A Comparative Study of Dynamic Hip Screws and Proximal Femoral Nails in Intertrochanteric Fractures

被引:0
|
作者
Thusoo, Varun [1 ]
Nehru, Ashish [2 ]
Kudyar, Sachin [3 ]
Chakrapani, Arjun S. [4 ]
Saini, Eshaan Singh [5 ]
Alok, K., V [6 ]
Narender, D. [7 ]
Philip, Suraj [8 ]
机构
[1] Adesh Med Coll & Hosp, Orthopaed Surg, Ambala, India
[2] Govt Med Coll & Rajindra Hosp, Orthopaed & Trauma, Patiala, India
[3] Govt Med Hosp, Orthopaed, Jammu, India
[4] Apollo Special Hosp, Orthopaed, Chennai, India
[5] Adesh Med Coll & Hosp, Orthopaed, Ambala, India
[6] Osmania Med Coll & Hosp, Orthopaed & Trauma, Hyderabad, India
[7] Govt Med Coll, Orthopaed & Trauma, Kothagudem, India
[8] Pushpagiri Inst Med Sci, Orthopaed, Hyderabad, India
关键词
weight bearing; intertrochanteric hip fractures; hip fracture; dynamic hip screws; proximal femoral nails; PERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES; INTRAMEDULLARY; FIXATION; PLATE;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.59063
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Intertrochanteric fractures, which occur in the hip of older individuals due to the weak and brittle structure of the bone caused by osteoporosis, make up over 50% of all hip fractures. There are several treatment options available for these fractures. The major objective of this study was to carry out a comparative analysis to evaluate the efficacy of dynamic hip screws (DHS) and proximal femoral nails (PFN) in treating intertrochanteric fractures. Methodology Two hundred instances of intertrochanteric hip fractures were surgically treated between July 2022 and January 2024 at a tertiary care facility. The evaluation of fractures was conducted in two groups, namely, group 1, which consisted of 140 patients, each having a fracture in one hip, treated using the DHS method. Group 2 consisted of 60 patients, each having a fracture in one hip, treated using the PFN technique. The evaluation of functional results was performed with the Harris hip score. Results In the investigation within these groups, group 1 produced excellent outcomes in 53 patients, which accounts for 37.86% of the total. In group 2, the expected results were achieved in 34 patients (56.67%). Achieved outcomes were favorable in 75 (53.57%) individuals in group 1 and 21 (35%) in group 2. Out of the individuals in group 1, eight (5.71%) saw benefits, whereas four (1.6%) did not gain significantly. In group 2, five (8.33%) individuals benefitted. None of the patients in group 2 had unfavorable outcomes. Conclusion While both PFN and DHS provide comparable outcomes in stable bone, PFN demonstrated superior results in cases of unstable bone. The use of PFN results in reduced surgical duration and a smaller surgical opening. Additionally, PFN exhibited superior specificity compared to DHS, especially in cases with stable intertrochanteric bone.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dynamic Hip Screw Osteosynthesis for Proximal Femoral Fractures in Patients with Coxarthrosis
    Hrubina, M.
    Skotak, M.
    Letocha, J.
    ACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA, 2015, 82 (05) : 364 - 368
  • [32] Short versus long proximal femoral nail in the management of intertrochanteric fractures- a comparative study
    Rahman, Mohamed Arshad K.
    Siddiqui, Yasir S.
    Julfiqar, Mohammad
    Khan, Abdul Q.
    Sabir, Aamir B.
    Abbas, Mazhar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BURNS AND TRAUMA, 2023, 13 (03): : 99 - 109
  • [33] Cemented hemiarthroplasty versus proximal femoral nail antirotation in the management of intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly: a case control study
    Jin, Zhuangzhuang
    Xu, Shuoyan
    Yang, Yue
    Wei, Yingliang
    Tian, Yicheng
    Wang, Ziyuan
    Bai, Lunhao
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [34] Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation vs dynamic hip screws decrease the incidence of surgical site infections in patients with intertrochanteric fractures: A meta-analysis
    Dai, Peijun
    Zhou, Huipeng
    Mao, Xiaoyu
    Liu, Chang
    Wang, Zhiwei
    Kang, Yifan
    INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2023, 20 (08) : 3212 - 3220
  • [35] Effect of Osteoporosis on Clinical Outcomes in Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures Treated with a Proximal Femoral Nail
    Akan, K.
    Cift, H.
    Ozkan, K.
    Eceviz, E.
    Tasyikan, L.
    Eren, A.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 39 (03) : 857 - 865
  • [36] Comparative evaluation of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus dynamic hip screw for stable intertrochanteric femoral fractures: A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes
    Mustamsir, Edi
    Aji, Aulia P.
    Fernando, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 8 (04) : 35 - 48
  • [37] Dynamic Hip Screw in Comparison with Proximal Femoral Nail Technique in Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture Patients
    Khan, Mudir
    Siraj, Muhammad
    Ali, Abbas
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2021, 15 (11): : 2966 - 2968
  • [38] Comparison of femoral neck system to multiple cancellous screws and dynamic hip screws in the treatment of femoral neck fractures
    Xu, Xiangyu
    Fan, Jixing
    Zhou, Fang
    Lv, Yang
    Tian, Yun
    Ji, Hongquan
    Zhang, Zhishan
    Guo, Yan
    Yang, Zhongwei
    Hou, Guojin
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2023, 54 : S28 - S35
  • [39] Proximal Femoral Lateral Locking Plate versus Short Cephalomedullary Nails for Treating AO/OTA 31 A3 Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures: a Retrospective Clinical Study
    Soylemez, M. S.
    Fidan, F.
    Polat, A.
    Kazdal, C.
    Kurtan, A.
    ACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA, 2021, 88 (03) : 196 - 203
  • [40] Comparison of clinical outcomes with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus dynamic hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures: A meta-analysis
    Zhang, Cong
    Chen, Zhangxin
    Wang, Mengyuan
    Chen, Wei
    Ding, Zhenqi
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (06) : E32920