Instruments to assess diabetes knowledge, skills and attitudes of people living with diabetes mellitus: A COSMIN-based systematic review

被引:0
作者
Lemos, Carla Assad [1 ,4 ]
Oliveira, Thalita Zago [1 ]
Cunha, Joao Paulo Alves [1 ]
Costa, Daiane Vieira Medeiros [2 ]
Zanetti, Maria Olivia Barboza [3 ]
Dantas, Rosana Aparecida Spadoti [2 ]
Varallo, Fabiana Rossi [1 ]
Pereira, Leonardo Regis Leira [1 ]
机构
[1] Sch Pharmaceut Sci Ribeirao Preto, Dept Pharmaceut Sci, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto Coll Nursing, Dept Gen & Specialized Nursing, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto Coll Nursing, Dept Psychiat Nursing & Human Sci, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
[4] Ave Cafe S-N,Vila Monte Alegre, BR-14040900 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
关键词
Diabetes mellitus; Health knowledge; Attitudes; Practice; Patient reported outcome measures; Surveys and questionnaires; Systematic review; SPOKEN KNOWLEDGE; LOW-LITERACY; VALIDATION; EDUCATION; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; HEALTH; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.dsx.2024.102974
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims: Since knowledge, skills, and attitudes influence the adherence to self -care behaviours, the purpose of this review was to identify available instruments that measure diabetes knowledge, skills or attitudes of people living with this health condition and to evaluate their measurement properties. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science and CINAHL databases. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed by the Consensus -based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments. Risk of Bias checklist. The results of each study were rated by the updated criteria for good measurement properties and the quality of evidence was graded using a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Results: This review included 38 instruments that assess diabetes knowledge (n = 26) or skills (n = 6) or attitudes (n = 5) or both three constructs (n = 1). About 40% had satisfactory results for relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility, and about 30% had unsatisfactory results for comprehensiveness, but these results were supported by very low evidence. Most studies showed indeterminate results for structural validity (50%), internal consistency (98%) and reliability (84%). Instruments that had satisfactory results for construct validity and reliability were supported by low to very low evidence. One responsiveness study was identified, and the result was satisfactory, but supported by low evidence. The Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire is the instrument with best evidence for use. Conclusions: To plan more assertive interventions, researchers need to follow up guidelines to develop instruments with good quality of the measurement proprieties.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measuring Self-management Among People with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Diabetes-Specific Instruments in English and Chinese
    Jiang, Tian
    Li, Aihua
    Zhang, Minlu
    Zhou, Zhou
    Wang, Lu
    Zhang, Xiaoqian
    Zhang, Yi
    Zhang, Qiu
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2023, 40 (03) : 769 - 813
  • [2] Oral health knowledge, attitudes and care practices of people with diabetes: a systematic review
    Poudel, Prakash
    Griffiths, Rhonda
    Wong, Vincent W.
    Arora, Amit
    Flack, Jeff R.
    Khoo, Chee L.
    George, Ajesh
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 18
  • [3] Self-administered health literacy instruments for people with diabetes: systematic review of measurement properties
    Lee, Eun-Hyun
    Kim, Chun-Ja
    Lee, Jiyeon
    Moon, Seung Hei
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2017, 73 (09) : 2035 - 2048
  • [4] Oral Health Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of People Living with Diabetes in South Asia: A Scoping Review
    Poudel, Prakash
    Rawal, Lal B.
    Kong, Ariana
    Yadav, Uday N.
    Sousa, Mariana S.
    Karmacharya, Biraj
    Pradhan, Shaili
    George, Ajesh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (21)
  • [5] Diabetes Mellitus Family Assessment Instruments: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
    Soares, Vania Lidia
    Lemos, Sara
    Barbieri-Figueiredo, Maria do Ceu
    Morais, Maria Carminda Soares
    Sequeira, Carlos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 20 (02)
  • [6] A systematic review of outcome measurement instruments used in pouch anal and vaginal fistulae: a COSMIN-based analysis
    Anand, Easan
    Joshi, Shivani
    Reza, Lillian
    Sahnan, Kapil
    Lung, Phillip
    Hart, Ailsa
    Tozer, Phil
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2025, : 1521 - 1539
  • [7] Psychometric properties of self-reported instruments for occupational balance: A COSMIN-based systematic review
    Park, Sangmi
    Lee, Chang Dae
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SCIENCE, 2024, 31 (02) : 371 - 385
  • [8] Instruments to assess self-efficacy among people with cardiovascular disease: A COSMIN systematic review
    Kavradim, Selma Turan
    Yangoz, Sefika Tugba
    Ozer, Zeynep Canli
    Boz, Ilkay
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 74 (11)
  • [9] The suitability of patient-reported outcome measures used to assess the impact of hypoglycaemia on quality of life in people with diabetes: a systematic review using COSMIN methods
    Carlton, Jill
    Leaviss, Joanna
    Pouwer, Frans
    Hendrieckx, Christel
    Broadley, Melanie M.
    Clowes, Mark
    McCrimmon, Rory J.
    Heller, Simon R.
    Speight, Jane
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2021, 64 (06) : 1213 - 1225
  • [10] Knowledge of diabetes mellitus in the school: A systematic review of African Studies
    Agofure, O.
    Oghenenioborue, Okandeji-Barry R.
    Odjimogho, S.
    Efegbere, H.
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF DIABETES MEDICINE, 2020, 28 (02):