Business ecosystem dynamics in the Chinese electric vehicle market: co-evolution of capabilities and dynamics

被引:4
作者
Dixon, Timothy David [1 ]
Wei, Jiuchang [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, 96 JinZhai Rd, Hefei 230026, Anhui, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Business ecosystem; dynamics; capabilities; co-evolution; electric vehicles; China; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; INNOVATION ECOSYSTEMS; VALUE CREATION; TECHNOLOGY; CONSTRUCT; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1080/19761597.2024.2355239
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Business Ecosystems (BEs) are, fundamentally, interaction systems of independent yet mutually dependent actors, but few studies have investigated the dynamic capabilities among the ecosystem stakeholders that drive the co-evolution process. To address this research gap, this paper explores the ecosystem stakeholder dynamics that influence firms in the automotive technology business ecosystem of Hefei, China. Guided by a proposed BE framework and using an exploratory abductive approach, qualitative data from semi-structured interviews were collected and analysed. After data collection and analysis of three Chinese electric vehicle case studies, the main findings of this paper are as follows. We introduce a Business Ecosystem Capabilities Framework (BECF) consisting of the Business Ecosystem Capabilities (BECs) at each phase of ecosystem development and the Business Ecosystem Dynamic Capabilities (BEDCs) that enable the ecosystem to transform to the next phase. Business Ecosystem Capabilities have four dimensions - Ecosystem Fertility, Ecosystem Enrichment, Ecosystem Strengthening, and Ecosystem Connectivity - with 12 subdimensions. The study provides valuable contributions to academics, consultants, and managers interested in BEs while also extending the literature on the emerging electric vehicle market currently disrupting the established automotive ecosystem.
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 282
页数:39
相关论文
共 113 条
[1]  
Adner R., 2012, WIDE LENS NEW STRATE
[2]   Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy [J].
Adner, Ron .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2017, 43 (01) :39-58
[3]   Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re-examining technology S-curves [J].
Adner, Ron ;
Kapoor, Rahul .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 37 (04) :625-648
[4]   VALUE CREATION IN INNOVATION ECOSYSTEMS: HOW THE STRUCTURE OF TECHNOLOGICAL INTERDEPENDENCE AFFECTS FIRM PERFORMANCE IN NEW TECHNOLOGY GENERATIONS [J].
Adner, Ron ;
Kapoor, Rahul .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (03) :306-333
[5]   Are network effects really all about size? The role of structure and conduct [J].
Afuah, Allan .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (03) :257-273
[6]   Strategic business performance through network capability and structural flexibility [J].
Anser, Muhammad Khalid ;
Yousaf, Zahid ;
Usman, Muhammad ;
Yousaf, Seemab ;
Fatima, Naseem ;
Hussain, Hadi ;
Waheed, Junaid .
MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2021, 59 (02) :426-445
[7]  
Autio E, 2018, Academy of Management Proceedings, V2018, P15913, DOI [10.5465/ambpp.2018.15913abstract, 10.5465/AMBPP.2018.15913abstract, DOI 10.5465/AMBPP.2018.15913ABSTRACT, 10.5465/ambpp.2018.15913abstract]
[8]  
Banka K., 2021, IEEE TECHN ENG MAN C
[9]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120
[10]  
Barney J.B., 2001, HDB STRATEGIC MANAGE, P124, DOI DOI 10.1111/B.9780631218616.2006.X