Automated, economical, and environmentally-friendly asphalt mix design based on machine learning and multi-objective grey wolf optimization

被引:1
|
作者
Liu, Jian [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Fangyu [3 ]
Wang, Linbing [2 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Sch Environm Civil Agr & Mech Engn, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Illinois Ctr Transportat, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
Asphalt mix design; Machine learning; MOGWO; CO; 2; emission; Volumetric properties; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; MIXTURES; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtte.2023.10.002
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The increasing impact of the greenhouse effect on ecosystems is prompting transportation agencies to seek methods for reducing CO 2 emissions during pavement construction and maintenance. Additionally, the laboratory mix design process, which involves selecting aggregate gradation and binder content, is time-consuming and labor-intensive. To accelerate the traditional mix design procedure, this study presented a mix design procedure that can automatically determine gradation and binder content based on machine learning (ML) and a meta-heuristic algorithm. Specifically, ML approaches were employed to model the relationship between volumetric properties (mixture bulk specific gravity (G mb ) and air void (VV)) and both mixture component properties and mixture proportion, based on a dataset collected from literature with 660 mixture designs. Integrated with the prediction of ML models and the modified multi-objective grey wolf optimization (MOGWO) algorithm, an automatic asphalt mix design was proposed to pursue three goals, including VV, cost, and CO 2 emission. The results indicated that least squares support vector regression (LSSVR) and eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) achieved the highest prediction accuracies (correlation coefficient: 0.92 for VV and 0.96 for G mb ). The MOGWO algorithm successfully found the 26 optimal mix designs for the case of VV vs. cost vs. CO 2 emission. Compared to the traditional laboratory design, the optimal mixture with VV of 4% achieves a cost saving of 2.46% and a reduction of 4.03% in carbon emission. The volumetric properties of the mixtures output by the approach also align closely with values measured in a laboratory. (c) 2024 Periodical Offices of Chang 'an University. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NCND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 405
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Machine Learning Based Multi-Objective Surrogate Optimization of MSMPR Process
    Inapakurthi, Ravi Kiran
    Naik, Sakshi Sushant
    Mitra, Kishalay
    2022 EIGHTH INDIAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, ICC, 2022, : 176 - 181
  • [42] Model selection of extreme learning machine based on multi-objective optimization
    Mao, Wentao
    Tian, Mei
    Cao, Xizheng
    Xu, Jiucheng
    NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2013, 22 (3-4): : 521 - 529
  • [43] Multi-objective optimization of wave break forest design through machine learning
    Ren, Jie
    Dong, Zengchuan
    Xu, Wei
    Zhang, Qilai
    Shi, Rensheng
    Zhu, Hansong
    Sun, Biao
    JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2019, 21 (02) : 295 - 307
  • [44] Multi-objective optimization of urban environmental system design using machine learning
    Li, Peiyuan
    Xu, Tianfang
    Wei, Shiqi
    Wang, Zhi-Hua
    COMPUTERS ENVIRONMENT AND URBAN SYSTEMS, 2022, 94
  • [45] Multi-Objective Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm for Solving Real-World BLDC Motor Design Problem
    Premkumar, M.
    Jangir, Pradeep
    Kumar, B. Santhosh
    Alqudah, Mohammad A.
    Nisar, Kottakkaran Sooppy
    CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA, 2022, 70 (02): : 2435 - 2452
  • [46] Multi-Objective Hyperparameter Optimization in Machine Learning—An Overview
    Karl F.
    Pielok T.
    Moosbauer J.
    Pfisterer F.
    Coors S.
    Binder M.
    Schneider L.
    Thomas J.
    Richter J.
    Lang M.
    Garrido-Merchán E.C.
    Branke J.
    Bischl B.
    ACM. Trans. Evol. Learn. Optim., 2023, 4
  • [47] Machine Learning Assisted Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization
    Zhang, Xingyi
    Cheng, Ran
    Feng, Liang
    Jin, Yaochu
    IEEE COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE MAGAZINE, 2023, 18 (02) : 16 - 17
  • [48] Mine-to-crusher policy: Planning of mine blasting patterns for environmentally friendly and optimum fragmentation using Monte Carlo simulation-based multi-objective grey wolf optimization approach
    Hosseini, Shahab
    Mousavi, Amin
    Monjezi, Masoud
    Khandelwal, Manoj
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2022, 79
  • [49] Multi-objective covering salesman problem: a decomposition approach using grey wolf optimization
    Khan, Indadul
    Basuli, Krishnendu
    Maiti, Manas Kumar
    KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2023, 65 (01) : 281 - 339
  • [50] Multi-objective covering salesman problem: a decomposition approach using grey wolf optimization
    Indadul Khan
    Krishnendu Basuli
    Manas Kumar Maiti
    Knowledge and Information Systems, 2023, 65 : 281 - 339