Comparable prognosis of early gastric cancer between intestinal type and diffuse type in patients of age 75 and older: a SEER-based cohort study

被引:1
作者
Yin, Ping [1 ]
Cai, Rencheng [2 ]
Zhou, Xiaohua [3 ]
Yao, Xuemin [4 ]
Yang, Qiufen [4 ]
Jin, Yuehong [4 ]
Jiao, Xuehua [5 ]
Lu, Chengjie [6 ]
Qiao, Zhenguo [4 ]
机构
[1] Wujiang Fifth Peoples Hosp, Dept Tradit Chinese Med, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Gaochun Peoples Hosp, Dept Geriatr, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Gaochun Peoples Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[4] Soochow Univ, Suzhou Hosp 9, Suzhou Peoples Hosp 9, Dept Gastroenterol, 2666 Ludang Rd, Suzhou 215200, Peoples R China
[5] Soochow Univ, Suzhou Peoples Hosp 9, Dept Endocrinol, Suzhou Hosp 9, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[6] Soochow Univ, Suzhou Peoples Hosp 9, Dept Tradit Chinese Med, Suzhou Hosp 9, 2666 Ludang Rd, Suzhou 215200, Peoples R China
关键词
Early gastric cancer (EGC); Lauren classification; prognosis; Surveillance; Epidemiology; and End Results database (SEER database); SURVIVAL; SURGERY;
D O I
10.21037/tcr-23-1681
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The prognostic significance of Lauren's classification in elderly early gastric cancer (EGC) patients remains largely unknown. We aim to investigate the characteristics and clinical implications of Lauren's classification in elderly EGC patients. Methods: Patients were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression, propensity score matching, inverse-probability-weighted analysis, and propensity-score adjustment were utilized to evaluate the association between Lauren's classification and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in elderly EGC patients. Stratification and interaction analyses were used to reveal the effects of confounding factors on the association between Lauren's classification and CSS. Results: The diffuse type (median, 41.0 months) showed a similar survival (37.0 months), and was mainly distributed in female group (62.5% vs. 42.2%) with poorly differentiated or undifferentiated components (89.1% vs. 27.0%) compared with intestinal type in elderly EGC patients. Analyses of univariate and multivariate Cox regression, propensity score matching, inverse-probability-weighted analysis, and propensity-score adjustment showed that Lauren's classification was not significantly CSS in elderly EGC patients (P>0.05). Subgroup and interaction analyses confirmed the stability of the results. Conclusions: Diffuse type was mainly distributed in female patients with more poorly differentiated/undifferentiated components and similar prognosis compared with intestinal type in age 75 and older EGC patients. No significant association was observed between diffuse type and CSS of the elderly EGC patients.
引用
收藏
页码:888 / 899
页数:12
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of patients at risk of gastric adenocarcinoma [J].
Banks, Matthew ;
Graham, David ;
Jansen, Marnix ;
Gotoda, Takuji ;
Coda, Sergio ;
di Pietro, Massimiliano ;
Uedo, Noriya ;
Bhandari, Pradeep ;
Pritchard, D. Mark ;
Kuipers, Ernst J. ;
Rodriguez-Justo, Manuel ;
Novelli, Marco R. ;
Ragunath, Krish ;
Shepherd, Neil ;
Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario .
GUT, 2019, 68 (09) :1545-1575
[2]   Long-term outcome comparison of endoscopic resection and surgery in early gastric cancer meeting the absolute indication for endoscopic resection [J].
Choi, Il Ju ;
Lee, Jun Ho ;
Kim, Young-Il ;
Kim, Chan Gyoo ;
Cho, Soo-Jeong ;
Lee, Jong Yeul ;
Ryu, Keun Won ;
Nam, Byung-Ho ;
Kook, Myeong-Cherl ;
Kim, Young-Woo .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (02) :333-U395
[3]   Gastric Cancer in Older Patients: A Retrospective Study and Literature Review [J].
Choi, Yonghoon ;
Kim, Nayoung ;
Kim, Ki Wook ;
Jo, Hyeong Ho ;
Park, Jaehyung ;
Yoon, Hyuk ;
Shin, Cheol Min ;
Park, Young Soo ;
Lee, Dong Ho .
ANNALS OF GERIATRIC MEDICINE AND RESEARCH, 2022, 26 (01) :33-41
[4]   Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995-2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data [J].
Coleman, M. P. ;
Forman, D. ;
Bryant, H. ;
Butler, J. ;
Rachet, B. ;
Maringe, C. ;
Nur, U. ;
Tracey, E. ;
Coory, M. ;
Hatcher, J. ;
McGahan, C. E. ;
Turner, D. ;
Marrett, L. ;
Gjerstorff, M. L. ;
Johannesen, T. B. ;
Adolfsson, J. ;
Lambe, M. ;
Lawrence, G. ;
Meechan, D. ;
Morris, E. J. ;
Middleton, R. ;
Steward, J. ;
Richards, M. A. .
LANCET, 2011, 377 (9760) :127-138
[5]   Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection in Western countries: Indications, applications, efficacy and training perspective [J].
De Luca, Luca ;
Di Berardino, Massimiliano ;
Mangiavillano, Benedetto ;
Repici, Alessandro .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2021, 13 (10) :1180-1189
[6]   Effects of age on survival and morbidity in gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy [J].
Fujiwara, Yoshinori ;
Fukuda, Shuichi ;
Tsujie, Masanori ;
Ishikawa, Hajime ;
Kitani, Kotaro ;
Inoue, Keisuke ;
Yukawa, Masao ;
Inoue, Masatoshi .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 9 (06) :257-262
[7]   A Distinct Clinicopathological Feature and Prognosis of Young Gastric Cancer Patients Aged ≤ 45 Years Old [J].
Huang, Qian ;
Zheng, Xiufeng ;
Jiao, Yang ;
Lei, Yanna ;
Li, Xiaoying ;
Bi, Feng ;
Guo, Fukun ;
Wang, Gang ;
Liu, Ming .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
[8]   Challenges in the treatment of gastric cancer in the older patient [J].
Joharatnam-Hogan, Nalinie ;
Shiu, Kai Keen ;
Khan, Khurum .
CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2020, 85
[9]   Current treatment and recent progress in gastric cancer [J].
Joshi, Smita S. ;
Badgwell, Brian D. .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2021, 71 (03) :264-279
[10]   2 HISTOLOGICAL MAIN TYPES OF GASTRIC CARCINOMA - DIFFUSE AND SO-CALLED INTESTINAL-TYPE CARCINOMA - AN ATTEMPT AT A HISTO-CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION [J].
LAUREN, P .
ACTA PATHOLOGICA ET MICROBIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1965, 64 (01) :31-&