Engaging Populism? The Popularity of European Populist Political Parties on Facebook and Twitter, 2010-2020

被引:0
作者
Davidson, Thomas R. [1 ]
Enos, Jenny [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Sociol, 26 Nichol Ave, New Brunswick, NJ 08540 USA
关键词
Populism; social media; political parties; Facebook; Twitter; SOCIAL MEDIA; OPPORTUNITY STRUCTURES; COMMUNICATION; CAMPAIGN; ONLINE; TIME; MODELS;
D O I
10.1080/10584609.2024.2369118
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Scholars have argued that populists disproportionately benefit from social media, and there is evidence that they attract more engagement than other politicians and parties in several countries. We systematically evaluate the relationship between populism and online popularity using a novel dataset covering over four hundred parties active on Facebook and Twitter in thirty European countries between 2010 and 2020. We use Bayesian hierarchical models to assess the relationship between populism and three types of engagement on each platform. We find that populists received more engagement than other parties on Facebook, but there was no consistent relationship on Twitter. Among these parties, only right-wing populist parties had any widespread advantages. Our results highlight considerable heterogeneity across countries and over time, providing new insight into the scope and scale of populists' online popularity. This includes evidence that left-wing and centrist parties attracted more engagement in a handful of countries. We evaluate several explanations for these results, finding that negative macroeconomic indicators and increased migration are positively correlated with populist engagement, while internet and social media adoption have mixed impacts that benefit right-wing populists.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 200
页数:30
相关论文
共 95 条
  • [1] Olfactory Wearables for Mobile Targeted Memory Reactivation
    Amores, Judith
    Mehra, Nirmita
    Rasch, Bjoern
    Maes, Pattie
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, CHI 2023, 2023,
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2024, World Development Indicators
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2021, Do you participate in social networks? Disponivel em
  • [4] Political opportunity structures and right-wing extremist party success
    Arzheimer, K
    Carter, E
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH, 2006, 45 (03) : 419 - 443
  • [5] Barrie C., 2021, J. Open Source Softw, V6, P3272, DOI [DOI 10.21105/JOSS.03272, 10.21105/joss.03272]
  • [6] Random coefficient models for time-series-cross-section data: Monte Carlo experiments
    Beck, Nathaniel
    Katz, Jonathan N.
    [J]. POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2007, 15 (02) : 182 - 195
  • [7] Keep Them Engaged! Investigating the Effects of Self-centered Social Media Communication Style on User Engagement in 12 European Countries
    Bene, Marton
    Ceron, Andrea
    Fenoll, Vicente
    Hassler, Joerg
    Kruschinski, Simon
    Larsson, Anders Olof
    Magin, Melanie
    Schlosser, Katharina
    Wurst, Anna-Katharina
    [J]. POLITICAL COMMUNICATION, 2022, 39 (04) : 429 - 453
  • [8] Who reaps the benefits? A cross-country investigation of the absolute and relative normalization and equalization theses in the 2019 European Parliament elections
    Bene, Marton
    [J]. NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2023, 25 (07) : 1708 - 1727
  • [9] The Causes of Populism in the West
    Berman, Sheri
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, VOL 24, 2021, 2021, 24 : 71 - 88
  • [10] Betz Hans-Georg., 1994, RADICAL RIGHT WING P, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-23547-6