Learning Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimens Subject to Stagewise Risk Controls

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Mochuan [1 ]
Wang, Yuanjia [2 ]
Fu, Haoda [3 ]
Zeng, Donglin [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Biostat, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Biostat, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] Eli Lilly & Co, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Dynamic treatment regimens; Precision medicine; Benefit-risk tradeoff; Acute adverse events; Weighted support vector machine; INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT RULES; DESIGN; REGRET; INFERENCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Dynamic treatment regimens (DTRs) aim at tailoring individualized sequential treatment rules that maximize cumulative beneficial outcomes by accommodating patients' heterogeneity in decision -making. For many chronic diseases including type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), treatments are usually multifaceted in the sense that aggressive treatments with a higher expected reward are also likely to elevate the risk of acute adverse events. In this paper, we propose a new weighted learning framework, namely benefit -risk dynamic treatment regimens (BR-DTRs), to address the benefit -risk trade-off. The new framework relies on a backward learning procedure by restricting the induced risk of the treatment rule to be no larger than a pre -specified risk constraint at each treatment stage. Computationally, the estimated treatment rule solves a weighted support vector machine problem with a modified smooth constraint. Theoretically, we show that the proposed DTRs are Fisher consistent, and we further obtain the convergence rates for both the value and risk functions. Finally, the performance of the proposed method is demonstrated via extensive simulation studies and application to a real study for T2D patients.
引用
收藏
页数:64
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Methods in dynamic treatment regimens using observational healthcare data: A systematic review
    Liang, David
    Paul, Animesh Kumar
    Weir, Daniala L.
    Deneer, Vera H. M.
    Greiner, Russell
    Siebes, Arno
    Gardarsdottir, Helga
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2025, 263
  • [32] A scoping review of studies using observational data to optimise dynamic treatment regimens
    Mahar, Robert K.
    McGuinness, Myra B.
    Chakraborty, Bibhas
    Carlin, John B.
    IJzerman, Maarten J.
    Simpson, Julie A.
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [33] Optimal Treatment Regimes for Proximal Causal Learning
    Shen, Tao
    Cui, Yifan
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 36 (NEURIPS 2023), 2023,
  • [34] Learning Optimal Group-structured Individualized Treatment Rules with Many Treatments
    Ma, Haixu
    Zeng, Donglin
    Liu, Yufeng
    JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH, 2023, 24
  • [35] Q-Learning in Dynamic Treatment Regimes With Misclassified Binary Outcome
    Liu, Dan
    He, Wenqing
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 43 (30) : 5885 - 5897
  • [36] Multi-stage optimal dynamic treatment regimes for survival outcomes with dependent censoring
    Cho, Hunyong
    Holloway, Shannon T.
    Couper, David J.
    Kosorok, Michael R.
    BIOMETRIKA, 2022, : 395 - 410
  • [37] Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes With Survival Outcomes
    Simoneau, Gabrielle
    Moodie, Erica E. M.
    Nijjar, Jagtar S.
    Platt, Robert W.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 115 (531) : 1531 - 1539
  • [38] Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes and Partial Welfare Ordering
    Han, Sukjin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 119 (547) : 2000 - 2010
  • [39] Accommodating misclassification effects on optimizing dynamic treatment regimes with Q-learning
    Charvadeh, Yasin Khadem
    Yi, Grace Y.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 43 (03) : 578 - 605
  • [40] Estimating Dynamic Treatment Regimes in Mobile Health Using V-Learning
    Luckett, Daniel J.
    Laber, Eric B.
    Kahkoska, Anna R.
    Maahs, David M.
    Mayer-Davis, Elizabeth
    Kosorok, Michael R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 115 (530) : 692 - 706