A Comparative Study of Dynamic Hip Screws and Proximal Femoral Nails in Intertrochanteric Fractures

被引:0
|
作者
Thusoo, Varun [1 ]
Nehru, Ashish [2 ]
Kudyar, Sachin [3 ]
Chakrapani, Arjun S. [4 ]
Saini, Eshaan Singh [5 ]
Alok, K., V [6 ]
Narender, D. [7 ]
Philip, Suraj [8 ]
机构
[1] Adesh Med Coll & Hosp, Orthopaed Surg, Ambala, India
[2] Govt Med Coll & Rajindra Hosp, Orthopaed & Trauma, Patiala, India
[3] Govt Med Hosp, Orthopaed, Jammu, India
[4] Apollo Special Hosp, Orthopaed, Chennai, India
[5] Adesh Med Coll & Hosp, Orthopaed, Ambala, India
[6] Osmania Med Coll & Hosp, Orthopaed & Trauma, Hyderabad, India
[7] Govt Med Coll, Orthopaed & Trauma, Kothagudem, India
[8] Pushpagiri Inst Med Sci, Orthopaed, Hyderabad, India
关键词
weight bearing; intertrochanteric hip fractures; hip fracture; dynamic hip screws; proximal femoral nails; PERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES; INTRAMEDULLARY; FIXATION; PLATE;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.59063
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Intertrochanteric fractures, which occur in the hip of older individuals due to the weak and brittle structure of the bone caused by osteoporosis, make up over 50% of all hip fractures. There are several treatment options available for these fractures. The major objective of this study was to carry out a comparative analysis to evaluate the efficacy of dynamic hip screws (DHS) and proximal femoral nails (PFN) in treating intertrochanteric fractures. Methodology Two hundred instances of intertrochanteric hip fractures were surgically treated between July 2022 and January 2024 at a tertiary care facility. The evaluation of fractures was conducted in two groups, namely, group 1, which consisted of 140 patients, each having a fracture in one hip, treated using the DHS method. Group 2 consisted of 60 patients, each having a fracture in one hip, treated using the PFN technique. The evaluation of functional results was performed with the Harris hip score. Results In the investigation within these groups, group 1 produced excellent outcomes in 53 patients, which accounts for 37.86% of the total. In group 2, the expected results were achieved in 34 patients (56.67%). Achieved outcomes were favorable in 75 (53.57%) individuals in group 1 and 21 (35%) in group 2. Out of the individuals in group 1, eight (5.71%) saw benefits, whereas four (1.6%) did not gain significantly. In group 2, five (8.33%) individuals benefitted. None of the patients in group 2 had unfavorable outcomes. Conclusion While both PFN and DHS provide comparable outcomes in stable bone, PFN demonstrated superior results in cases of unstable bone. The use of PFN results in reduced surgical duration and a smaller surgical opening. Additionally, PFN exhibited superior specificity compared to DHS, especially in cases with stable intertrochanteric bone.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dynamic hip screws versus proximal femoral nails for intertrochanteric fractures
    Avakian, Zorik
    Shiraev, Timothy
    Lam, Lawrence
    Hope, Nigel
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 82 (1-2) : 56 - 59
  • [2] A Comparative Study of Screw and Helical Proximal Femoral Nails for the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures
    Park, Jung Ho
    Lee, Yong Seuk
    Park, Jong Woong
    Wang, Joon Ho
    Kim, Jae Gyoon
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2010, 33 (02) : 81 - 85
  • [3] Comparison of Dynamic Hip Screw and Proximal Femoral Nailing Techniques in Stable Intertrochanteric Fractures
    Shiraz, Salman
    Shujauddin, Mohammad
    Hasan, Khalid
    Elramadi, Ahmed
    Ahmed, Ghalib
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [4] A comparison of proximal femoral locking compression plates with dynamic hip screws in extracapsular femoral fractures
    Zhong, B.
    Zhang, Y.
    Zhang, C.
    Luo, C. -F.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2014, 100 (06) : 663 - 668
  • [5] Clinical Outcomes of the Proximal Femoral Nails in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures
    Cetin, Engin
    Kilic, Mehmet
    Kilic, Feyzi
    Aybar, Ahmet
    Ozkazanli, Gokhan
    GAZI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 30 (01): : 39 - 42
  • [6] A comparative biomechanical study of proximal femoral nail (InterTAN) and proximal femoral nail antirotation for intertrochanteric fractures
    Huang, Yanfeng
    Zhang, Chunlin
    Luo, Yi
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 37 (12) : 2465 - 2473
  • [7] Gamma Nails Revisited: Gamma Nails Versus Compression Hip Screws in the Management of Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Hip: A Meta-Analysis
    Bhandari, Mohit
    Schemitsch, Emil
    Joensson, Anders
    Zlowodzki, Michael
    Haidukewych, George J.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2009, 23 (06) : 460 - 464
  • [8] Comparing Intramedullary Nails Versus Dynamic Hip Screws in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures on Post-operative Rehabilitation Outcomes:A Systematic Review Protocol
    Papp, Steve
    Backman, Chantal
    Konikoff, Lauren
    Tanuseputro, Peter
    Harley, Anne
    Shah, Soha
    Berdusco, Randa
    Domecq, Marie-Cecile
    Poitras, Stephane
    French-Merkley, Veronique
    Beaule, Paul E.
    GERIATRIC ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY & REHABILITATION, 2022, 13
  • [9] Increased Use of Intramedullary Nails for Intertrochanteric Proximal Femoral Fractures in Veterans Affairs Hospitals A Comparative Effectiveness Study
    Radcliff, Tiffany A.
    Regan, Elizabeth
    Ripley, Diane C. Cowper
    Hutt, Evelyn
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2012, 94A (09) : 833 - 840
  • [10] Expandable proximal femoral nails versus 95° dynamic condylar screw-plates for the treatment of reverse oblique intertrochanteric fractures
    Elis, Jacov
    Chechik, Ofir
    Maman, Eran
    Steinberg, Ely L.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2012, 43 (08): : 1313 - 1317