Comparing short-term outcomes of robot-assisted and conventional laparoscopic total mesorectal excision surgery for rectal cancer in elderly patients

被引:0
作者
Yang, Hao [1 ]
Yang, Gang [1 ]
Wu, Wen-Ya [1 ]
Wang, Fang [1 ]
Yao, Xue-Quan [2 ]
Wu, Xiao-Yu [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Chinese Med, Affiliated Hosp, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Chinese Med, Dept Surg Oncol, Affiliated Hosp, 155 Hanzhong Rd, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY | 2024年 / 16卷 / 05期
关键词
Robotic surgery; Laparoscopy; Rectal cancer; Total mesorectal excision; Elderly; RESECTION; CONVERSION;
D O I
10.4240/wjgs.v16.i5.1271
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND<br /> Da Vinci Robotics-assisted total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery for rectal cancer is becoming more widely used. There is no strong evidence that robotic-assisted surgery and laparoscopic surgery have similar outcomes in elderly patients with TME for rectal cancer. AIM<br /> To determine the improved oncological outcomes and short-term efficacy of robot-assisted surgery in elderly patients undergoing TME surgery. METHODS<br /> A retrospective study of the clinical pathology and follow-up of elderly patients who underwent TME surgery at the Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology at the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine was conducted from March 2020 through September 2023. The patients were divided into a robot-assisted group (the R-TME group) and a laparoscopic group (the L-TME group), and the short-term efficacy of the two groups was compared. RESULTS<br /> There were 45 elderly patients (>= 60 years) in the R-TME group and 50 elderly patients (>= 60 years) in the L-TME group. There were no differences in demographics, conversion rates, or postoperative complication rates. The L-TME group had a longer surgical time than the R-TME group [145 (125, 187.5) vs 180 (148.75, 206.25) min, P = 0.005), and the first postoperative meal time in the L-TME group was longer than that in the R-TME (4 vs 3 d, P = 0.048). Among the sex and body mass index (BMI) subgroups, the R-TME group had better outcomes than did the L-TME group in terms of operation time (P = 0.042) and intraoperative assessment of bleeding (P = 0.042). In the high BMI group, catheter removal occurred earlier in the R-TME group than in the L-TME group (3 vs 4 d, P = 0.001), and autonomous voiding function was restored. CONCLUSION<br /> The curative effect and short-term efficacy of robot-assisted TME surgery for elderly patients with rectal cancer are similar to those of laparoscopic TME surgery; however, robotic-assisted surgery has better short-term outcomes for individuals with risk factors such as obesity and pelvic stenosis. Optimizing the learning curve can shorten the operation time, reduce the recovery time of gastrointestinal function, and improve the prognosis.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: Current immediate clinical and oncological outcomes
    Alonso Araujo, Sergio Eduardo
    Seid, Victor Edmond
    Klajner, Sidney
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (39) : 14359 - 14370
  • [2] Impact of conversion on the long-term outcome in laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer
    Chan, Albert C. Y.
    Poon, Jensen T. C.
    Fan, Joe K. M.
    Lo, Siu Hung
    Law, Wai Lun
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (12): : 2625 - 2630
  • [3] Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer
    Chand, Manish
    Bhoday, Jemma
    Brown, Gina
    Moran, Brendan
    Parvaiz, Amjad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2012, 105 (10) : 429 - 435
  • [4] Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer Provides Advantageous Outcomes Over Laparoscopic Approach Results From a Large Retrospective Cohort
    Crippa, Jacopo
    Grass, Fabian
    Dozois, Eric J.
    Mathis, Kellie L.
    Merchea, Amit
    Colibaseanu, Dorin T.
    Kelley, Scott R.
    Larson, David W.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2021, 274 (06) : E1218 - E1222
  • [5] Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial
    Feng, Qingyang
    Yuan, Weitang
    Li, Taiyuan
    Tang, Bo
    Jia, Baoqing
    Zhou, Yanbing
    Zhang, Wei
    Zhao, Ren
    Zhang, Cheng
    Cheng, Longwei
    Zhang, Xiaoqiao
    Liang, Fei
    He, Guodong
    Wei, Ye
    Xu, Jianmin
    [J]. LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 7 (11): : 991 - 1004
  • [6] Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery
    Feroci, Francesco
    Vannucchi, Andrea
    Bianchi, Paolo Pietro
    Cantafio, Stefano
    Garzi, Alessia
    Formisano, Giampaolo
    Scatizzi, Marco
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 22 (13) : 3602 - 3610
  • [7] Urogenital function following robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: meta-analysis
    Fleming, C. A.
    Cullinane, C.
    Lynch, N.
    Killeen, S.
    Coffey, J. C.
    Peirce, C. B.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108 (02) : 128 - 136
  • [8] Update on Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
    Giuratrabocchetta, Simona
    Formisano, Giampaolo
    Salaj, Adelona
    Opocher, Enrico
    Ferraro, Luca
    Toti, Francesco
    Bianchi, Paolo Pietro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2021, 11 (09):
  • [9] Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a case-control study
    Grosek, Jan
    Kosir, Jurij Ales
    Sever, Primoz
    Erculj, Vanja
    Tomazic, Ales
    [J]. RADIOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 55 (04) : 433 - 438
  • [10] HEALD RJ, 1986, LANCET, V1, P1479