] Cairo Univ, Fac Engn, Architectural Dept, Giza, Egypt
[2] Benha Univ, Fac Engn, Architectural Dept, Banha, Egypt
关键词
Design thinking; Design process; Schematic design; Problem solving; Visualization; Analysis and synthesis; ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; STUDIO;
D O I
10.1007/s10798-024-09890-w
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Design thinking is a way to create solid designs that responds to design problems and solve it in a creative and suitable way. However, it is not widely recognized in architectural education pedagogy in Egypt for undergraduate. Despite being very efficient in several business avenues but not in architectural pedagogy. So, this paper aims to spot the light on design thinking and the possibility of its usage in design process to help students have a successful architectural project that solves the design problems and face the site challenges through the use of visualization design thinking tool. Where students face a challenge in translating the verbal language of their collected data in the research phase to the architectural language in the schematic phase. There is a recognized gap between the research students perform in the beginning of design project and the schematic designs that students deliver. The study proposes the possibility of using visualization as a tool for design thinking to have a sufficient and successful schematic design phase. The study will explain how students could apply design thinking in architectural design to benefit from their research phase in their schematic design. Moreover, come up with solutions and variable ideas using the tools of deign thinking as a way for helping in delivering design problem solution and have a more effective schematic design. At the end of the research paper the study concludes how the students can use visualization tool to translate the verbal language to architectural language and the possibility for using design thinking. That to help students realize the importance of analysis phase in synthesis. The research follows descriptive method and quantitative analysis where first the descriptive method is used in illustrating design process and design thinking. Then the quantitative analysis in the experiment is done followed by a survey to prove research problem and help in proposing the solution.
引用
收藏
页码:2005 / 2039
页数:35
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] AIA, 2007, Schematic design, P57, DOI [10.1007/1-56898-663-73, DOI 10.1007/1-56898-663-73]
  • [2] Akin O., 1996, Design Studies, V17, P341, DOI 10.1016/S0142-694X(96)00024-5
  • [3] Arnold J. E., 2016, Creative engineering promoting innovation by thinking differently
  • [4] Brown T, 2008, HARVARD BUS REV, V86, P84
  • [5] An investigation of design studio performance in relation to creativity, spatial ability, and visual cognitive style
    Cho, Ji Young
    [J]. THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2017, 23 : 67 - 78
  • [6] Cross N., 2011, DESIGN THINKING UNDE, DOI DOI 10.5040/9781474293884
  • [7] A personal matter? An investigation of students' design process experiences when using a heuristic or a systematic method
    Daalhuizen, Jaap
    Person, Oscar
    Gattol, Valentin
    [J]. DESIGN STUDIES, 2014, 35 (02) : 133 - 159
  • [8] DARKE J., 1979, DESIGN STUDIAA, V1, P36, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0142-694X(79)90027-9, 10.1016/0142-694X(79)90027-9]
  • [9] Demirba OO., 2003, Design Studies, V24, P437, DOI [10.1016/S0142-694X(03)00013-9, DOI 10.1016/S0142-694X(03)00013-9]
  • [10] Experiential learning with building craft in the architectural design studio: A pilot study exploring its implications for built heritage in the UK
    Djabarouti, Johnathan
    O'Flaherty, Christopher
    [J]. THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2019, 32 : 102 - 113