Field surveys of tsunami runup and damage following the January 2024 M w 7.5 Noto (Japan sea) tsunamigenic earthquake

被引:13
作者
Heidarzadeh, Mohammad [1 ]
Ishibe, Takeo [2 ]
Gusman, Aditya Riadi [3 ]
Miyazaki, Hiroko [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bath, Dept Architecture & Civil Engn, Bath BA2 7AY, Somerset, England
[2] Assoc Dev Earthquake Predict, Tokyo 1010064, Japan
[3] GNS Sci, 1 Fairway Dr, Avalon, Lower Hutt 5010, New Zealand
关键词
Earthquake; Tsunami; Sea of Japan; Field survey; Wave runup; Coseismic uplift; Noto; IMPACT; SULAWESI; WAVES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118140
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
The January 1, 2024 Noto Peninsula M w 7.5 tsunamigenic earthquake, with at least 241 deaths, was the most destructive event in Japan following the March 2011 M w 9.0 catastrophic event. We conducted field surveys in the affected area 24 days after the event to document tsunami heights, runups, coseismic coastal uplift and damage to coastal structures. Here, we present the results of the surveys and analyze tsunami height distribution and associated damage. In our survey of 29 locations, tsunami runups and heights varied in the ranges of 4.4 -6.2 m, and 1.0 -4.4 m, respectively. Notably, Joetsu, the farthest location from the epicenter in our field survey, recorded the highest runup of 6.2 m, which is attributed to the directivity effect of tsunami waves. The maximum surveyed runup of 6.2 m closely aligns with the reported maximum fault slip of 4 -6 m for this earthquake, confirming a long-established rule of thumb. Coastal crustal uplifts of up to 1.6 m have rendered many ports unsuitable for use. We identified three failure mechanisms affecting coastal structures: overturning caused by tsunami backwash, damage resulting from tsunami inundation currents and wave pressure, and impacts from floating objects and debris.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Abe K., 1975, Journal of Physics of the Earth, V23, P349, DOI 10.4294/jpe1952.23.349
  • [2] Tsunami wave characteristics in Sendai Bay, Japan, following the 2016 Mw 6.9 Fukushima earthquake
    Cheng, An-Chi
    Suppasri, Anawat
    Heidarzadeh, Mohammad
    Adriano, Bruno
    Chua, Constance Ting
    Imamura, Fumihiko
    [J]. OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2023, 287
  • [3] Design for Tsunami Loads and Effects in the ASCE 7-16 Standard
    Chock, Gary Y. K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 142 (11)
  • [4] Partial differential equations of mathematical physics
    Courant, R
    Friedrichs, K
    Lewy, H
    [J]. MATHEMATISCHE ANNALEN, 1928, 100 : 32 - 74
  • [5] The 30 October 2020 Aegean Sea Tsunami: Post-Event Field Survey Along Turkish Coast
    Dogan, Gozde Guney
    Yalciner, Ahmet Cevdet
    Yuksel, Yalcin
    Ulutas, Ergin
    Polat, Orhan
    Guler, Isikhan
    Sahin, Cihan
    Tarih, Ahmet
    Kanoglu, Utku
    [J]. PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2021, 178 (03) : 785 - 812
  • [6] Slip distribution of the 2024 Noto Peninsula earthquake (MJMA 7.6) estimated from tsunami waveforms and GNSS data
    Fujii, Yushiro
    Satake, Kenji
    [J]. EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE, 2024, 76 (01):
  • [7] The impact of the 26 December 2004 earthquake and tsunami on structures and infrastructure
    Ghobarah, A
    Saatcioglu, M
    Nistor, I
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2006, 28 (02) : 312 - 326
  • [8] Grinsted A., 2024, Tidal Fitting Toolbox
  • [9] The landslide source of the eastern Mediterranean tsunami on 6 February 2023 following the Mw 7.8 Kahramanmaras (Turkiye) inland earthquake
    Heidarzadeh, Mohammad
    Gusman, Aditya Riadi
    Mulia, Iyan E.
    [J]. GEOSCIENCE LETTERS, 2023, 10 (01)
  • [10] Normal and reverse storm surges along the coast of Florida during the September 2022 Hurricane Ian: Observations, analysis, and modelling
    Heidarzadeh, Mohammad
    Iwamoto, Takumu
    Sepic, Jadranka
    Mulia, Iyan E.
    [J]. OCEAN MODELLING, 2023, 185