Detecting Coseismic Landslides in GEE Using Machine Learning Algorithms on Combined Optical and Radar Imagery

被引:5
作者
Peters, Stefan [1 ]
Liu, Jixue [1 ]
Keppel, Gunnar [1 ]
Wendleder, Anna [2 ]
Xu, Peiliang [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia, Unit Sci Technol Engn & Math STEM, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
[2] German Aerosp Ctr DLR, German Remote Sensing Data Ctr, D-82234 Wessling, Germany
[3] Kyoto Univ, Disaster Prevent Res Inst DPRI, Kyoto 6110011, Japan
关键词
landslide detection; satellite remote sensing; machine learning; classification; Google Earth Engine; transfer learning; 2018; HOKKAIDO; EARTHQUAKE;
D O I
10.3390/rs16101722
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Landslides, resulting from disturbances in slope equilibrium, pose a significant threat to landscapes, infrastructure, and human life. Triggered by factors such as intense precipitation, seismic activities, or volcanic eruptions, these events can cause extensive damage and endanger nearby communities. A comprehensive understanding of landslide characteristics, including spatio-temporal patterns, dimensions, and morphology, is vital for effective landslide disaster management. Existing remote sensing approaches mostly use either optical or synthetic aperture radar sensors. Integrating information from both these types of sensors promises greater accuracy for identifying and locating landslides. This study proposes a novel approach, the ML-LaDeCORsat (Machine Learning-based coseismic Landslide Detection using Combined Optical and Radar Satellite Imagery), that integrates freely available Sentinel-1, Palsar-2, and Sentinel-2 imagery data in Google Earth Engine (GEE). The approach also integrates relevant spectral indices and suitable bands used in a machine learning-based classification of coseismic landslides. The approach includes a robust and reproducible training and validation strategy and allows one to choose between five classifiers (CART, Random Forest, GTB, SVM, and Naive Bayes). Using landslides from four different earthquake case studies, we demonstrate the superiority of our approach over existing solutions in coseismic landslide identification and localization, providing a GTB-based detection accuracy of 87-92%. ML-LaDeCORsat can be adapted to other landslide events (GEE script is provided). Transfer learning experiments proved that our model can be applied to other coseismic landslide events without the need for additional training data. Our novel approach therefore facilitates quick and reliable identification of coseismic landslides, highlighting its potential to contribute towards more effective disaster management.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [1] Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine Learning: A Literature Survey
    Ado, Moziihrii
    Amitab, Khwairakpam
    Maji, Arnab Kumar
    Jasinska, Elzbieta
    Gono, Radomir
    Leonowicz, Zbigniew
    Jasinski, Michal
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (13)
  • [2] Earthquake-Induced Landslide Mapping for the 2018 Hokkaido Eastern Iburi Earthquake Using PALSAR-2 Data
    Aimaiti, Yusupujiang
    Liu, Wen
    Yamazaki, Fumio
    Maruyama, Yoshihisa
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (20)
  • [3] Assessing the performance of machine learning algorithms for soil salinity mapping in Google Earth Engine platform using Sentinel-2A and Landsat-8 OLI data
    Aksoy, Samet
    Yildirim, Aylin
    Gorji, Taha
    Hamzehpour, Nikou
    Tanik, Aysegul
    Sertel, Elif
    [J]. ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2022, 69 (02) : 1072 - 1086
  • [4] GIS-based landslide susceptibility modeling: A comparison between fuzzy multi-criteria and machine learning algorithms
    Ali, Sk Ajim
    Parvin, Farhana
    Vojtekova, Jana
    Costache, Romulus
    Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh
    Quoc Bao Pham
    Vojtek, Matej
    Gigovic, Ljubomir
    Ahmad, Ateeque
    Ghorbani, Mohammad Ali
    [J]. GEOSCIENCE FRONTIERS, 2021, 12 (02) : 857 - 876
  • [5] Poleward migration of the destructive effects of tropical cyclones during the 20th century
    Altman, Jan
    Ukhvatkina, Olga N.
    Omelko, Alexander M.
    Macek, Martin
    Plener, Tomas
    Pejcha, Vit
    Cerny, Tomas
    Petrik, Petr
    Srutek, Miroslav
    Song, Jong-Suk
    Zhmerenetsky, Alexander A.
    Vozmishcheva, Anna S.
    Krestov, Pavel, V
    Petrenko, Tatyana Y.
    Treydte, Kerstin
    Dolezal, Jiri
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2018, 115 (45) : 11543 - 11548
  • [6] Ariza A., 2021, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMME, VXLIII-B3-2021, P679, DOI [https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-679-2021, DOI 10.5194/ISPRS-ARCHIVES-XLIII-B3-2021-679-2021, 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-679-2021]
  • [7] A globally consistent local-scale assessment of future tropical cyclone risk
    Bloemendaal, Nadia
    de Moel, Hans
    Martinez, Andrew B.
    Muis, Sanne
    Haigh, Ivan D.
    van der Wiel, Karin
    Haarsma, Reindert J.
    Ward, Philip J.
    Roberts, Malcolm J.
    Dullaart, Job C. M.
    Aerts, Jeroen C. J. H.
    [J]. SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2022, 8 (17):
  • [8] Byrraju S.V., 2019, Landslide Detection Using Remote Sensing Methods a Review of Current Techniques
  • [9] An Advanced Echo Separation Scheme for Space-Time Waveform-Encoding SAR Based on Digital Beamforming and Blind Source Separation
    Chang, Sheng
    Deng, Yunkai
    Zhang, Yanyan
    Wang, Rongxiang
    Qiu, Jinsong
    Wang, Wei
    Zhao, Qingchao
    Liu, Dacheng
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (15)
  • [10] Cruden D.M., 1993, Landslides Eng. Pract, V24, P20