Overcoming the central planner approach - Bilevel optimization of the European energy transition

被引:1
作者
Shu, David Yang [1 ]
Reinert, Christiane [2 ]
Mannhardt, Jacob [2 ]
Leenders, Ludger [1 ]
Luethje, Jannik [4 ]
Mitsos, Alexander [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Bardow, Andre [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Mech & Proc Engn, Energy & Proc Syst Engn, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Tech Thermodynam, D-52062 Aachen, Germany
[3] JARA CSD, D-52056 Aachen, Germany
[4] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Proc Syst Engn AVT SVT, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
[5] Forschungszentrum Julich, Inst Energy & Climate Res, Energy Syst Engn IEK-10, D-52425 Julich, Germany
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
SYSTEMS; MODEL; EXPANSION; PROGRAMS; MARKETS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.isci.2024.110168
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The energy transition is a multinational challenge to mitigate climate change, with a joint reduction target for greenhouse gas emissions. Simultaneously, each country is interested in minimizing its own energy supply cost. Still, most energy system models neglect national interests when identifying cost -optimal transition pathways. We design the European energy system transition until 2050, considering competition between countries in a shared electricity and carbon market using bilevel optimization. We find that national objectives substantially impact the transition pathway: Compared to the model solved using the common centralized optimization, the overall installed capacity increases by just 3% when including national interests. However, the distribution of the installed capacity changes dramatically by more than 40% in most countries. Our results underline the risk of miscalculating the need for national capacity expansion when neglecting stakeholder representation in energy system models and demonstrate the need for cooperation for an efficient energy transition.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [31] Global solution of nonlinear mixed-integer bilevel programs
    Mitsos, Alexander
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION, 2010, 47 (04) : 557 - 582
  • [32] NASH J, 1951, ANN MATH, V54, P286, DOI 10.2307/1969529
  • [33] Overbye T. J., 2004, Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
  • [34] Panos E., 2017, Oligopolistic Capacity Expansion with SubseQuent Market Bidding under Transmission Constraints (OCESM) (ARAMIS)
  • [35] Strategic bidding under uncertainty: A binary expansion approach
    Pereira, MV
    Granville, S
    Fampa, MHC
    Dix, R
    Barroso, LA
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2005, 20 (01) : 180 - 188
  • [36] Energy systems modeling for twenty-first century energy challenges
    Pfenninger, Stefan
    Hawkes, Adam
    Keirstead, James
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 33 : 74 - 86
  • [37] Basic theoretical foundations and insights on bilevel models and their applications to power systems
    Pozo, David
    Sauma, Enzo
    Contreras, Javier
    [J]. ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2017, 254 (1-2) : 303 - 334
  • [38] Classification and challenges of bottom -up energy system models-A review
    Prina, Matteo Giacomo
    Manzolini, Giampaolo
    Moser, David
    Nastasi, Benedetto
    Sparber, Wolfram
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2020, 129
  • [39] SecMOD: An Open-Source Modular Framework Combining Multi-Sector System Optimization and Life-Cycle Assessment
    Reinert, Christiane
    Schellhas, Lars
    Mannhardt, Jacob
    Shu, David Yang
    Kaemper, Andreas
    Baumgaertner, Nils
    Deutz, Sarah
    Bardow, Andre
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 10
  • [40] Environmental impacts of the future German energy system from integrated energy systems optimization and dynamic life cycle assessment
    Reinert, Christiane
    Deutz, Sarah
    Minten, Hannah
    Doerpinghaus, Lukas
    von Pfingsten, Sarah
    Baumgaertner, Nils
    Bardow, Andre
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 153