Effect of arm position on image quality and radiation dose during thorax and abdomen computed tomography scans

被引:0
作者
Buchhave, E. O. [1 ]
Rasmussen, C. D. [1 ]
Lentz, R. [2 ]
Frederiksen, E. H. [3 ]
Kipp, J. O. [4 ]
Leftes, M. O. [5 ]
机构
[1] Reg Hosp Nordjylland, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Barfredsvej 83, DK-9900 Frederikshavn, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Sect 1-2,Palle Juul Jensens Blvd 99, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Sect 1-2-3,Palle Juul Jensens Blvd 99, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Aarhus Univ, Dept Clin Med, Palle Juul Jensens Blvd 99, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark
[5] Univ Collage Northern Denmark, Dept Radiog, Selma Lagerlofs Vej 2, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
Computed tomography; Arm positioning; Radiation dose; Image noise; Image quality; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.radi.2024.04.015
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction: During Computed Tomography (CT) scans of the Thorax-Abdomen-Pelvis (TAP) the patient's arms should be positioned above the head to obtain optimal image quality and expose the patient to the lowest possible radiation dose. This may be impossible with patients with shoulder problems leading to arms being positioned in other ways. This study aimed to investigate differences in objective image quality and estimated effective dose (E), when positioning the arms below shoulder level in CT-TAP. Methods: An anthropomorphic phantom with cadaver arms was used. Four arm positions were tested: Along the torso (A), on the pelvis (B), on a pillow on the pelvis (C), and one arm on pillow on the pelvis and the other arm on the pelvis (D). A Siemens SOMATOM Definition Flash CT-scanner with CareDose 4D was used. The dose length product was read to estimate E. Image quality was assessed objectively by measuring noise within the region of interest in the liver and urinary bladder. Results: Significant differences in E between all arm positions were seen (p 1/4 0.005). The lowest E was obtained in position C, reducing E by 8.42%. Position A provided the best image quality but the highest E. Conclusion: This study showed no unequivocal optimal positioning of arms in CT-TAP. Position A provided the best object image quality, while position C yielded the lowest E. These results may impact the planning of diagnostic CT where positioning of arms may influence optimal image quality and radiation dose. Implication for practice: This study illustrates tendencies for objective image quality and E when arms are positioned below shoulder level. Further research is needed to assess the clinical relevance with the diagnostic potential. (c) 2024 The College of Radiographers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1035 / 1040
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2022, Report
  • [2] Influence of Arm Positioning on Radiation Dose for Whole Body Computed Tomography in Trauma Patients
    Bayer, Joerg
    Pache, Gregor
    Strohm, Peter C.
    Zwingmann, Joern
    Blanke, Philipp
    Baumann, Tobias
    Suedkamp, Norbert P.
    Hammer, Thorsten
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2011, 70 (04): : 900 - 905
  • [3] Bushberg JT, 2021, The essential physics of medical imaging, V4
  • [4] Investigating centering, scan length, and arm position impact on radiation dose across 4 countries from 4 continents during pandemic: Mitigating key radioprotection issues
    Ebrahimian, Shadi
    Bernardo, Monica Oliveira
    Moscatelli, Antonio Alberto
    Tapajos, Juliana
    Tapajos, Luciano Leitao
    Khoury, Helen Jamil
    Babaei, Rosa
    Mobin, Hadi Karimi
    Mohseni, Iman
    Arru, Chiara
    Carriero, Alessandro
    Falaschi, Zeno
    Pasche, Alessio
    Saba, Luca
    Homayounieh, Fatemeh
    Bizzo, Bernardo C.
    Vassileva, Jenia
    Kalra, Mannudeep K.
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 84 : 125 - 131
  • [5] eDok, Region Midtjylland
  • [6] eSundhed, 2022, Internet. Kobenhavn: sundhedsdatastyrelsen. Radiologiske undersogelser
  • [7] International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), 2007, Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT), V102, DOI [10.1177/ANIB_37_1, DOI 10.1177/ANIB_37_1]
  • [8] How does arm positioning of polytraumatized patients in the initial computed tomography (CT) affect image quality and diagnostic accuracy?
    Kahn, Johannes
    Grupp, Ulrich
    Maurer, Martin
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 83 (01) : E67 - E71
  • [9] Whole-body CT in polytrauma patients: Effect of arm positioning on thoracic and abdominal image quality
    Karlo C.
    Gnannt R.
    Frauenfelder T.
    Leschka S.
    Brüesch M.
    Wanner G.A.
    Alkadhi H.
    [J]. Emergency Radiology, 2011, 18 (4) : 285 - 293
  • [10] Radiation exposure in whole-body computed tomography of multiple trauma patients: Bearing devices and patient positioning
    Loewenhardt, Bjoern
    Buhl, Michael
    Gries, Andre
    Greim, Clemens-Alexander
    Hellinger, Achim
    Hessmann, Martin
    Rathjen, Thomas
    Reinert, Michael
    Manke, Christoph
    Bernhard, Michael
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2012, 43 (01): : 67 - 72