Citizen Science Studies in Nursing: A Systematic Review

被引:0
|
作者
Torro-Pons, Carmen [1 ]
Saus-Ortega, Carlos [2 ]
Ballestar-Tarin, Maria-Luisa [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Fac Nursing & Podiatry, Dept Nursing, C Jaume Roig S-N, Valencia 46010, Spain
[2] Escuela Univ Enfermeria La Fe, Grp Invest Arte & Ciencia Cuidados, IISLaFe, Av Fernando Abril Martorell 106, Valencia 46026, Spain
[3] Univ Valencia, Nursing Care & Educ Res Grp GRIECE, GIUV2019 456, C Jaume Roig S-N, Valencia 46010, Spain
关键词
citizen science; nursing; health; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; PHOTOVOICE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.3390/nursrep14020072
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Citizen science is a research approach wherein citizens actively participate alongside professionals in some or all stages of the research process. The bidirectional benefits it generates, especially in the field of health, including empowerment, new hypotheses, and results, and addressing issues truly important to society, justify the necessity to establish a common framework and address barriers to ensure a fruitful evolution of this new approach within nursing research. The aim was to analyze nursing projects with a citizen science focus that have been conducted. Methods: PRISMA guidelines were employed to conduct a systematic review. Searches were conducted on PubMed, CINHAL, LILACS, IBECS, and Cochrane. Following the identification and screening process, 13 studies were included. The quality of the articles was assessed using the Joanna Brigg Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist and the quality of citizen science research using the Citizen Science Appraisal Tool. Results: Citizen science studies in nursing were notably recent (2017-2023). Five research areas were identified, with environmental health being the most predominant. Multiple tools, both technological and traditional, were utilized, with the "Photovoice" and "Our Voice" methodologies being prominent. Citizen participation was limited to data collection and analysis in 7 out of the 13 studies, with most studies working with small samples. Findings regarding the application of this practice were positive, but no study exceeded 26 points on the CSAT scale to be considered high quality in citizen science. Conclusions: Citizen science can be a promising approach within the field of nursing. There is a need to increase individual participation to fully realize the potential bidirectional benefits. It is imperative to establish a common theoretical framework and continue working on the development of this methodology within nursing.
引用
收藏
页码:946 / 960
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Every participant is a PI. Citizen science and participatory governance in population studies
    Buyx, Alena
    Del Savio, Lorenzo
    Prainsack, Barbara
    Voelzke, Henry
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 46 (02) : 377 - 384
  • [42] A Systematic Literature Review of Efficiency Measurement in Nursing Homes
    Tran, Alice
    Kim-Huong Nguyen
    Gray, Len
    Comans, Tracy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (12)
  • [43] Motivation for health behaviours: a systematic review of the nursing literature
    Carter, KF
    Kulbok, PA
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2002, 40 (03) : 316 - 330
  • [44] Introduction and Systematic Review of the Good Nursing Care Scale
    Mattila, Tuula
    Stolt, Minna
    Katajisto, Jouko
    Leino-Kilpi, Helena
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2025, 34 (01) : 5 - 23
  • [45] Citizen science approaches to crowdsourcing food environment data: A scoping review of the literature
    Monaghan, Jacqueline
    Backholer, Kathryn
    McKelvey, Amy-Louise
    Christidis, Rebecca
    Borda, Ann
    Calyx, Cobi
    Crocetti, Alessandro
    Driessen, Christine
    Zorbas, Christina
    OBESITY REVIEWS, 2023, 24 (11)
  • [46] Analysis of gender perspective in the use of NANDA-I nursing diagnoses: A systematic review
    Rosa Rifa-Ros, Ma
    Rodriguez-Monforte, Miriam
    Carrillo-Alvarez, Elena
    Barreto-Da Silva, Luana
    Pallares-Marti, Angela
    Gasch-Gallen, Angel
    NURSING OPEN, 2023, 10 (03): : 1305 - 1326
  • [47] Effectiveness of stress management interventions for nursing students: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ji, Xuan
    Guo, Xiaoyan
    Soh, Kim Lam
    Japar, Salimah
    He, Liping
    NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2024, 26 (02)
  • [48] Abusive Supervision and Its Relationship With Nursing Workforce and Patient Safety Outcomes: A Systematic Review
    Labrague, Leodoro J.
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2024, 46 (01) : 52 - 63
  • [49] Nursing Staff's Perspectives of Care Robots for Assisted LivingFacilities:Systematic Literature Review
    Trainum, Katie
    Liu, Jiaying
    Hauser, Elliott
    Xie, Bo
    JMIR AGING, 2024, 7
  • [50] ‘Citizen Scientists’ on Citizen Science
    Tolbert S.
    Olson C.
    Haq R.U.
    Evans L.
    dos Santos A.P.O.
    Franco A.A.
    Jager I.
    Kovač M.
    Orchard S.
    Harris S.
    Šrajer F.
    Santos-Lang C.
    Jandrić P.
    Hayes S.
    Jopling M.
    Postdigital Science and Education, 2025, 7 (1) : 120 - 142