Feasibility of Extended Postoperative Follow-Up in Patients With Gastric Cancer

被引:4
|
作者
Lee, Ju-Hee [1 ]
Kim, Jiyeong [2 ,3 ]
Choi, Ji Yoon [1 ]
机构
[1] Hanyang Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg, 222 Wangsimni Ro, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Hanyang Univ, Coll Med, Dept Premed, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Hanyang Univ, Med Res Collaborating Ctr, Biostat Lab, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
SURVEILLANCE; GASTRECTOMY; SURVIVAL; RECURRENCE; SURGERY; VERSION;
D O I
10.1001/jamasurg.2024.1753
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Importance Conventional research and guidelines on postgastrectomy follow-up for gastric cancer often restrict their focus to the first 5 years after surgery. ObjectiveTo evaluate the association of extended regular follow-up after 5 years postgastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer with overall and postrecurrence survival rates. Design, Setting, and Participants This population-based, retrospective cohort study used Korean National Health Insurance claims data extracted between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2014, with follow-up data examined until December 31, 2021. Patients without recurrence or other cancers at 5 years postgastrectomy were divided into 2 groups: those who had extended regular follow-up visits and those who did not. The data were analyzed between August 15 and November 15, 2023. Exposures Regular follow-up vs irregular follow-up after 5 years postgastrectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome was whether extended regular follow-up after 5 years postgastrectomy was independently associated with overall and postrecurrence survival rates using Cox proportional hazards regression. Postrecurrence survival rates were also compared across different follow-up methods and intervals. Results A total of 40 468 patients with gastric cancer were included, with 14 294 in the regular follow-up group (mean [SD] age, 61.3 [11.7] years; 9669 male [67.8%]) and 26 174 in the irregular follow-up group (mean [SD] age, 58.1 [11.1] years; 18 007 male [68.8%]). Late recurrence or gastric remnant cancer (GRC) was identified in 3138 patients (7.8%), including 1610 of 40 468 patients (4.0%) between 5 and 10 years postgastrectomy and 1528 of 16 287 (9.4%) patients after 10 years postgastrectomy. Regular follow-up was associated with a significantly decreased overall mortality rate after 5 years postgastrectomy (from 49.4% to 36.9% in 15-year mortality rate; P < .001), as well as significant improvement of postrecurrence survival rate after occurrence of late recurrence or GRC (from 32.7% to 71.1% in 5-year postrecurrence survival rate; P < .001). Comparison of follow-up methods revealed that the combination of endoscopy and abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) (only abdominopelvic CT in total gastrectomy subgroup) yielded the highest 5-year postrecurrence survival rate (endoscopy alone vs abdominopelvic CT alone vs a combination of both, 54.5% vs 47.1% vs 74.5%, respectively). A time interval of more than 2 years between previous endoscopy or abdominopelvic CT and late recurrence and GRC diagnosis was associated with a significantly reduced postrecurrence survival rate (hazard ratio, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.45-2.04] and 1.48 [95% CI, 1.25-1.75], respectively). Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that extended regular follow-up after 5 years postgastrectomy should be implemented clinically and that current practice and value of follow-up protocols in postoperative care of patients with gastric cancer be reconsidered.
引用
收藏
页码:1009 / 1017
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Postoperative follow-up programs improve survival in curatively resected gastric and junctional cancer patients: a propensity score matched analysis
    Leila Sisic
    Moritz J. Strowitzki
    Susanne Blank
    Henrik Nienhueser
    Sara Dorr
    Georg Martin Haag
    Dirk Jäger
    Katja Ott
    Markus W. Büchler
    Alexis Ulrich
    Thomas Schmidt
    Gastric Cancer, 2018, 21 : 552 - 568
  • [32] Postoperative follow-up programs improve survival in curatively resected gastric and junctional cancer patients: a propensity score matched analysis
    Sisic, Leila
    Strowitzki, Moritz J.
    Blank, Susanne
    Nienhueser, Henrik
    Dorr, Sara
    Haag, Georg Martin
    Jaeger, Dirk
    Ott, Katja
    Buechler, Markus W.
    Ulrich, Alexis
    Schmidt, Thomas
    GASTRIC CANCER, 2018, 21 (03) : 552 - 568
  • [33] Postoperative follow-up of gastric adenocarcinoma with neoplastic markers and 18-FDG-PET/TC
    Patriti, Alberto
    Graziosi, Luigina
    Baffa, Nicodemo
    Pacifico, Eugenio
    Lamprini, Papaefthimiou
    Valiani, Saverio
    Gulla, Nino
    Donini, Amnibale
    ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA, 2007, 78 (06) : 481 - 485
  • [34] Surveillance of Patients with Head and Neck Cancer with an Intensive Clinical and Radiologic Follow-up
    Imbimbo, Martina
    Alfieri, Salvatore
    Botta, Laura
    Bergamini, Cristiana
    Gloghini, Annunziata
    Calareso, Giuseppina
    Orlandi, Ester
    Iacovelli, Nicola Alessandro
    Guzzo, Marco
    Granata, Roberta
    Resteghini, Carlo
    Locati, Laura
    Volpi, Chiara Costanza
    Licitra, Lisa
    Bossi, Paolo
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2019, 161 (04) : 635 - 642
  • [35] Symptomatic Recurrence and Survival Outcomes After Curative Treatment of Gastric Cancer: Does Intensive Follow-up Evaluation Improve Survival?
    Diniz, Thiago Pereira
    da Costa Jr, Wilson L.
    Gomes, Camila Couto
    de Jesus, Victor Hugo F.
    Felismino, Tiago C.
    Torres, Silvio Melo
    Ribeiro, Heber S. C.
    Diniz, Alessandro L.
    de Godoy, Andre Luis
    de Farias, Igor Correia
    Dias-Neto, Emmanuel
    Curado, Maria Paula
    Coimbra, Felipe J. F.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (01) : 274 - 284
  • [36] Design and verification of individualized follow-up strategy of colonoscopy for postoperative patients with colorectal cancer
    Guo, Chunmei
    Wu, Jing
    Jiao, Yue
    Zhang, Qian
    Wang, Canghai
    Wang, Yadan
    Liu, Hong
    Zhang, Shutian
    Wei, Nan
    Lin, Wu
    Liu, Kuiliang
    Shi, Haiyun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 34 (01) : 48 - 55
  • [37] Evidence-based follow-up in lung cancer? Focusing on the risk group of recently operated patients
    Ng, Caecilia
    Pircher, Andreas
    Augustin, Florian
    Kocher, Florian
    MEMO-MAGAZINE OF EUROPEAN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 13 (01) : 73 - 77
  • [38] Literature review of evidence-based follow-up strategies of cancer patients
    Karadi Oszkar
    Mangel Laszlo Csaba
    ORVOSI HETILAP, 2022, 163 (43) : 1704 - 1712
  • [39] Follow-up outcomes of endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer with undifferentiated histology
    Jie-Hyun Kim
    Yong Hoon Kim
    Da Hyun Jung
    Han Ho Jeon
    Yong Chan Lee
    Hyuk Lee
    Sang Kil Lee
    Jun Chul Park
    Sung Kwan Shin
    Young Hoon Youn
    Hyojin Park
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2014, 28 : 2627 - 2633
  • [40] Intensive follow-up vs conventional follow-up for patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer treated with curative intent: A meta-analysis
    Cui, Li-Li
    Cui, Shi-Qi
    Qu, Zhong
    Ren, Zhen-Qing
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 15 (12)