Hurwicz expected utility and subjective sources

被引:31
作者
Gul, Faruk [1 ]
Pesendorfer, Wolfgang [1 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Dept Econ, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Ambiguity; Source preference; Allais paradox; RISK; AMBIGUITY; PROBABILITY; CHOICE; ATTITUDES; AVERSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jet.2015.05.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In experiments, subjects are often not indifferent among all sources of uncertainty; between two prospects yielding the same distribution of monetary rewards, they may strictly prefer one over the other. We formulate a special case of ce-maxmin expected utility theory in a Savage setting, show that every decision maker perceives multiple subjective sources, and that source-utilities are rank dependent expected utility. A power series identifies each source, measures source-uncertainty, and determines the agent's source-specific risk attitude. Subjective sources relate Ellsberg-paradox behavior to source preference and to Allais-paradox behavior. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 488
页数:24
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions [J].
Abdellaoui, M .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 46 (11) :1497-1512
[2]   The Rich Domain of Uncertainty: Source Functions and Their Experimental Implementation [J].
Abdellaoui, Mohammed ;
Baillon, Aurelien ;
Placido, Laetitia ;
Wakker, Peter P. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2011, 101 (02) :695-723
[4]   A DEFINITION OF SUBJECTIVE-PROBABILITY [J].
ANSCOMBE, FJ ;
AUMANN, RJ .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1963, 34 (01) :199-&
[5]  
Billingsley P., 1995, Probability and Measure, Vthird
[6]   VIOLATIONS OF THE BETWEENNESS AXIOM AND NONLINEARITY IN PROBABILITY [J].
CAMERER, CF ;
HO, TH .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1994, 8 (02) :167-196
[7]  
CHEW SH, 1987, J ECON THEORY, V42, P370
[8]   Small worlds: Modeling attitudes toward sources of uncertainty [J].
Chew, Soo Hong ;
Sagi, Jacob S. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2008, 139 (01) :1-24
[9]  
Chipman JohnS., 1960, DECIS VALUES GROUPS, P70, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-08-009237-9.50010-X, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-009237-9.50010-X]
[10]  
Choquet G., 1953, Ann. L'inst. Fourier, V5, P131, DOI [DOI 10.5802/AIF.53, 10.5802/aif.53]