Application of Article 39 of the Civil Code in case of disposal (alienation) of real estate by Church Legal Entities

被引:1
作者
Grzesiowski, Krzysztof [1 ]
机构
[1] Uniwersytet Szczecinski, Szczecin, Poland
来源
STUDIA PRAWNICZE KUL | 2024年 / 02期
关键词
canon law; civil law; suspended ineffectiveness of a contract; alienation of real estate; church legal entities;
D O I
10.31743/sp.16831
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The article analyses the issue of violations of the rules of representation of Church Legal Entities under canon law and their effect on the disposal (alienation) of real estate. The aim of the considerations carried out was to determine the scope of application of the amended Article 39 of the Civil Code to Church Legal Entities. The issue of the disposal of real estate by Church Legal Entities in violation of the rules of representation under the Code of Canon Law has already been the subject of Supreme Court case law and discussion in the doctrine, but most of the contributions were formulated before the amendment of Article 39 of the Civil Code, the amended content of which entered into force on 1 March 2019. Therefore, it was again necessary to consider the consequences of Church Legal Entities acting beyond their authority under the internal law of the Catholic Church. The considerations in the article were conducted using the dogmatic and legal method. The analysis carried out showed that the amended Article 39 of the Civil Code is applicable to Church Legal Entities. Contracts concerning the disposal (alienation) of real estate concluded by Church Legal Entities in the event of a breach of the scope of authority and the manner of representation resulting from canon law will be sanctioned by relative ineffectiveness on the basis of Article 39 of the Civil Code.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 98
页数:18
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Ciesla W., 2021, Wybrane zagadnienia dotyczace zasad reprezentacji parafii Kociola katolickiego przy zbyciu nieruchomoci, Nieruchomoci@
[2]  
Glowacka A., 2014, Folia Iuridica Wratislaviensis, V3
[3]  
Gurgul S., 2022, Monitor Prawniczy
[4]  
Herbet A., 2022, w: Zobowiazania, t. 1. Przepisy ogolne i powiazane przepisy Ksiegi I K.c. Komen- tarz, V1
[5]  
Jablonski W., 2011, Glosa do uchwaly SN z dnia 19 grudnia 2008 r., III CZP 122/08, Przeglad Prawa Wyznaniowego 2011, t., V3
[6]  
Januchowski A., 2010, Glosa do uchwaly SN z dnia 19 grudnia 2008 r., III CZP 122/08, Orzeczni- ctwo Sadow Polskich 2010, P18
[7]  
Kalinski M., 2013, Przeglad Sadowy
[8]  
Kotuk T., 2012, Glosa do uchwaly SN z dnia 19 grudnia 2008 r., III CZP 122/08
[9]  
Kuzmicka-Sulikowska J., 2010, Glosa do uchwaly SN z dnia 19 grudnia 2008 r., III CZP 122/08, Orzecznictwo Sadow Polskich 2010, z. 2, poz. 18
[10]  
Mroz A., 2021, Prawo Kanoniczne, V64