Feasibility of Extended Postoperative Follow-Up in Patients With Gastric Cancer

被引:4
|
作者
Lee, Ju-Hee [1 ]
Kim, Jiyeong [2 ,3 ]
Choi, Ji Yoon [1 ]
机构
[1] Hanyang Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg, 222 Wangsimni Ro, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Hanyang Univ, Coll Med, Dept Premed, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Hanyang Univ, Med Res Collaborating Ctr, Biostat Lab, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
SURVEILLANCE; GASTRECTOMY; SURVIVAL; RECURRENCE; SURGERY; VERSION;
D O I
10.1001/jamasurg.2024.1753
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Importance Conventional research and guidelines on postgastrectomy follow-up for gastric cancer often restrict their focus to the first 5 years after surgery. ObjectiveTo evaluate the association of extended regular follow-up after 5 years postgastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer with overall and postrecurrence survival rates. Design, Setting, and Participants This population-based, retrospective cohort study used Korean National Health Insurance claims data extracted between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2014, with follow-up data examined until December 31, 2021. Patients without recurrence or other cancers at 5 years postgastrectomy were divided into 2 groups: those who had extended regular follow-up visits and those who did not. The data were analyzed between August 15 and November 15, 2023. Exposures Regular follow-up vs irregular follow-up after 5 years postgastrectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome was whether extended regular follow-up after 5 years postgastrectomy was independently associated with overall and postrecurrence survival rates using Cox proportional hazards regression. Postrecurrence survival rates were also compared across different follow-up methods and intervals. Results A total of 40 468 patients with gastric cancer were included, with 14 294 in the regular follow-up group (mean [SD] age, 61.3 [11.7] years; 9669 male [67.8%]) and 26 174 in the irregular follow-up group (mean [SD] age, 58.1 [11.1] years; 18 007 male [68.8%]). Late recurrence or gastric remnant cancer (GRC) was identified in 3138 patients (7.8%), including 1610 of 40 468 patients (4.0%) between 5 and 10 years postgastrectomy and 1528 of 16 287 (9.4%) patients after 10 years postgastrectomy. Regular follow-up was associated with a significantly decreased overall mortality rate after 5 years postgastrectomy (from 49.4% to 36.9% in 15-year mortality rate; P < .001), as well as significant improvement of postrecurrence survival rate after occurrence of late recurrence or GRC (from 32.7% to 71.1% in 5-year postrecurrence survival rate; P < .001). Comparison of follow-up methods revealed that the combination of endoscopy and abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) (only abdominopelvic CT in total gastrectomy subgroup) yielded the highest 5-year postrecurrence survival rate (endoscopy alone vs abdominopelvic CT alone vs a combination of both, 54.5% vs 47.1% vs 74.5%, respectively). A time interval of more than 2 years between previous endoscopy or abdominopelvic CT and late recurrence and GRC diagnosis was associated with a significantly reduced postrecurrence survival rate (hazard ratio, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.45-2.04] and 1.48 [95% CI, 1.25-1.75], respectively). Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that extended regular follow-up after 5 years postgastrectomy should be implemented clinically and that current practice and value of follow-up protocols in postoperative care of patients with gastric cancer be reconsidered.
引用
收藏
页码:1009 / 1017
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The histopathological features and their prognostic impact in the postoperative follow-up of colorectal cancer patients
    Patrascu, Stefan
    Cercelaru, Liliana
    Graure, Giorgiana Maria
    Firut, Maria Andreea
    Rotaru, Ionela
    Cartu, Dan
    Marinescu, Daniela
    Patrascu, Ana Maria
    Radu, Rszvan Ilie
    Mitroi, George
    Surlin, Valeriu
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY AND EMBRYOLOGY, 2022, 63 (03) : 555 - 561
  • [22] Results of Surgical Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer. Case Series with Follow-Up
    Manterola, Carlos
    Claros, Nataniel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY, 2020, 38 (05): : 1479 - 1484
  • [23] Natural History of Gastric Cancer: Observational Study of Gastric Cancer Patients Not Treated During Follow-Up
    Oh, Seung-Young
    Lee, Jeong-Hwan
    Lee, Hyuk-Joon
    Kim, Tae Han
    Huh, Yeon-Ju
    Ahn, Hye-Seong
    Suh, Yun-Suhk
    Kong, Seong-Ho
    Kim, Ga Hee
    Ahn, Su Joa
    Kim, Se Hyung
    Choi, Yunhee
    Yang, Han-Kwang
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 (09) : 2905 - 2911
  • [24] Critical review of the follow-up protocol for head and neck cancer patients
    Kyto, E.
    Haapio, E.
    Minn, H.
    Irjala, H.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2019, 133 (05) : 424 - 429
  • [25] Handsewn Versus Stapled Gastroduodenostomy in Patients with Gastric Cancer: Long-Term Follow-up of a Randomized Clinical Trial
    Kim, Taebong
    Yu, Wansik
    Chung, Hoyoung
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 35 (05) : 1026 - 1029
  • [26] Postherapeutic follow-up of colorectal cancer patients treated with curative intent
    Mazilu, L.
    Ciufu, N.
    Galan, M.
    Suceveanu, A. I.
    Suceveanu, A. P.
    Parepa, I. R.
    Tofolean, D.
    CHIRURGIA, 2012, 107 (01) : 55 - 58
  • [27] Follow-up of patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma
    Baia, Marco
    Ford, Samuel J.
    Dumitra, Sinziana
    Sama, Laura
    Naumann, David N.
    Spolverato, Gaya
    Callegaro, Dario
    EJSO, 2023, 49 (06): : 1125 - 1132
  • [28] The role of follow-up endoscopy after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer
    Lee, SY
    Lee, JH
    Hwang, NC
    Kim, YH
    Rhee, PL
    Kim, JJ
    Paik, SW
    Rhee, JC
    Sohn, TS
    Kim, S
    EJSO, 2005, 31 (03): : 265 - 269
  • [29] How to follow-up patients with epithelial ovarian cancer
    Miller, Rowan E.
    Rustin, Gordon J. S.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY, 2010, 22 (05) : 498 - 502
  • [30] Detection of secondary upper gastrointestinal tract cancer during follow-up esophagogastroduodenoscopy after gastrectomy for gastric cancer
    Nakane, Kosuke
    Fujiya, Keiichi
    Terashima, Masanori
    Kawabata, Takanori
    Matsumoto, Yosuke
    Kamiya, Satoshi
    Hikage, Makoto
    Tanizawa, Yutaka
    Ono, Hiroyuki
    Bando, Etsuro
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2022, 6 (04): : 486 - 495