Improvement in Adherance to Anesthesia Preoperative Appointment With Telemedicine: A Retrospective Analysis

被引:2
作者
Le, Danny Q. [1 ]
Burton, Brittany N. [1 ]
Tejeda, Christian J. [2 ]
Jalilian, Laleh [2 ]
Kamdar, Nirav [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Perioperat Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Huntington Hosp, Qual Improvement & Clin Operat, Pasadena, NY USA
关键词
appointment adherence; anesthesia care; covid-19; preoperative medicine; telemedicine (tm); RECOMMENDATIONS;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.60805
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Amidst the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the sudden demand for virtual medical visits drove the expansion of telemedicine across all medical specialties. Current literature demonstrates limited knowledge of the impact of telehealth on appointment adherence, particularly in preoperative anesthesia evaluations. This study aims to describe the impact of telemedicine-based anesthesia evaluation and its effects on appointment completion. Methods: This was a retrospective, non -randomized, cohort study of adult patients at the University of California, Los Angeles, United States, who received preoperative anesthesia evaluations by telemedicine or in -person in an academic medical center. From January to September 2021, we evaluated telemedicine and in -person appointment completion in patients scheduled for surgery. The primary outcome was the incidence of appointment completion. The secondary outcomes included appointment no-shows and cancellations. Results: Of 1332 patients included in this study, 956 patients received telehealth visits while 376 patients received in -person preoperative anesthesia evaluations. Compared to the in -person group, the telemedicine group had more appointment completions (81.38% vs 76.60%), fewer cancellations (12.55% vs 19.41%), and no statistical difference in appointment no-shows (6.07% vs 3.99%). Compared to the in -person group, patients who received telemedicine evaluations were younger (55.81 +/- 18.38 vs 65.97 +/- 15.19), less likely Native American and Alaska Native (0.31% vs 1.60%), more likely of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity (16.63% vs 12.23%), required less interpreter services (4.18% vs 9.31%), had more private insurance coverage (53.45% vs 37.50%) and less Medicare coverage (37.03% vs 50.53%). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that telemedicine can improve preoperative anesthesia appointment completion and decrease appointment cancellations. We also demonstrate potential shortcomings of telemedicine in serving patients who are older, require interpreter services, or are non -privately insured. These inequities highlight potential avenues to increase equity and access to telemedicine.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   A Retrospective Analysis of Patients Undergoing Telemedicine Evaluation in the PreAnesthesia Testing Clinic at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center [J].
Aldawoodi, Nasrin N. ;
Muncey, Aaron R. ;
Serdiuk, Andrew A. ;
Miller, Melissa D. ;
Hanna, Mark M. ;
Laborde, Jose M. ;
Garcia Getting, Rosemarie E. .
CANCER CONTROL, 2021, 28
[2]   Telemedicine Pre-anesthesia Evaluation: A Randomized Pilot Trial [J].
Applegate, Richard L., II ;
Gildea, Brett ;
Patchin, Rebecca ;
Rook, James L. ;
Wolford, Brent ;
Nyirady, Janice ;
Dawes, Terry-Ann ;
Faltys, John ;
Ramsingh, Davinder S. ;
Stier, Gary .
TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2013, 19 (03) :211-216
[3]   The Difference in Practice Expense Costs Between Telehealth and In-Office Care Could Serve as the Basis for Differential Reimbursement Structures [J].
Aremu, Elizabeth O. ;
Heffernan, James L. ;
Kvedar, Joseph C. .
TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2022, 28 (06) :912-916
[4]   Telemedicine for preanesthesia evaluation: review of current literature and recommendations for future implementation [J].
Azizad, Omaira ;
Joshi, Girish P. .
CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 34 (06) :672-677
[5]   To Infinity and Beyond: The Past, Present, and Future of Tele-Anesthesia [J].
Bridges, Kathryn Harter ;
McSwain, Julie Ryan ;
Wilson, Phillip Ryan .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2020, 130 (02) :276-284
[6]   Utility of telemedicine in the COVID-19 era [J].
Colbert, Gates B. ;
Verner Venegas-Vera, A. ;
Lerma, Edgar, V .
REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (04) :583-587
[7]   The Lack of a Physical Exam During New Patient Telehealth Visits Does Not Impact Plans for Office and Operating Room Procedures br [J].
Eyrich, Nicholas W. ;
Andino, Juan J. ;
Ukavwe, Roberta E. ;
Farha, Mark W. ;
Patel, Akshar K. ;
Triner, Daniel ;
Ellimoottil, Chad .
UROLOGY, 2022, 167 :109-114
[8]   The Impact of Telehealth Implementation on Underserved Populations and No-Show Rates by Medical Specialty During the COVID-19 Pandemic [J].
Franciosi, Ellen B. ;
Tan, Alice J. ;
Kassamali, Bina ;
Leonard, Nicholas ;
Zhou, Guohai ;
Krueger, Steven ;
Rashighi, Mehdi ;
LaChance, Avery .
TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2021, 27 (08) :874-880
[9]   Telemedicine for the pediatric preoperative assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evaluating patient and provider satisfaction [J].
Geng-Ramos, Giuliana ;
Taneja, Richa ;
Challa, Chaitanya ;
Colon, Caroll Vazquez- ;
Cronin, Jessica ;
Campos, Ana ;
Selekman, Rachel ;
Rana, Md Sohel ;
Melwani, Anjna .
PERIOPERATIVE CARE AND OPERATING ROOM MANAGEMENT, 2022, 27
[10]   Preoperative anxiety after face-to-face patient assessment versus preanaesthesia telemedicine (PANTEM) in adults: a randomised clinical trial [J].
Gibas, Georg ;
Liebisch, Martin ;
Eichenberg, Christiane ;
Krenn, Vincent T. ;
Sallakhi, Aria ;
Benhebesse, Salah E. ;
Kietaibl, Sibylle .
WIENER MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2024, 174 (7-8) :133-139