Instruments to assess diabetes knowledge, skills and attitudes of people living with diabetes mellitus: A COSMIN-based systematic review

被引:0
作者
Lemos, Carla Assad [1 ,4 ]
Oliveira, Thalita Zago [1 ]
Cunha, Joao Paulo Alves [1 ]
Costa, Daiane Vieira Medeiros [2 ]
Zanetti, Maria Olivia Barboza [3 ]
Dantas, Rosana Aparecida Spadoti [2 ]
Varallo, Fabiana Rossi [1 ]
Pereira, Leonardo Regis Leira [1 ]
机构
[1] Sch Pharmaceut Sci Ribeirao Preto, Dept Pharmaceut Sci, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto Coll Nursing, Dept Gen & Specialized Nursing, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto Coll Nursing, Dept Psychiat Nursing & Human Sci, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
[4] Ave Cafe S-N,Vila Monte Alegre, BR-14040900 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
关键词
Diabetes mellitus; Health knowledge; Attitudes; Practice; Patient reported outcome measures; Surveys and questionnaires; Systematic review; SPOKEN KNOWLEDGE; LOW-LITERACY; VALIDATION; EDUCATION; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; HEALTH; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.dsx.2024.102974
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims: Since knowledge, skills, and attitudes influence the adherence to self -care behaviours, the purpose of this review was to identify available instruments that measure diabetes knowledge, skills or attitudes of people living with this health condition and to evaluate their measurement properties. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science and CINAHL databases. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed by the Consensus -based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments. Risk of Bias checklist. The results of each study were rated by the updated criteria for good measurement properties and the quality of evidence was graded using a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Results: This review included 38 instruments that assess diabetes knowledge (n = 26) or skills (n = 6) or attitudes (n = 5) or both three constructs (n = 1). About 40% had satisfactory results for relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility, and about 30% had unsatisfactory results for comprehensiveness, but these results were supported by very low evidence. Most studies showed indeterminate results for structural validity (50%), internal consistency (98%) and reliability (84%). Instruments that had satisfactory results for construct validity and reliability were supported by low to very low evidence. One responsiveness study was identified, and the result was satisfactory, but supported by low evidence. The Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire is the instrument with best evidence for use. Conclusions: To plan more assertive interventions, researchers need to follow up guidelines to develop instruments with good quality of the measurement proprieties.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Weight maintenance interventions for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review protocol
    Sarah Sauchelli
    Julia Bradley
    Jennifer Cox
    Clare England
    Rachel Perry
    Systematic Reviews, 9
  • [42] Economic evaluations of pharmacist-managed services in people with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review
    Wang, Y.
    Yeo, Q. Q.
    Ko, Y.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2016, 33 (04) : 421 - 427
  • [43] A systematic review of diabetes self-management education interventions for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Asian Western Pacific (AWP) region
    Mohamed, Arbaktun
    Staite, Emily
    Ismail, Khalida
    Winkley, Kirsty
    NURSING OPEN, 2019, 6 (04): : 1424 - 1437
  • [44] The role of pharmacists in the management of Arabic-speaking people with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review
    el Hait, Sami Saqf
    Basheti, Iman A.
    McLachlan, Andrew J.
    Overland, Jane
    Chaar, Betty
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2013, 4 (04) : 239 - 248
  • [45] The Instruments Used to Assess Health Literacy and Pharmacotherapy Literacy of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 Patients: A Scoping Review
    Levic, Marija
    Bogavac-Stanojevic, Natasa
    Krajnovic, Dusanka
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 9
  • [46] Living alone increases the risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on longitudinal studies
    Huang, Jinrong
    Xiao, Liping
    Zhao, Hui
    Liu, Fuwei
    Du, Lihui
    PRIMARY CARE DIABETES, 2024, 18 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [47] Prevalence of diabetes mellitus in people clinically diagnosed with periodontitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies
    Ziukaite, Laura
    Slot, Dagmar E.
    Van der Weijden, Fridus A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2018, 45 (06) : 650 - 662
  • [48] A Systematic Review of Community Health Center Based Interventions for People with Diabetes
    Hae-Ra Han
    Siobhan McKenna
    Manka Nkimbeng
    Patty Wilson
    Sally Rives
    Olayinka Ajomagberin
    Mohammad Alkawaldeh
    Kelli Grunstra
    Nisa Maruthur
    Phyllis Sharps
    Journal of Community Health, 2019, 44 : 1253 - 1280
  • [49] Content Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Developed for Assessing Health-Related Quality of Life in People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Systematic Review
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    Elders, Petra J. M.
    Langendoen-Gort, Marlous
    Elsman, Ellen B. M.
    Prinsen, Cecilia A. C.
    van der Heijden, Amber A.
    de Wit, Maartje
    Beulens, Joline W. J.
    Mokkink, Lidwine B.
    Rutters, Femke
    CURRENT DIABETES REPORTS, 2022, 22 (09) : 405 - 421
  • [50] Efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring in people living with diabetes and end stage kidney disease on dialysis: a systematic review
    Zhang, Yimeng
    Singh, Pushpa
    Ganapathy, Kavitha
    Suresh, Vijayan
    Karamat, Muhammad Ali
    Baharani, Jyoti
    Bellary, Srikanth
    BMC NEPHROLOGY, 2024, 25 (01)