Parenting, Child Maltreatment, and Social Disadvantage: A Population-Based Implementation and Evaluation of the Triple P System of Evidence-Based Parenting Support

被引:4
作者
Sanders, Matthew R. [1 ,2 ]
Clague, Denise [2 ,3 ]
Zajac, Tomasz [2 ,3 ]
Baxter, Janeen [2 ,3 ]
Western, Mark [2 ,3 ]
Chainey, Carys [1 ,2 ]
Morawska, Alina [1 ,2 ]
Tomaszewski, Wojtek [2 ,3 ]
Prinz, Ronald J. [4 ]
Burke, Kylie [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Parenting & Family Support Ctr, Sch Psychol, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Australian Res Council, Ctr Excellence Children & Families Life Course, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Inst Social Sci Res, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ South Carolina, Res Ctr Child Well Being, Columbia, SC USA
[5] Metro North Hlth Serv Mental Hlth, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
prevention; child maltreatment; population-based; parenting; evidence-based parenting support; PREVENTION; PREVALENCE; FAMILY;
D O I
10.1177/10775595241259994
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Child Maltreatment (CM) is a widespread public health problem, with adverse outcomes for children, families, and communities. Evidence-based parenting support delivered via a public health approach may be an effective means to prevent CM. The Every Family 2 population trial applied a public health approach to delivering evidence-based parenting support to prevent CM in disadvantaged communities. Using a quasi-experimental design, 64 matched low socioeconomic communities in the Australian states of Queensland and New South Wales received either the full multi-level Triple P system (TPS) of parenting support, or Care as Usual (CAU). Two population indicators of CM, the number of substantiated cases of CM, and the number of notifications of CM to protective services were compared using Welch's t-test to evaluate intervention effectiveness. After two years of intervention, medium to large effect sizes favoring TPS communities were found for substantiations (d = 0.57, p < .05) and notifications (d = 1.86, p < .001). These findings show the value of the TPS, deployed using a public health approach, in efforts to prevent CM in socially disadvantaged communities. A number of uncontrolled contextual factors are described that may have contributed to some of the differences detected between TPS and CAU communities.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 191
页数:15
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Jandu Yani U (for all families): evaluating Indigenous Triple P, a community-tailored parenting support program in remote Aboriginal communities [J].
Andersson, Ellaina ;
Mcilduff, Cari ;
Turner, Karen M. T. ;
Carter, Emily ;
Hand, Marmingee ;
Thomas, Sue ;
Davies, Jadnah ;
Einfeld, Stewart ;
Elliott, Elizabeth J. .
AUSTRALIAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2024, 59 (03) :245-259
[2]   Risk and Protective Factors for Child Maltreatment: a Review [J].
Austin, Anna E. ;
Lesak, Alexandria M. ;
Shanahan, Meghan E. .
CURRENT EPIDEMIOLOGY REPORTS, 2020, 7 (04) :334-342
[3]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2021, AUSTRALINA STAT GEOG
[4]  
Australian Government Productivity Commission, 2021, REP GOV SERV 2021 F
[5]  
Canavan, 2014, PARENTING SUPPORT EV
[6]  
Carmona R. H., 2006, MAKING PREVENTION CH
[7]   A Systematic Review of Reviews of the Outcome of Noninstitutional Child Maltreatment [J].
Carr, Alan ;
Duff, Hollie ;
Craddock, Fiona .
TRAUMA VIOLENCE & ABUSE, 2020, 21 (04) :828-843
[8]   Effects of Parenting Programs on Child Maltreatment Prevention: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Chen, Mengtong ;
Chan, Ko Ling .
TRAUMA VIOLENCE & ABUSE, 2016, 17 (01) :88-104
[9]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587
[10]  
Council of Australian Governments, 2009, AUSTR GOVT