Fluconazole and levofloxacin prophylaxis are ineffective strategies for preventing infections in acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing chemotherapy

被引:0
|
作者
Soldi, Luiz Ricardo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Silva, Marcelo Jose Barbosa [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Uberlandia, Inst Biomed Sci, Dept Microbiol & Immunol, Uberlandia, MG, Brazil
[2] Tumour Biomarkers & Osteoimmunol Lab, Ave Para 1720 Block 6T,Ave Para 1720,Room 07, Uberlandia, MG, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Uberlandia, Inst Biomed Sci, Uberlandia, MG, Brazil
关键词
Fluconazole; Levofloxacin; Survival; Fungal; Bacteria; ANTIFUNGAL PROPHYLAXIS; RESISTANCE; SURVIVAL; POSACONAZOLE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.canep.2024.102593
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Acute myeloid leukemia patients are at high risk for infections, which contribute to increased mortality rates of up to 70%. The use of antimicrobial prophylaxis has been shown to significantly lower rates of infection. Therefore, this retrospective study aimed to evaluate the effect of two agents that showed effective results in the literature, levofloxacin and fluconazole, as prophylaxis strategies in AML patients. Methodology: A total of 85 AML patients' medical records treated with a 7+3 induction chemotherapy protocol in the Cancer Hospital of Uberlandia from 2017 to 2021 were screened and their data was collected. Within these patients, groups for analysis were created based on whether the acting physician included an antibacterial or antifungal prophylaxis protocol during induction. Contingency tables with chi 2 and odds ratio tests were realized to verify associations between prophylaxis and infection. Additionally, Kaplan-Meier curves with Cox regression were developed to analyze survival. Results: The use of prophylaxis with either fluconazole or levofloxacin did not lower rates of infection, as those who with prophylaxis did not demonstrate significant differences when compared to those without (20.3-29.7%, and 12.3-23.3%, respectively). Patients who suffered a bacterial infection during induction were shown to have lower overall survival, with a similar trend seen in fungal infections. Conclusion: Bacterial and fungal infections were associated with higher rates of induction mortality and lower overall survival, and prophylaxis using fluconazole and levofloxacin did not present any significant difference in preventing these infections in this study, contrasting results found in the literature. The individuality of each treatment center should be taken into consideration and future studies should be realized to better determine the most effective methods and agents for prophylaxis.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fluconazole Prophylaxis and Invasive Fungal Infections in Patients Receiving Induction/Consolidation Chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
    Kodali, S.
    Jehangir, W.
    Umyarova, E.
    Cade, R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2019, 185 : 156 - 156
  • [2] Invasive Fungal Infections in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Intensive Chemotherapy
    Mishra, Pinki
    Agrawal, Narendra
    Bhurani, Dinesh
    Agarwal, Nidhi Bharal
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY AND BLOOD TRANSFUSION, 2020, 36 (01) : 64 - 70
  • [3] Invasive Fungal Infections in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Intensive Chemotherapy
    Pinki Mishra
    Narendra Agrawal
    Dinesh Bhurani
    Nidhi Bharal Agarwal
    Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2020, 36 : 64 - 70
  • [4] Impact of fluconazole versus posaconazole prophylaxis on the incidence of fungal infections in patients receiving induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia
    Devanlay, Camille
    Tavernier-Tardy, Emmanuelle
    Bourmaud, Aurelie
    Falk, Alexander Tuan
    Raberin, Helene
    Menguy, Sandrine
    Guyotat, Denis
    Magne, Nicolas
    Cornillon, Jerome
    BIOMEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 38 (03) : 235 - 243
  • [5] The fate of patients with acute myeloid leukemia not undergoing induction chemotherapy
    Masamitsu Yanada
    Akinao Okamoto
    Yoko Inaguma
    Masutaka Tokuda
    Satoko Morishima
    Tadaharu Kanie
    Yukiya Yamamoto
    Shuichi Mizuta
    Yoshiki Akatsuka
    Masataka Okamoto
    Nobuhiko Emi
    International Journal of Hematology, 2015, 102 : 35 - 40
  • [6] The fate of patients with acute myeloid leukemia not undergoing induction chemotherapy
    Yanada, Masamitsu
    Okamoto, Akinao
    Inaguma, Yoko
    Tokuda, Masutaka
    Morishima, Satoko
    Kanie, Tadaharu
    Yamamoto, Yukiya
    Mizuta, Shuichi
    Akatsuka, Yoshiki
    Okamoto, Masataka
    Emi, Nobuhiko
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 2015, 102 (01) : 35 - 40
  • [7] Strategies for the prophylaxis of invasive fungal diseases in acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax treatment
    Li, Pengfei
    Luo, Zhiming
    Deng, Jianchuan
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2025, 31 (02)
  • [8] Comparison of garenoxacin with levofloxacin as antimicrobial prophylaxis in acute myeloid leukemia
    Uni, Masahiro
    Yoshimi, Akihide
    Yamazaki, Sho
    Taoka, Kazuki
    Shinohara, Akihito
    Nannya, Yasuhito
    Nakamura, Fumihiko
    Kurokawa, Mineo
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 45 (08) : 745 - 748
  • [9] Micafungin prophylaxis for acute leukemia patients undergoing induction chemotherapy
    Hyunkyung Park
    Jeonghwan Youk
    Dong-Yeop Shin
    Junshik Hong
    Inho Kim
    Nam Joong Kim
    Jeong-Ok Lee
    Soo-Mee Bang
    Sung-Soo Yoon
    Wan Beom Park
    Youngil Koh
    BMC Cancer, 19
  • [10] Micafungin prophylaxis for acute leukemia patients undergoing induction chemotherapy
    Park, Hyunkyung
    Youk, Jeonghwan
    Shin, Dong-Yeop
    Hong, Junshik
    Kim, Inho
    Kim, Nam Joong
    Lee, Jeong-Ok
    Bang, Soo-Mee
    Yoon, Sung-Soo
    Park, Wan Beom
    Koh, Youngil
    BMC CANCER, 2019, 19