Citizen Science Studies in Nursing: A Systematic Review

被引:1
作者
Torro-Pons, Carmen [1 ]
Saus-Ortega, Carlos [2 ]
Ballestar-Tarin, Maria-Luisa [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Fac Nursing & Podiatry, Dept Nursing, C Jaume Roig S-N, Valencia 46010, Spain
[2] Escuela Univ Enfermeria La Fe, Grp Invest Arte & Ciencia Cuidados, IISLaFe, Av Fernando Abril Martorell 106, Valencia 46026, Spain
[3] Univ Valencia, Nursing Care & Educ Res Grp GRIECE, GIUV2019 456, C Jaume Roig S-N, Valencia 46010, Spain
关键词
citizen science; nursing; health; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; PHOTOVOICE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.3390/nursrep14020072
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Citizen science is a research approach wherein citizens actively participate alongside professionals in some or all stages of the research process. The bidirectional benefits it generates, especially in the field of health, including empowerment, new hypotheses, and results, and addressing issues truly important to society, justify the necessity to establish a common framework and address barriers to ensure a fruitful evolution of this new approach within nursing research. The aim was to analyze nursing projects with a citizen science focus that have been conducted. Methods: PRISMA guidelines were employed to conduct a systematic review. Searches were conducted on PubMed, CINHAL, LILACS, IBECS, and Cochrane. Following the identification and screening process, 13 studies were included. The quality of the articles was assessed using the Joanna Brigg Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist and the quality of citizen science research using the Citizen Science Appraisal Tool. Results: Citizen science studies in nursing were notably recent (2017-2023). Five research areas were identified, with environmental health being the most predominant. Multiple tools, both technological and traditional, were utilized, with the "Photovoice" and "Our Voice" methodologies being prominent. Citizen participation was limited to data collection and analysis in 7 out of the 13 studies, with most studies working with small samples. Findings regarding the application of this practice were positive, but no study exceeded 26 points on the CSAT scale to be considered high quality in citizen science. Conclusions: Citizen science can be a promising approach within the field of nursing. There is a need to increase individual participation to fully realize the potential bidirectional benefits. It is imperative to establish a common theoretical framework and continue working on the development of this methodology within nursing.
引用
收藏
页码:946 / 960
页数:15
相关论文
共 65 条
[51]  
Serrano F., 2016, Observatorio de la Ciencia Ciudadana en Espana
[52]   Women's Experiences of Symptoms of Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19 Illness During the Pandemic [J].
South, Katherine ;
Bakken, Suzanne ;
Koleck, Theresa ;
Barcelona, Veronica ;
Elhadad, Noemie ;
Dreisbach, Caitlin .
NURSING FOR WOMENS HEALTH, 2022, 26 (06) :450-461
[53]  
Stanifer Stacy, 2022, Citiz Sci, V7, DOI 10.5334/cstp.472
[54]   A call for citizen science in pandemic preparedness and response: beyond data collection [J].
Tan, Yi-Roe ;
Agrawal, Anurag ;
Matsoso, Malebona Precious ;
Katz, Rebecca ;
Davis, Sara L. M. ;
Winkler, Andrea Sylvia ;
Huber, Annalena ;
Joshi, Ashish ;
El-Mohandes, Ayman ;
Mellado, Bruce ;
Mubaira, Caroline Antonia ;
Canlas, Felipe C. ;
Asiki, Gershim ;
Khosa, Harjyot ;
Lazarus, Jeffrey Victor ;
Choisy, Marc ;
Recamonde-Mendoza, Mariana ;
Keiser, Olivia ;
Okwen, Patrick ;
English, Rene ;
Stinckwich, Serge ;
Kiwuwa-Muyingo, Sylvia ;
Kutadza, Tariro ;
Sethi, Tavpritesh ;
Mathaha, Thuso ;
Vinh Kim Nguyen ;
Gill, Amandeep ;
Yap, Peiling .
BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2022, 7 (06)
[55]   Citizen science in the social sciences and humanities: the power of interdisciplinarity [J].
Tauginiene, Loreta ;
Butkeviciene, Egle ;
Vohland, Katrin ;
Heinisch, Barbara ;
Daskolia, Maria ;
Suskevics, Monika ;
Portela, Manuel ;
Balazs, Balint ;
Pruse, Baiba .
PALGRAVE COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 6 (01)
[56]   Best practice guidelines for citizen science in mental health research: systematic review and evidence synthesis [J].
Todowede, Olamide ;
Lewandowski, Felix ;
Kotera, Yasuhiro ;
Ashmore, Alison ;
Rennick-Egglestone, Stefan ;
Boyd, Doreen ;
Moran, Stuart ;
Orjasaeter, Kristin Berre ;
Repper, Julie ;
Robotham, Dan ;
Rowe, Michael ;
Katsampa, Dafni ;
Slade, Mike .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 14
[57]   Patients' perspective on how to improve the care of people with chronic conditions in France: a citizen science study within the ComPaRe e-cohort [J].
Tran, Viet-Thi ;
Riveros, Carolina ;
Pean, Clarisse ;
Czarnobroda, Arnaud ;
Ravaud, Philippe .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2019, 28 (11) :875-886
[58]   Using citizen science to empower older adults to improve a food security initiative in Australia [J].
Tuckett, Anthony G. ;
Rowbotham, Samantha ;
Hetherington, Sharon ;
Goddard, Jodie ;
King, Abby C. .
HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (01)
[59]   Older Adults Using Our Voice Citizen Science to Create Change in Their Neighborhood Environment [J].
Tuckett, Anthony G. ;
Freeman, Abbey ;
Hetherington, Sharon ;
Gardiner, Paul A. ;
King, Abby C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (12)
[60]   Changes in Fruit and Vegetable Consumption and Leisure Time Physical Exercise after a Citizen Science-Based Worksite Health Promotion Program for Blue-Collar Workers [J].
van der Feltz, Sophie ;
van der Molen, Henk F. ;
Lelie, Lisa ;
Hulshof, Carel T. J. ;
van der Beek, Allard J. ;
Proper, Karin, I .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (20)