Can Artificial Intelligence Accurately Detect Urinary Stones? A Systematic Review

被引:5
作者
Panthier, Frederic [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Melchionna, Alberto [1 ]
Crawford-Smith, Hugh [1 ]
Phillipou, Yiannis [1 ]
Choong, Simon [1 ]
Arumuham, Vimoshan [1 ]
Allen, Sian [1 ]
Allen, Clare [5 ]
Smith, Daron [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] UCLH NHS Fdn Trust, Westmoreland St Hosp, Dept Urol, London W1G 8PH, England
[2] Sorbonne Univ GRC Urolithiasis 20 Tenon Hosp, Paris, France
[3] Progress Endourol Assoc Res & Leading Solut PEARL, Paris, France
[4] Arts & Metiers ParisTech, PIMM, CNRS, UMR 8006, Paris, France
[5] Univ Coll London Hosp, Dept Radiol, London, England
[6] Endourol Acad, London, England
[7] Endourol Soc, Social Media Comm, London, England
关键词
artificial intelligence; machine learning; convolutional neural network; urinary stones; volume; detection; LOW-DOSE CT; LEARNING SEGMENTATION; KIDNEY-STONES; UROLITHIASIS;
D O I
10.1089/end.2023.0717
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To perform a systematic review on artificial intelligence (AI) performances to detect urinary stones. Methods: A PROSPERO-registered (CRD473152) systematic search of Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and PubMed databases was performed to identify original research articles pertaining to AI stone detection or measurement, using search terms ("automatic" OR "machine learning" OR "convolutional neural network" OR "artificial intelligence" OR "detection" AND "stone volume"). Risk-of-bias (RoB) assessment was performed according to the Cochrane RoB tool, the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for nonrandomized studies, and the Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM). Results: Twelve studies were selected for the final review, including three multicenter and nine single-center retrospective studies. Eleven studies completed at least 50% of the CLAIM checkpoints and only one presented a high RoB. All included studies aimed to detect kidney (5/12, 42%), ureter (2/12, 16%), or urinary (5/12, 42%) stones on noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT), but 42% intended to automate measurement. Stone distinction from vascular calcification interested two studies. All studies used AI machine learning network training and internal validation, but a single one provided an external validation. Trained networks achieved stone detection, with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates ranging from 58.7% to 100%, 68.5% to 100%, and 63% to 99.95%, respectively. Detection Dice score ranged from 83% to 97%. A high correlation between manual and automated stone volume (r=0.95) was noted. Differentiate distal ureteral stones and phleboliths seemed feasible. Conclusions: AI processes can achieve automated urinary stone detection from NCCT. Further studies should provide urinary stone detection coupled with phlebolith distinction and an external validation, and include anatomical abnormalities and urologic foreign bodies (ureteral stent and nephrostomy tubes) cases.
引用
收藏
页码:725 / 740
页数:16
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Horos Project-Free DICOM Medical Image Viewer
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ResNet graph
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Keras U-Net Starter-LB 0.277
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, The Basics of Classifier Evaluation: Part 1
[5]  
[Anonymous], Understanding Dice Coefficient
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Recommendations | Renal and Ureteric Stones: Assessment and Management | Guidance | NICE
[7]   Automated Machine Learning Segmentation and Measurement of Urinary Stones on CT Scan [J].
Babajide, Rilwan ;
Lembrikova, Katerina ;
Ziemba, Justin ;
Ding, James ;
Li, Yuemeng ;
Fermin, Antoine Selman ;
Fan, Yong ;
Tasian, Gregory E. .
UROLOGY, 2022, 169 :41-46
[8]   Climate-related increase in the prevalence of urolithiasis in the United States [J].
Brikowski, Tom H. ;
Lotan, Yair ;
Pearle, Margaret S. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (28) :9841-9846
[9]   An overview of kidney stone imaging techniques [J].
Brisbane, Wayne ;
Bailey, Michael R. ;
Sorensen, Mathew D. .
NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2016, 13 (11) :654-662
[10]   Claims of priority - The scientific path to the discovery of X-rays [J].
Busch, Uwe .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK, 2023, 33 (02) :230-242