Health-related quality of life, needs, and concerns among cancer survivors referred to rehabilitation in primary healthcare setting

被引:1
作者
Sandager, Mette T. [1 ]
Rossen, Sine [1 ]
Hofland, Dorte T. [1 ]
Nielsen, Claus V. [2 ,3 ]
Maribo, Thomas [2 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Ctr Canc & Hlth, Municipal Copenhagen, Norre Alle 45, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] DEFACTUM Cent Denmark Reg, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
Cancer rehabilitation; health-related quality of life; patient-reported outcomes; functional assessment of cancer therapy-general; International Classification of Functioning; Disability and Health; holistic rehabilitation; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; LONG-TERM; VALIDATION; THERAPY; SCALE;
D O I
10.2340/1651-226X.2024.19636
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: There is a growing need for rehabilitation services beyond hospitals. This study aims to describe challenges faced by cancer survivors (CSs) referred for rehabilitation in primary healthcare, employing standardized scales measuring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and open-ended questions. Furthermore, the study explores the applicability of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in comprehensively understanding challenges encountered by CSs. Material and methods: This cross-sectional study involves CSs referred for cancer rehabilitation in a primary healthcare setting, including those participating in PROs as a part of routine practice. HRQOL was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framed the analysis of responses to open-ended questions 'what concerns you the most?' and 'what matters to you?' Results: FACT-G showed the lowest scores for functional well-being (14.4) and emotional well-being (16.6), with higher scores for physical well-being (18.9) and social/family well-being (21.1). Responses to openended questions unveiled worries about everyday life and how cancer will impact family well-being presently and in the future. Furthermore, CSs reported a need to maintain normality and proactively address the challenges posed by the disease. Interpretation: CSs referred for rehabilitation in primary healthcare experience comprehensive challenges necessitating a holistic rehabilitation approach. This includes interventions supporting CSs in dealing with uncertainty, regaining a sense of control, and addressing family well-being concerns. When using PROs for need assessment, the combination of validated HRQOL scales and open-ended questions is crucial for an in-depth understanding of CSs' challenges.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 82
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2005, From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition
  • [2] [Anonymous], International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)
  • [3] THE FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF CANCER-THERAPY SCALE - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE GENERAL MEASURE
    CELLA, DF
    TULSKY, DS
    GRAY, G
    SARAFIAN, B
    LINN, E
    BONOMI, A
    SILBERMAN, M
    YELLEN, SB
    WINICOUR, P
    BRANNON, J
    ECKBERG, K
    LLOYD, S
    PURL, S
    BLENDOWSKI, C
    GOODMAN, M
    BARNICLE, M
    STEWART, I
    MCHALE, M
    BONOMI, P
    KAPLAN, E
    TAYLOR, S
    THOMAS, CR
    HARRIS, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (03) : 570 - 579
  • [4] A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting
    Chen, Jack
    Ou, Lixin
    Hollis, Stephanie J.
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2013, 13
  • [5] Refinements of the ICF Linking Rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information
    Cieza, Alarcos
    Fayed, Nora
    Bickenbach, Jerome
    Prodinger, Birgit
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2019, 41 (05) : 574 - 583
  • [6] Socioeconomic position, referral and attendance to rehabilitation after a cancer diagnosis: A population-based study in Copenhagen, Denmark 2010-2015
    Dalton, Susanne Oksbjerg
    Olsen, Maja Halgren
    Moustsen, Ida Rask
    Andersen, Carina Wedell
    Vibe-Petersen, Jette
    Johansen, Christoffer
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2019, 58 (05) : 730 - 736
  • [7] A combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches determined minimally important differences (MIDs) for four endpoints in a breast cancer scale
    Eton, DT
    Cella, D
    Yost, KJ
    Yount, SE
    Peterman, AH
    Neuberg, DS
    Sledge, GW
    Wood, WC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 57 (09) : 898 - 910
  • [8] facit, FACIT measures & searchable library Internet
  • [9] Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 29 cancer groups, 2006 to 2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease study
    Fitzmaurice, Christina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (15)
  • [10] Why cancer survivorship care needs assessment may lead to no clear patient pathway - Based on patients' experiences and perspectives
    Handberg, Charlotte
    Maribo, Thomas
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2020, 48