Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale for use in Brazil: a cross-sectional study

被引:1
作者
Moritz, Nicole Morem Pilau [1 ,2 ]
Moritz, Jose Eduardo [3 ]
Parma, Gabriel Oscar Cremona [1 ]
Dexter, Franklin [4 ]
Traebert, Jefferson [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Santa Catarina, Programa Posgrad Ciencias Saude, Palhoca, SC, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Dept Anestesia, Hosp Univ, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[3] Ultralitho Ctr Med, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[4] Univ Iowa, Dept Anesthesia, Iowa City, IA USA
来源
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY | 2024年 / 74卷 / 03期
关键词
Ambulatory surgical procedures; Anesthesia; Conscious sedation; Patient satisfaction; Validation study; PATIENT-SATISFACTION; PROCEDURAL SEDATION; CLINICAL-TRIALS; CARE; PART; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjane.2023.11.001
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale (ISAS) was developed to assess the satisfaction of patients undergoing sedation with monitored anesthesia care. This study aimed to cross -culturally adapt the ISAS instrument and evaluate the acceptability, validity, and reliability of the proposed Brazilian version (ISAS-Br). Methods: The cross-cultural adaptation process involved translation, synthesis, back -translation, expert committee review, pre -testing, and final review of the ISAS-Br. A cross-sectional study was conducted, involving 127 adult individuals undergoing ambulatory surgeries with moderate/deep sedation. The acceptability, reliability, and construct validity of the scale were assessed. Results: The cross-cultural adaptation process did not require significant changes to the final version of the scale. The ISAS-Br demonstrated excellent acceptability, with a completion rate of 99% and an average completion time of 4.6 minutes. Exploratory factor analysis revealed three factors: emotional well-being, physical comfort, and anxiety relief, with respective composite reliability coefficient values of 0.874, 0.580, and 0.428. The test -retest reliability of the ISAS-Br, measured by the intraclass correlation coefficient, was 0.67 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.42 to 0.83), and the Bland -Altman plot showed satisfactory agreement between the measurements. Conclusion: The proposed Brazilian version of the ISAS underwent successful cross-cultural adaptation according to international standards. It demonstrated good acceptability and reliability, regarding the assessment of temporal stability. However, the ISAS-Br exhibited low internal consistency for some factors, indicating that this instrument lacks sensitivity to assess the satisfaction of deeply sedated patients. Further studies are necessary to explore the hypotheses raised based on the knowledge of its psychometric properties. (c) 2023 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Espa & ntilde;a, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the CC BY -NC -ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validity and reliability of the Iranian preterm birth experiences and satisfaction scale: A methodological and cross-sectional study
    Najjarzadeh, Maryam
    Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi, Sakineh
    Abbas-Alizadeh, Shamsi
    Jafarabadi, Mohammad Asghari
    Mirghafourvand, Mojgan
    Tagipour-Amidi, Nahid
    Sawyer, Alexandra
    Ayers, Susan
    HEALTH PROMOTION PERSPECTIVES, 2021, 11 (01): : 97 - 108
  • [22] Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Newcastle Satisfaction With Nursing Scales into the Brazilian culture
    Dorigan, Gisele Hespanhol
    Guirardello, Edineis de Brito
    REVISTA DA ESCOLA DE ENFERMAGEM DA USP, 2013, 47 (03) : 561 - 567
  • [23] Parent Satisfaction With Pediatric Anesthesia-A Cross-Sectional, Multicenter Study in Norway
    Leonardsen, Ann-Chatrin Linqvist
    Valeberg, Berit Taraldsen
    Danielsen, Annette
    Jonth, Cecilia
    Brunborg, Ingrid Marie
    Jorgensen, Endre Dingstad
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2025,
  • [24] Adaptation and validation of the Carolinas Comfort Scale: a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study
    Parseliunas, A.
    Paskauskas, S.
    Simatoniene, V.
    Vaitekunas, J.
    Venskutonis, D.
    HERNIA, 2022, 26 (03) : 735 - 744
  • [25] Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the FRAIL Scale to Assess Frailty in Mexican Adults
    Rosas-Carrasco, Oscar
    Cruz-Arenas, Esteban
    Parra-Rodriguez, Lorena
    Isabel Garcia-Gonzalez, Ana
    Horacio Contreras-Gonzalez, Luis
    Szlejf, Claudia
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2016, 17 (12) : 1094 - 1098
  • [26] Levels of Cognitive Functioning Assessment Scale: Italian cross-cultural adaptation and validation
    Galeoto, G.
    Turriziani, S.
    Berardi, A.
    Sansoni, J.
    Santilli, V
    Mascio, M.
    Paoloni, M.
    ANNALI DI IGIENE MEDICINA PREVENTIVA E DI COMUNITA, 2020, 32 (01): : 16 - 26
  • [27] Marx Activity Rating Scale: Italian translation, validation and cross-cultural adaptation
    Marsocci, Antonio
    Curti, Francesca
    Angelini, Fabiana
    Panico, Martina
    Cipriano, Massimiliano
    Peretti, Ambrogio
    Mossa, Luigi
    Magnifica, Fabrizio
    MINERVA ORTHOPEDICS, 2024, 75 (02): : 97 - 106
  • [28] Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Protective Nursing Advocacy Scale for Brazilian nurses
    Tomaschewski-Barlem, Jamila Geri
    Lunardi, Valeria Lerch
    Devos Barlem, Edison Luiz
    da Silveira, Rosemary Silva
    Dalmolin, Graziele de Lima
    Ramos, Aline Marcelino
    REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2015, 23 (04): : 669 - 676
  • [29] Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Korean version of rehabilitation complexity scale for the measurement of complex rehabilitation needs
    Lee, Hoo Young
    Park, Jung Hyun
    Kim, Tae-Woo
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (24) : E26259
  • [30] Multiple sclerosis: cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the modified fatigue impact scale
    Pavan, Karina
    Schmidt, Kizi
    Marangoni, Bruna
    Mendes, Maria Fernanda
    Tilbery, Charles Peter
    Lianza, Sergio
    ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA, 2007, 65 (3A) : 669 - 673